Alford Jessica, Vignali Jonathan, Collen Jacob, Balkin Thomas, Thomas Connie
Liberty University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Lynchburg, Virginia.
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Fed Pract. 2024 Jun;41(6):178-187. doi: 10.12788/fp.0480. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
Failure to effectively treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and its symptoms is incompatible with military readiness. Continuous positive airway pressure (PAP) is the gold standard treatment for OSA, but it is impractical in austere environments. Another OSA treatment, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS), which is implanted, could have advantages for military patients but is unclear whether HGNS is efficacious.
We conducted a review of randomized controlled trials and controlled trials published from 2013 to 2023. Primary outcome measures included the Apnea-Hypopnea Index and Epworth Sleepiness Scale. The quality of evidence was assessed using a rating of 1 to 5 based on a modification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation.
We identified 334 studies; 318 did not meet inclusion criteria. The remaining 16 articles were classified into 9 cohorts. Six articles were based on data from the STAR trial and 4 were based on data from a German postmarket long-term follow-up of upper airway stimulation for OSA efficacy. The remaining cohorts were smaller studies that examined moderate-to-severe OSA with nonadherence or failure, a randomized controlled crossover trial, and 1 direct comparator with PAP treatment.
HGNS feasibility in military settings has not been adequately studied, considering the specific demands of operational settings and patient demographics. Understanding risks and benefits specific to military context will help guide practices and determine the suitability of HGNS for OSA in diverse military settings.
未能有效治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)及其症状与军事准备状态不相容。持续气道正压通气(PAP)是OSA的金标准治疗方法,但在艰苦环境中不切实际。另一种OSA治疗方法,即植入式舌下神经刺激(HGNS),可能对军事患者具有优势,但HGNS是否有效尚不清楚。
我们对2013年至2023年发表的随机对照试验和对照试验进行了综述。主要结局指标包括呼吸暂停低通气指数和爱泼华嗜睡量表。基于对牛津循证医学中心证据水平和推荐等级的修改,采用1至5的评分来评估证据质量。
我们识别出334项研究;318项不符合纳入标准。其余16篇文章被分为9个队列。6篇文章基于STAR试验的数据,4篇基于德国对上气道刺激治疗OSA疗效的上市后长期随访数据。其余队列是规模较小的研究,考察了中度至重度OSA伴不依从或治疗失败的情况、一项随机对照交叉试验,以及1项与PAP治疗的直接比较。
考虑到作战环境的特定需求和患者人口统计学特征,HGNS在军事环境中的可行性尚未得到充分研究。了解军事背景下的特定风险和益处将有助于指导实践,并确定HGNS在不同军事环境中对OSA的适用性。