• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[手辅助腹腔镜手术:一种原创技术的经验]

[Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: experience with an original technique].

作者信息

Vaccaro Carlos, Gonzalez Marcos, Ruffa Tatiana, Campana Juan Pablo, Mentz Ricardo, Poggi Catalina, Rubinstein Fernando, Marcello Peter

机构信息

Hospital italiano de buenos aires.

Instituto de efectividad clinica y sanitaria.

出版信息

Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2022 Jun 6;79(2):150-155. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n2.35412.

DOI:10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n2.35412
PMID:35700458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9426329/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (HALS) is an alternative to straight laparoscopic approach (SL) that requires the use of a specific device to maintain the pneumoperitoneum. Our group has described an original double glove technique to replace it. Our purpose was to compare perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing HALS using this original technique vs SL.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospective database including patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal resections between 2004 to 2020 at the Hospital Italiano, Argentina. Logistic regression analysis, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting were used to estimate adjusted treatment effects for perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

HALS (n=458) and SL (n=1692) cases were demographically similar. HALS was associated with a shorter operative time (170.3 vs 206.9 minutes, p<0.001). Such difference was even more pronounced in obese (44.1 min), large patients (37.5 min), complex procedures (33.8 min) and surgeries carried out by non-trained surgeons (57,6 vs 31,6 minutes, p<0.001). Hand-assisted was associated with a lower conversion rate (5% vs 9.9%, p<0.001) with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.45 (95%CI 0.28-0.73). No difference in hospital stay, morbidity, and readmission rates was found.

CONCLUSIONS

HALS with double-glove technique is comparable to SL in terms of postoperative outcomes keeping reduced operative time and conversion rates, especially in obese patients undergoing complex procedures.

摘要

引言

手辅助腹腔镜结直肠手术(HALS)是传统腹腔镜手术(SL)的一种替代方法,后者需要使用特定设备来维持气腹状态。我们团队描述了一种原创的双层手套技术来替代该设备。我们的目的是比较采用这种原创技术的HALS患者与SL患者的围手术期结局。

方法

对一个前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析,该数据库纳入了2004年至2020年在阿根廷意大利医院接受择期腹腔镜结直肠切除术的患者。采用逻辑回归分析、倾向评分匹配和逆概率加权来估计围手术期结局的调整治疗效果。

结果

HALS组(n = 458)和SL组(n = 1692)在人口统计学特征上相似。HALS与较短的手术时间相关(170.3分钟对206.9分钟,p < 0.001)。这种差异在肥胖患者(44.1分钟)、体型较大的患者(37.5分钟)、复杂手术(33.8分钟)以及由非训练有素的外科医生进行的手术中更为明显(57.6分钟对31.6分钟,p < 0.001)。手辅助与较低的中转率相关(5%对9.9%,p < 0.001),调整后的优势比为0.45(95%CI 0.28 - 0.73)。在住院时间、发病率和再入院率方面未发现差异。

结论

采用双层手套技术的HALS在术后结局方面与SL相当,同时手术时间和中转率降低,尤其是在接受复杂手术的肥胖患者中。

相似文献

1
[Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: experience with an original technique].[手辅助腹腔镜手术:一种原创技术的经验]
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2022 Jun 6;79(2):150-155. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n2.35412.
2
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for obese patients: decreased conversions with the hand-assisted technique.肥胖患者的腹腔镜结直肠手术:手助技术可降低中转开腹率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):548-54. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2089-x. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
3
Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.手辅助与腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术:微创结直肠手术的实践模式与临床结果
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4.
4
A propensity-matched study of full laparoscopic versus hand-assisted minimal-invasive liver surgery.一项关于全腹腔镜与手辅助微创肝脏手术的倾向匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2021-2028. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07597-2. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group.手辅助腹腔镜手术与标准腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病的前瞻性随机试验。手辅助腹腔镜手术研究组
Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):896-901.
6
Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery: determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery.手辅助腹腔镜结肠和直肠手术的技术熟练程度:确定达到精通需要多少病例。
Arch Surg. 2012 Apr;147(4):317-22. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.879. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
7
The Feasibility of Hand-assisted Laparoscopic and Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection Compared With Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer.手辅助腹腔镜和腹腔镜多脏器切除术与开放手术治疗局部进展期结直肠癌的可行性比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):e57-e65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000428.
8
Does nasogastric tube decompression get used less often with laparoscopic and hand-assisted compared with open colectomy?与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜和手助腹腔镜结直肠切除术后使用鼻胃管减压的情况是否较少?
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4564-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3124-z. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
9
It Is Not Just Cosmesis: Straight Laparoscopy with Stoma Site Extraction Improves Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Undergoing Total Colectomy.这不仅仅关乎美观:经造口部位提取的直接腹腔镜手术可改善接受全结肠切除术的溃疡性结肠炎患者的预后。
Am Surg. 2019 Oct 1;85(10):1194-1197.
10
Laparoscopic treatment of splenomegaly: a case for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜治疗脾肿大:手辅助腹腔镜手术的一个实例
Arch Surg. 2011 Jul;146(7):818-23. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.149.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF).德克萨斯州住院患者公共使用数据文件(PUDF)中腹腔镜结肠手术的应用情况。
JSLS. 2019 Jul-Sep;23(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00032.
2
Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections in the obese: a systematic review.肥胖患者的腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术:一项系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2072-2088. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5209-y. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3
Comparison of straight vs hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: an assessment from the NSQIP procedure-targeted cohort.直式与手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术的比较:来自国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)程序针对性队列的评估
Am J Surg. 2016 Sep;212(3):406-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.026. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
Incidence of minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers.美国国立综合癌症网络中心的微创结直肠癌手术发生率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 19;107(1):362. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju362. Print 2015 Jan.
5
Geographic variation in use of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.结肠癌腹腔镜结肠切除术使用情况的地域差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 10;32(32):3667-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.1588. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
6
Laparoscopic colorectal resections: a simple predictor model and a stratification risk for conversion to open surgery.腹腔镜结直肠切除术:一种简单的预测模型和中转开腹的分层风险。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jul;57(7):869-74. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000137.
7
National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer.腹腔镜结直肠手术治疗结肠癌的全国差异。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3160-8. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
8
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for obese patients: decreased conversions with the hand-assisted technique.肥胖患者的腹腔镜结直肠手术:手助技术可降低中转开腹率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):548-54. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2089-x. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
9
Body surface area: a new predictor factor for conversion and prolonged operative time in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.体表面积:腹腔镜结直肠手术中转和手术时间延长的新预测因素。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Nov;55(11):1153-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182686230.
10
Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery.结直肠手术中手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD006585. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006585.pub2.