• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

靶向活检时代下活检与根治性前列腺切除术病理的一致性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Feb;3(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.001
PMID:31492650
Abstract

CONTEXT

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy (TBx) may better predict pathology at radical prostatectomy than systematic transrectal prostate biopsy (SBx).

OBJECTIVE

To assess concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology in men undergoing a TBx as compared with those undergoing an SBx.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, the Cochrane Library [Wiley], and EBSCHOHost) were searched from inception until July 2018. Studies were included if they were published after 2012, conducted both SBx and TBx, and compared the biopsy results with final pathology after radical prostatectomy for ≥50 patients. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized. Bias was appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Our search yielded 10 studies including 1215 men. However, our inclusion criteria applied only to a proportion of men included in these studies. The median age was 65 yr and the median prostate-specific antigen level was 7.2 ng/ml. In the eight studies examining upgrading at prostatectomy, pathology from SBx was significantly more likely to be upgraded relative to TBx (odds ratio [OR] 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-4.14, p =  0.001). We found no significant difference in downgrading (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.48-2.67, p =  0.783) between TBx and SBx. For both biopsy-naïve men and men with a prior negative biopsy, results from SBx were more likely to be upgraded than TBx at prostatectomy (OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.02-2.27, p <  0.001] and OR 4.23 [95% CI 1.68-8.48, p =  0.003], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologic upgrading at prostatectomy was less likely with mpMRI-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy alone, without concurrent increase in downgrading. This increased accuracy should improve confidence in management decisions based on MRI-targeted biopsy pathology.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging -targeted biopsy to predict cancer grade at radical prostatectomy. We found that targeted biopsy provides more accurate assessment of Gleason score at prostatectomy than systematic biopsy.

摘要

背景

与系统经直肠前列腺活检(SBx)相比,多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)靶向经直肠前列腺活检(TBx)可能更能预测前列腺根治性切除术的病理结果。

目的

评估 TBx 与 SBx 相比,在接受前列腺活检的男性中与根治性前列腺切除术的病理结果的一致性。

证据采集

从 2018 年 7 月开始,在四个电子数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆[Wiley]和 EBSCHOHost)中进行了搜索。如果研究发表于 2012 年之后,同时进行了 SBx 和 TBx,并对至少 50 名患者的根治性前列腺切除术后的活检结果与最终病理进行了比较,则纳入研究。使用了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。使用诊断准确性研究的质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)工具评估偏倚。

证据综合

我们的搜索结果包括 10 项研究,共 1215 名男性。然而,我们的纳入标准仅适用于这些研究中纳入的一部分男性。中位年龄为 65 岁,中位前列腺特异性抗原水平为 7.2ng/ml。在八项研究中,对前列腺切除术的升级进行了检查,与 TBx 相比,SBx 的病理升级更有可能(优势比[OR]2.47,95%置信区间[CI]1.48-4.14,p=0.001)。我们发现 TBx 和 SBx 之间在降级(OR 1.13,95%CI 0.48-2.67,p=0.783)方面无显著差异。对于初次活检和初次活检阴性的男性,与 TBx 相比,SBx 在前列腺切除术后更有可能升级(OR 1.6[95%CI 1.02-2.27,p<0.001]和 OR 4.23[95%CI 1.68-8.48,p=0.003])。

结论

与单独的系统活检相比,mpMRI 靶向活检术发生前列腺切除术病理性升级的可能性较小,而降级的可能性没有增加。这种准确性的提高应该会提高基于 MRI 靶向活检病理的管理决策的信心。

患者总结

我们回顾了多参数磁共振成像-靶向活检术预测前列腺根治性切除术时癌症分级的能力。我们发现,与系统活检相比,靶向活检术提供了更准确的前列腺切除术 Gleason 评分评估。

