Suppr超能文献

T1期直肠癌患者经肛门长期切除的结果:根治性切除的比较分析

Long-term Transanal Excision Outcomes in Patients With T1 Rectal Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Radical Resection.

作者信息

Hwang Yunghuyn, Yoon Yong Sik, Bong Jun Woo, Choi Hye Yun, Song In Ho, Lee Jong Lyul, Kim Chan Wook, Park In Ja, Lim Seok-Byung, Yu Chang Sik, Kim Jin Cheon

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Coloproctol. 2019 Aug;35(4):194-201. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.10.18.2. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Transanal excision (TAE) is an alternative surgical procedure for early rectal cancer. This study compared long-term TAE outcomes, in terms of survival and local recurrence (LR), with total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with pathologically confirmed T1 rectal cancer.

METHODS

T1 rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent surgery from 1990 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients that were suspected to have preoperative lymph node metastasis were excluded. Demographics, recurrence, and survival were analyzed based on TAE and TME surgery.

RESULTS

Of 268 individuals, 61 patients (26%) underwent TAE, which was characterized by proximity to the anus, submucosal invasion depth, and lesion infiltration, compared with TME patients (P < 0.001-0.033). During a median follow-up of 10.4 years, 12 patients had systemic and/or LR. Ten-year cancer-specific survival in the TAE and TME groups was not significantly different (98% vs. 100%). However, the 10-year LR rate in the TAE group was greater than that of TME group (10% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Although 5 of the 6 TAE patients with LR underwent salvage surgery, one of the patients eventually died. The TAE surgical procedure (hazard ratio, 19.066; P = 0.007) was the only independent risk factor for LR.

CONCLUSION

Although long-term survival after TAE was comparable to that after TME, TAE had a greater recurrence risk than TME. Thus, TAE should only be considered as an alternative surgical option for early rectal cancer in selected patients.

摘要

目的

经肛门切除术(TAE)是早期直肠癌的一种替代手术方法。本研究比较了经病理证实为T1期直肠癌患者经肛门切除术(TAE)与全直肠系膜切除术(TME)在生存和局部复发(LR)方面的长期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析1990年至2011年接受手术的T1期直肠腺癌患者。排除术前怀疑有淋巴结转移的患者。根据TAE和TME手术分析患者的人口统计学、复发和生存情况。

结果

268例患者中,61例(26%)接受了TAE,与TME患者相比,TAE的特点是靠近肛门、黏膜下浸润深度和病变浸润情况(P < 0.001 - 0.033)。中位随访10.4年期间,12例患者出现全身和/或局部复发。TAE组和TME组的10年癌症特异性生存率无显著差异(98%对100%)。然而,TAE组的10年局部复发率高于TME组(10%对0%,P < 0.001)。虽然6例TAE局部复发患者中有5例接受了挽救性手术,但其中1例最终死亡。TAE手术操作(风险比,19.066;P = 0.007)是局部复发的唯一独立危险因素。

结论

虽然TAE术后的长期生存率与TME相当,但TAE的复发风险高于TME。因此,TAE仅应被视为特定患者早期直肠癌的一种替代手术选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcaa/6732326/3f846c8e1ab4/ac-2018-10-18-2f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验