• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德克萨斯州住院患者公共使用数据文件(PUDF)中腹腔镜结肠手术的应用情况。

Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF).

作者信息

Clapp Benjamin, Klingsporn William, Harper Brittany, Swinney Ira L, Dodoo Christopher, Davis Brian, Tyroch Alan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, TX Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso TX.

出版信息

JSLS. 2019 Jul-Sep;23(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00032.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2019.00032
PMID:31488941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6708411/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard of care for the most common surgical procedures performed. However, laparoscopic techniques have not reached this same penetrance in colorectal surgery. We wanted to determine the percentage of colon operations performed in Texas that were done via laparoscopic, robotic and open techniques.

METHODS

The Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF) was queried using ICD-9-CM diagnostic and procedure codes to determine overall utilization of laparoscopic colectomies (LC) in Texas between 2013-14 for reporting facilities. We specifically looked at cost and the length of stay for LC, open colectomy (OC) and robotic assisted colectomy (RAC).

RESULTS

In the state of Texas between 2013-14 there were 20,454 colectomies performed. Of these 12,328 (60.3%) were OC, 7,536 (36.8%) were LC, and 590 (3.9%) were RAC. Average total cost was $117,113 for OC, $75,741.9 for LC, and $81,996.2 for RAC. Average length of stay for each technique was 10.6 days for OC, 6.1 days for LC, and 5.1 days for RAC. The risk of a postoperative complication occurring was higher in the open procedure than a laparoscopic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

LC accounted for only 36.8% of all colectomies performed in Texas between 2013-14. OC costs twice as much as LC and increased the length of stay by nearly 4 d. LC and RAC are both associated with significantly less cost and length of stay for patients undergoing surgery, while lowering perioperative complications.

DISCLOSURES

None of the authors have any relevant disclosures.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术已成为大多数常见外科手术的标准治疗方式。然而,腹腔镜技术在结直肠手术中的普及程度尚未达到相同水平。我们希望确定在德克萨斯州通过腹腔镜、机器人和开放技术进行的结肠手术的比例。

方法

使用ICD - 9 - CM诊断和手术编码查询德克萨斯州住院患者公共使用数据文件(PUDF),以确定2013 - 2014年间德克萨斯州报告机构腹腔镜结肠切除术(LC)的总体使用情况。我们特别关注了LC、开放结肠切除术(OC)和机器人辅助结肠切除术(RAC)的成本和住院时间。

结果

在2013 - 2014年间,德克萨斯州共进行了20454例结肠切除术。其中,12328例(60.3%)为OC,7536例(36.8%)为LC,590例(3.9%)为RAC。OC的平均总成本为117113美元,LC为75741.9美元,RAC为81996.2美元。每种技术的平均住院时间分别为:OC为10.6天,LC为6.1天,RAC为5.1天。开放手术术后发生并发症的风险高于腹腔镜手术。

结论

在2013 - 2014年间,LC仅占德克萨斯州所有结肠切除术的36.8%。OC的成本是LC的两倍,住院时间增加了近4天。LC和RAC对于接受手术的患者而言,成本和住院时间均显著降低,同时降低了围手术期并发症。