相似文献

1
Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.靶向活检时代下活检与根治性前列腺切除术病理的一致性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Feb;3(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
The Highest Grade Group Does Not Drive the Risk of Recurrence when Systematic and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-targeted Biopsies are Discordant: Preliminary Findings Using Radical Prostatectomy Pathology as a Surrogate for MRI-targeted Biopsy Grade.当系统和多参数磁共振成像(MRI)靶向活检结果不一致时,最高分级组不会增加复发风险:以 MRI 靶向活检分级为替代指标的根治性前列腺切除术病理的初步发现。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 May;10(3):486-488. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy.系统穿刺活检对接受多参数 MRI 靶向穿刺活检的疑似前列腺癌患者的附加价值。
Urol Oncol. 2019 May;37(5):298.e1-298.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
4
Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.在未经前列腺活检的患者中进行前列腺癌风险评估:多参数磁共振成像-经直肠超声(TRUS)融合活检和系统 TRUS 活检中的鹿特丹前列腺癌风险计算器。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.TRUS 与 MRI 靶向联合系统前列腺活检在活检与根治性前列腺切除术病理一致性方面的比较。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Mar;75(3):e13797. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13797. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
6
Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.经会阴与经直肠途径前列腺系统模板整合磁共振融合靶向穿刺与根治性前列腺切除术标本间 Gleason 分级分组一致性比较。
Urology. 2023 May;175:151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
7
Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.经会阴模板引导式饱和与靶向前列腺活检的男性前列腺癌检出率。
Prostate. 2022 Feb;82(3):388-396. doi: 10.1002/pros.24286. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振成像靶向活检可能比标准经直肠超声引导活检更能提高显著前列腺癌检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):438-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.037. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
9
Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.经会阴与经直肠磁共振成像靶向活检对行根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者在最终病理升级风险方面是否存在影响?一项欧洲泌尿外科学会-青年泌尿外科医生前列腺癌工作组多机构研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Jul;9(4):621-628. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.016. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
10
Targeted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Quantitative Gleason 4 Grading Prediction in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidate Selection.靶向多参数磁共振成像/超声融合活检在根治性前列腺切除标本中对定量 Gleason 4 分级预测的应用:对主动监测候选者选择的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Mar;9(2):303-308. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
An MRI-pathology foundation model for noninvasive diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer.用于前列腺癌无创诊断和分级的磁共振成像-病理基础模型
Nat Cancer. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1038/s43018-025-01041-x.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and accuracy with radical prostatectomy specimens: a grading issue.磁共振成像靶向活检与前列腺癌根治术标本的准确性:分级问题
World J Urol. 2025 Jul 25;43(1):456. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05787-y.
3
Advances and Challenges in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review.前列腺癌诊断的进展与挑战:全面综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;17(13):2137. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132137.
4
The Role of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Applied to Staging PSMA PET in Assessing Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.放射组学和人工智能在前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层显像分期评估前列腺癌侵袭性中的作用
J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3318. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103318.
5
The Role of Radiomics in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Era: A Systematic Review.影像组学在PI-RADS v2和v2.1时代预测临床显著前列腺癌中的作用:一项系统综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 24;16(17):2951. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172951.
6
Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy from primary tumour characteristics.从原发肿瘤特征预测根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发。
BJU Int. 2024 Dec;134 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47-55. doi: 10.1111/bju.16482. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
7
Risk of Cancer-related Death for Men with Biopsy Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer and High-risk Features: A European Multi-institutional Study.活检1级前列腺癌且具有高危特征男性的癌症相关死亡风险:一项欧洲多机构研究。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Jun 26;66:33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.001. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Can a nomogram predict apical prostate cancer pathology upgrade from fusion biopsy to final pathology? A multicenter study.是否可以通过融合活检到最终病理的Nomogram 预测前列腺癌的尖部升级?一项多中心研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jun;13(11):e7341. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7341.
9
Development and Validation of an Explainable Radiomics Model to Predict High-Aggressive Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Radiomics Study Based on Biparametric MRI.一种用于预测高侵袭性前列腺癌的可解释性放射组学模型的开发与验证:一项基于双参数MRI的多中心放射组学研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 1;16(1):203. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010203.
10
Reliability of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies versus Prostatectomy.系统活检和靶向活检与前列腺切除术的可靠性
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Dec 6;10(12):1395. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10121395.