• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

萨格勒布弱视学龄前筛查研究:近视力和远视力测试提高了弱视筛查的诊断准确性。

Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening Study: near and distance visual acuity testing increase the diagnostic accuracy of screening for amblyopia.

作者信息

Bušić Mladen, Bjeloš Mirjana, Petrovečki Mladen, Kuzmanović Elabjer Biljana, Bosnar Damir, Ramić Senad, Miletić Daliborka, Andrijašević Lidija, Kondža Krstonijević Edita, Jakovljević Vid, Bišćan Tvrdi Ana, Predović Jurica, Kokot Antonio, Bišćan Filip, Kovačević Ljubić Mirna, Motušić Aras Ranka

机构信息

Mirjana Bjeloš, University Eye Clinic, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Sveti Duh 64, Zagreb, Croatia,

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2016 Feb;57(1):29-41. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.29.

DOI:10.3325/cmj.2016.57.29
PMID:26935612
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4800325/
Abstract

AIM

To present and evaluate a new screening protocol for amblyopia in preschool children.

METHODS

Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening (ZAPS) study protocol performed screening for amblyopia by near and distance visual acuity (VA) testing of 15 648 children aged 48-54 months attending kindergartens in the City of Zagreb County between September 2011 and June 2014 using Lea Symbols in lines test. If VA in either eye was >0.1 logMAR, the child was re-tested, if failed at re-test, the child was referred to comprehensive eye examination at the Eye Clinic.

RESULTS

78.04% of children passed the screening test. Estimated prevalence of amblyopia was 8.08%. Testability, sensitivity, and specificity of the ZAPS study protocol were 99.19%, 100.00%, and 96.68% respectively.

CONCLUSION

The ZAPS study used the most discriminative VA test with optotypes in line as they do not underestimate amblyopia. The estimated prevalence of amblyopia was considerably higher than reported elsewhere. To the best of our knowledge, the ZAPS study protocol reached the highest sensitivity and specificity when evaluating diagnostic accuracy of VA tests for screening. The pass level defined at ≤0.1 logMAR for 4-year-old children, using Lea Symbols in lines missed no amblyopia cases, advocating that both near and distance VA testing should be performed when screening for amblyopia.

摘要

目的

介绍并评估一种针对学龄前儿童弱视的新筛查方案。

方法

萨格勒布弱视学龄前筛查(ZAPS)研究方案,于2011年9月至2014年6月期间,采用利雅线条视力表,对萨格勒布县市内15648名年龄在48 - 54个月的幼儿园儿童进行了近视力和远视力测试,以筛查弱视。若任一眼睛的视力>0.1 logMAR,则对该儿童进行重新测试,若重新测试仍未通过,则将该儿童转至眼科诊所进行全面眼部检查。

结果

78.04%的儿童通过了筛查测试。弱视的估计患病率为8.08%。ZAPS研究方案的可测试性、敏感性和特异性分别为99.19%、100.00%和96.68%。

结论

ZAPS研究使用了最具鉴别力的视力测试方法,即线条视标,因为它们不会低估弱视情况。弱视的估计患病率明显高于其他地方的报道。据我们所知,ZAPS研究方案在评估视力测试用于筛查的诊断准确性时,达到了最高的敏感性和特异性。对于4岁儿童,使用利雅线条视力表将通过水平定义为≤0.1 logMAR时,没有漏诊任何弱视病例,这表明在筛查弱视时应同时进行近视力和远视力测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32bf/4800325/fc6ac53cfc83/CroatMedJ_57_0029-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32bf/4800325/fc6ac53cfc83/CroatMedJ_57_0029-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32bf/4800325/fc6ac53cfc83/CroatMedJ_57_0029-F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening Study: near and distance visual acuity testing increase the diagnostic accuracy of screening for amblyopia.萨格勒布弱视学龄前筛查研究:近视力和远视力测试提高了弱视筛查的诊断准确性。
Croat Med J. 2016 Feb;57(1):29-41. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.29.
2
Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.使用拥挤的HOTV和Lea符号视力测试对学龄前儿童进行阈值视力测试。
J AAPOS. 2003 Dec;7(6):396-9. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(03)00211-8.
3
Performance of the Lea symbols chart for screening Nigerian children aged 3 to 5 years.用于筛查3至5岁尼日利亚儿童的利氏符号视力表的性能。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Oct;23(10):1381-1386. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_204_19.
4
Should tumbling E go out of date in amblyopia screening? Evidence from a population-based sample normative in children aged 3-4 years.翻转 E 视力表在弱视筛查中是否已经过时?基于人群的 3-4 岁儿童正常值的证据。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;102(6):761-766. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310691. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
5
Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.初步报告:使用利氏符号对幼儿进行检查。
Strabismus. 2000 Sep;8(3):209-13.
6
Evaluation of vision screening of 5-15-year-old children in three Tongan schools: comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and Lea symbols.评价 3 所汤加学校 5-15 岁儿童视力筛查:奥克兰视力图和 Lea 符号的比较。
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 May;103(3):353-360. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12958. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
7
High rate of failed visual-acuity measurements with the Amsterdam Picture Chart in screening at the age of 36 months.在 36 个月龄的筛查中,使用阿姆斯特丹图片图表进行视力测量的失败率很高。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;97(1):24-28. doi: 10.1111/aos.13898. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
8
Evaluation of vision screening in five- to eight-year-old children living in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden - a prospective multicentre study.瑞典西约塔兰地区 5 至 8 岁儿童视力筛查评估-一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;97(2):158-164. doi: 10.1111/aos.13900. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
9
10
Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.在学龄前儿童视力研究中,由持牌眼保健专业人员进行的学龄前视力筛查测试的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2004 Apr;111(4):637-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling Visual Acuity in 58,712 Four-Year-Olds: Standardized Assessment Defined Normative Visual Acuity Threshold.揭示58712名四岁儿童的视力:标准化评估确定了正常视力阈值。
Vision (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;8(2):39. doi: 10.3390/vision8020039.
2
Effectiveness of a Recertification Vision Screening Training Module for Preschool Teachers.针对学前教师的再认证视力筛查培训模块的有效性。
Malays J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;30(6):147-155. doi: 10.21315/mjms2023.30.6.14. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
Macular perfusion normative data acquired with optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy four-year-old Caucasian children.

