MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
AIDS Behav. 2020 Mar;24(3):667-681. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0.
Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) carries a greater per-act risk of HIV acquisition than receptive vaginal intercourse (RVI) and may influence HIV epidemics driven by heterosexual sex. This systematic review explores the association between RAI and incident HIV among women, globally. We searched Embase and Medline through September 2018 for longitudinal studies reporting crude (cRR) or adjusted (aRR) relative risks of HIV acquisition by RAI practice among women. Of 27,563 articles identified, 17 eligible studies were included. We pooled independent study estimates using random-effects models. Women reporting RAI were more likely to acquire HIV than women not reporting RAI (pooled cRR = 1.56 95% CI 1.03-2.38, N = 18, I = 72%; pooled aRR = 2.23, 1.01-4.92, N = 5, I = 70%). In subgroup analyses the association was lower for women in Africa (pooled cRR = 1.16, N = 13, I = 21%) than outside Africa (pooled cRR = 4.10, N = 5, I = 79%) and for high-risk (pooled aRR = 1.69, N = 4, I = 63%) than general-risk women (pooled aRR = 8.50, N = 1). Interview method slightly influenced cRR estimates (p value = 0.04). In leave-one-out sensitivity analyses pooled estimates were generally robust to removing individual study estimates. Main limitations included poor exposure definition, incomplete adjustment for confounders, particularly condom use, and use of non-confidential interview methods. More and better data are needed to explain differences in risk by world region and risk population. Women require better counselling and greater choice in prevention modalities that are effective during RVI and RAI.
接受肛交(RAI)比接受阴道交(RVI)单次行为的 HIV 感染风险更高,可能会影响异性性传播驱动的 HIV 流行。本系统综述在全球范围内探讨了 RAI 与女性 HIV 新发感染之间的关系。我们检索了 Embase 和 Medline,检索截至 2018 年 9 月,以获取报告女性 RAI 行为与 HIV 新发感染之间粗(cRR)或调整(aRR)相对风险的纵向研究。在确定的 27563 篇文章中,有 17 项符合条件的研究被纳入。我们使用随机效应模型对独立研究进行了汇总。与不报告 RAI 的女性相比,报告 RAI 的女性更有可能感染 HIV(合并 cRR=1.56,95%CI 1.03-2.38,N=18,I=72%;合并 aRR=2.23,1.01-4.92,N=5,I=70%)。在亚组分析中,非洲女性的相关性较低(合并 cRR=1.16,N=13,I=21%),而非非洲女性的相关性较高(合并 cRR=4.10,N=5,I=79%),高风险女性(合并 aRR=1.69,N=4,I=63%)的相关性低于一般风险女性(合并 aRR=8.50,N=1)。访谈方法对 cRR 估计值有一定影响(p 值=0.04)。在逐一剔除敏感性分析中,合并估计值总体上对剔除个别研究估计值是稳健的。主要限制因素包括暴露定义不佳、混杂因素调整不完整,特别是对避孕套使用的调整,以及使用非保密的访谈方法。需要更多和更好的数据来解释不同地区和不同风险人群的风险差异。需要对女性进行更好的咨询,并提供更多在 RVI 和 RAI 期间有效的预防方式选择。