Foundation for Professional Development, Health Systems Strengthening Division, Pretoria, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand, School of Public Health, Johannesburg, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0221215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221215. eCollection 2019.
To increase HIV case finding in a Community-based HIV counselling and testing (CBCT) programme, an index client tracing modality was implemented to target index clients' sexual network and household members.
To compare index client tracing modality's outcomes with other CBCT recruitment modalities (mobile, workplace, homebased), 2015-2017.
Trained HIV counsellors identified HIV positive clients either through offering HIV tests to children and sexual partners of an HIV index client, or randomly offering HIV tests to anyone available in the community (mobile, home-based or workplace). Socio-demographic information and test results were recorded. Descriptive comparisons of client HIV test uptake and positivity were conducted by method of recruitment-index client tracing vs non-targeted community outreach.
Of the 1 282 369 people who tested for HIV overall, the index modality tested 3.9% of them, 1.9% in year 1 and 6.0% in year 2. The index modality tested more females than males (55.8% vs 44.2%) overall and in each year; tested higher proportions of children than other modalities: 10.1% vs 2.6% among 1-4 years, 12.2% vs 2.6% among the 5-9 years and 9.6% vs 3.4% among the 10-15 years. The index modality identified higher HIV positivity proportions than other modalities overall (10.3% 95%CI 10.0-10.6 vs. 7.3% 95%CI 7.25-7.36), in year 1 (9.4%; 8.9-9.9 vs 6.5%; 6.45-6.57) and year 2 (10.6%; 10.3-10.9 vs 8.2%; 8.09-8.23). Higher proportions of females (7.5%;7.4-7.5) than males (5.5%;5.4-5.5) tested positive overall. Positivity increased by age up to 49y with year 2's increased targeting of sexual partners. Overall linkage to care rose from 33.3% in year 1 to 78.9% in year 2.
Index testing was less effective in reaching large numbers of clients, but more effective in reaching children and identifying HIV positive people than other modalities. Targeting HIV positive people's partners and children increases HIV case finding.
为了在社区艾滋病咨询和检测(CBCT)项目中增加艾滋病毒病例发现,实施了索引客户追踪模式,以针对索引客户的性网络和家庭成员。
比较索引客户追踪模式与其他 CBCT 招募模式(移动、工作场所、家庭为基础)的结果,2015-2017 年。
经过培训的艾滋病毒咨询师通过向艾滋病毒索引客户的儿童和性伴侣提供艾滋病毒检测,或者随机向社区中任何可用的人(移动、家庭或工作场所)提供艾滋病毒检测,确定艾滋病毒阳性客户。记录社会人口统计学信息和检测结果。通过招募-索引客户追踪与非目标社区外展的方法,对客户艾滋病毒检测率和阳性率进行描述性比较。
在总共接受艾滋病毒检测的 1282369 人中,索引模式检测了 3.9%,第 1 年为 1.9%,第 2 年为 6.0%。总体而言,索引模式检测到的女性比例高于男性(55.8%比 44.2%),每年均如此;检测到的儿童比例高于其他模式:1-4 岁为 10.1%比 2.6%,5-9 岁为 12.2%比 2.6%,10-15 岁为 9.6%比 3.4%。索引模式总体上比其他模式识别出更高的艾滋病毒阳性比例(10.3%95%CI10.0-10.6%比 7.3%95%CI7.25-7.36%),第 1 年(9.4%8.9-9.9%比 6.5%6.45-6.57%)和第 2 年(10.6%10.3-10.9%比 8.2%8.09-8.23%)。总体而言,女性(7.5%7.4-7.5%)阳性检测比例高于男性(5.5%5.4-5.5%)。阳性率随年龄增长至 49 岁,第 2 年增加了对性伴侣的针对性。总体而言,从第 1 年的 33.3%到第 2 年的 78.9%,与护理的联系增加。
索引检测在接触大量客户方面效果较差,但在接触儿童和发现艾滋病毒阳性者方面比其他模式更有效。针对艾滋病毒阳性者的伴侣和儿童,可增加艾滋病毒病例发现。