本文引用的文献

1
Determination of Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Screening Tests using a Mathematical Formula in Place of Invasive Blood Tests.使用数学公式替代侵入性血液检测的筛查试验确定2型糖尿病患病率
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jan;10(1):LC05-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/14812.7039. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
2
The Prevalence of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in the United States.美国潜伏性结核病感染的流行率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug 15;194(4):501-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1683OC.
3
The prevalence of amblyopia in Germany: data from the prospective, population-based Gutenberg Health Study.
健康的四岁白种人儿童的光学相干断层扫描血管造影获得的黄斑灌注正常数据。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 5;21(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02122-y.
4
Comparison between distance and near visual acuity in amblyopes.弱视患者远视力与近视力的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 13;99(46):e23111. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023111.
5
Reply to Letter - Comparison of the Pediatric Vision Screening Program in 18 Countries across Five Continents.对信件的回复 - 五大洲18个国家儿科视力筛查项目的比较
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 23;32(1):120-121. doi: 10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_52_20. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
6
Comment on the Article: Comparison of the Pediatric Vision Screening Program in 18 Countries Across Five Continents.对文章《五大洲18个国家儿童视力筛查项目的比较》的评论
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 23;32(1):119. doi: 10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_51_20. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
7
Comparison of the pediatric vision screening program in 18 countries across five continents.五大洲18个国家儿童视力筛查项目的比较。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 3;31(4):357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.07.006. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Impact of Children's Postural Variation on Viewing Distance and Estimated Visual Acuity.儿童姿势变化对观看距离和估计视力的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Jan 30;8(1):16. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.1.16. eCollection 2019 Jan.
9
Normative visual acuity in Chinese preschoolers aged 36 to <48 months as measured with the linear HOTV chart: the Yuhuatai Pediatric Eye Disease Study.用线性HOTV视力表测量中国36至<48月龄学龄前儿童的正常视力:雨花台小儿眼病研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 9;7(7):e014866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014866.
10
Childhood amblyopia: current management and new trends.儿童弱视:当前的治疗与新趋势
Br Med Bull. 2016 Sep;119(1):75-86. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw030. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
德国弱视的患病率:来自基于人群的前瞻性古登堡健康研究的数据。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 May 8;112(19):338-44. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0338.
4
Normative distribution of visual acuity in 3- to 6-year-old Chinese preschoolers: the Shenzhen kindergarten eye study.3至6岁中国学龄前儿童视力的正态分布:深圳幼儿园视力研究
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Feb 24;56(3):1985-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15422.
5
Vision screening for children 36 to <72 months: recommended practices.36至未满72个月儿童的视力筛查:推荐做法。
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jan;92(1):6-16. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000429.
6
A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.字母识别的敏锐度和拥挤度限制的双重分离以及改进视力筛查的前景。
J Vis. 2014 May 5;14(5):3. doi: 10.1167/14.5.3.
7
Risk factors for astigmatism in the Vision in Preschoolers Study.学龄前儿童视力研究中散光的危险因素。
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 May;91(5):514-21. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000242.
8
Normative visual acuity in infants and preschool-aged children in Sydney.悉尼婴幼儿及学龄前儿童的正常视力
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;92(7):e521-9. doi: 10.1111/aos.12366. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
9
Prevalence, causes and associations of amblyopia in year 1 students in Central China : The Anyang childhood eye study (ACES).华中地区一年级学生弱视的患病率、病因及相关因素:安阳儿童眼研究(ACES)。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;252(1):137-43. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2451-z. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
10
Risk factors for amblyopia in the vision in preschoolers study.学龄前儿童视力研究中的弱视风险因素。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Mar;121(3):622-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 18.