Suppr超能文献

用于原位口腔生物膜生长的口腔矫治器:一项系统评价。

Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review.

作者信息

Abdullah Nizam, Al-Marzooq Farah, Mohamad Suharni, Abd Rahman Normastura, Chi Ngo Hien, Perera Samaranayake Lakshman

机构信息

College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.

School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Oral Microbiol. 2019 Aug 6;11(1):1647757. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2019.1647757. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

: Oral biofilms are the root cause of major oral diseases. As biofilms are not representative of the intraoral milieu, various devices have been manufactured over the years to develop Appliance Grown Oral Biofilm (AGOB). : To review various intraoral appliances used to develop AGOB for microbiological analysis, and to judge the optimal means for such analyses. : Four databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Medline) were searched by two independent reviewers, and articles featuring the key words 'device' OR 'splint' OR 'appliance'; 'Oral biofilm' OR 'dental plaque'; '' OR ''; 'Microbiology' OR 'Bacteria' OR 'microbiome'; were included. The standard Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) were adopted for data gathering. : Of the 517 articles which met the initial inclusion criteria, 24 were deemed eligible for review. The age of the AGOB, sampled at various intervals, ranged from 30 min to 28 days. The most commonly used microbiome analytical methods were fluorescence microscopy, total cell count using conventional, and molecular tools including Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platforms. : No uniformly superior method for collecting AGOB could be discerned. NGS platforms are preferable for AGOB analyses.

摘要

口腔生物膜是主要口腔疾病的根本原因。由于生物膜不能代表口腔内环境,多年来人们制造了各种装置来培养器具生长型口腔生物膜(AGOB)。

目的

回顾用于培养AGOB进行微生物分析的各种口腔内器具,并判断此类分析的最佳方法。

方法

两名独立评审员检索了四个数据库(PubMed、Science Direct、Scopus和Medline),纳入了关键词为“装置”或“夹板”或“器具”;“口腔生物膜”或“牙菌斑”;“微生物学”或“细菌”或“微生物组”的文章。数据收集采用系统评价和Meta分析的标准报告项目(PRISMA)。

结果

在符合初始纳入标准的517篇文章中,24篇被认为符合评审条件。在不同时间间隔采集的AGOB的培养时间从30分钟到28天不等。最常用的微生物组分析方法是荧光显微镜检查、使用传统方法的总细胞计数以及包括新一代测序(NGS)平台在内的分子工具。

结论

无法辨别出一种统一的、更优的AGOB采集方法。NGS平台更适合用于AGOB分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f80/6713217/9b5de68c5120/ZJOM_A_1647757_F0001_OC.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验