披露

所有作者均无相关披露。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7a2/6708411/b363977635e2/jls0201638030002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7a2/6708411/45f4794421a9/jls0201638030001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7a2/6708411/b363977635e2/jls0201638030002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7a2/6708411/45f4794421a9/jls0201638030001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7a2/6708411/b363977635e2/jls0201638030002.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF).德克萨斯州住院患者公共使用数据文件(PUDF)中腹腔镜结肠手术的应用情况。
JSLS. 2019 Jul-Sep;23(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00032.
2
Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.利用大型全国性数据库比较开放、腹腔镜和机器人结肠切除术:与手术中心手术量相关的结果和趋势
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Jun;59(6):535-42. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000580.
3
The impact of operative approach on postoperative outcomes and healthcare utilization after colectomy.手术入路对结肠切除术后结局和医疗保健利用的影响。
Surgery. 2022 Feb;171(2):320-327. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
Surgical Outcomes and Utilization of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Techniques for Elective Colectomy in Asian American and Native Hawaiian-Pacific Islanders (AAPI) Diagnosed With Colon Cancer.亚洲裔美国人和夏威夷原住民-太平洋岛民(AAPI)中诊断为结肠癌的患者行择期结肠切除术的腹腔镜与机器人技术的手术结果和利用比较。
J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.007. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
5
A comparative analysis of outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic elective (procto-) colectomies for benign and malignant disease.开腹、腹腔镜和机器人择期(直肠-)结肠切除术治疗良恶性疾病的结局比较分析。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01069-4. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
6
Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching.微创结肠切除术是否优于传统方法?:首次采用倾向评分匹配的全国综合检查。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Feb;149(2):177-84. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3660.
7
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy: cost and clinical outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜结肠切除术:成本与临床结果
JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):211-24. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13753907291035.
8
Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience.机器人与腹腔镜结直肠手术:机构经验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):956-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1977-6. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
9
Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Colectomy Results in Increased Operative Time Without Improved Perioperative Outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜结肠切除术相比,手术时间增加,围手术期结局并未改善。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Aug;20(8):1503-10. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3124-0. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
10
Current use and surgical efficacy of laparoscopic colectomy in colon cancer.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床应用及疗效观察。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jul;217(1):56-62; discussion 62-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
On the fidelity versus privacy and utility trade-off of synthetic patient data.论合成患者数据的保真度与隐私及效用之间的权衡
iScience. 2025 Apr 14;28(5):112382. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112382. eCollection 2025 May 16.
2
Comparison of syndromic surveillance and hospital discharge data for unintentional drowning in metropolitan Houston, Texas, USA.美国得克萨斯州休斯敦市城区意外溺水综合征监测与医院出院数据比较
Inj Prev. 2025 Mar 20;31(2):151-157. doi: 10.1136/ip-2024-045301.
3
Healthcare reform: let science, not politics, lead the way.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.预测增加直肠癌腹腔镜利用的机会。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1556-1563. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5844-y. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
Barriers to laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: a national analysis.腹腔镜结肠癌切除术的障碍:一项全国性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5782-8. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
3
Respiratory complications after colonic procedures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does laparoscopy offer a benefit?
医疗改革:让科学而非政治引领方向。
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 May;40(Suppl 1):S48-S49. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00283.0040. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Robotic ambulatory colorectal resections: a systematic review.机器人辅助结直肠切除术:系统综述。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 7;18(1):202. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01961-3.
5
Outcomes of thoracic aortic interventions in Marfan syndrome in the state of Texas over 11 years.德克萨斯州11年间马凡综合征患者胸主动脉介入治疗的结果。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Aug 3;37(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad128.
6
All-cause 30- and 90-day inpatient readmission costs associated with 4 minimally invasive colon surgery approaches: A propensity-matched analysis using Medicare and commercial claims data.4种微创结肠手术方法相关的全因30天和90天住院再入院费用:一项使用医疗保险和商业理赔数据的倾向匹配分析。
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Sep 25;10:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.09.007. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
[Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: experience with an original technique].[手辅助腹腔镜手术:一种原创技术的经验]
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2022 Jun 6;79(2):150-155. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n2.35412.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者行结肠手术后的呼吸系统并发症:腹腔镜手术是否有益?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1280-1285. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5805-5. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
4
Participation of Colon and Rectal Fellows in Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery: Effect on Surgical Outcomes.结肠直肠专科住院医师参与机器人直肠癌手术:对手术结果的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Mar-Apr;75(2):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
5
Variations in Laparoscopic Colectomy Utilization in the United States.美国腹腔镜结肠切除术应用情况的差异
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Oct;58(10):950-6. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000448.
6
Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching.微创结肠切除术是否优于传统方法?:首次采用倾向评分匹配的全国综合检查。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Feb;149(2):177-84. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3660.
7
Laparoscopic colon resection: is it being utilized?腹腔镜结肠切除术:它正在被使用吗?
Adv Surg. 2013;47:29-43. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2013.02.003.
8
Are open abdominal procedures a thing of the past? An analysis of graduating general surgery residents' case logs from 2000 to 2011.开放性腹部手术是否已成过去式?对 2000 年至 2011 年毕业的普通外科住院医师病例记录的分析。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;70(6):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.002.
9
Growth of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States: analysis of regional and socioeconomic factors over time.美国腹腔镜结肠切除术的发展:随时间变化的区域性和社会经济因素分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):270-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828faa66.
10
Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers.腹腔镜结肠切除术在利用方面的趋势和转为开放手术的比率:对学术医疗中心的国家数据库审查。
Ann Surg. 2012 Sep;256(3):462-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182657ec5.