• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

STIMUL 扩展简化评分与简化评分预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者两年死亡风险的评估与比较

Evaluation and Comparison of the STIMUL Extended and Simplified Risk Scores for Predicting Two-Year Death in Patients Following ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Department of Military Therapy of the Ukrainian Military Medical Academy, 01015 Kyiv, Ukraine.

Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology, Laboratory of Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 10;57(12):1349. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121349.

DOI:10.3390/medicina57121349
PMID:34946294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8707946/
Abstract

The management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requires a patient's long-term risk to be estimated. The objective of this study was to develop extended and simplified models of two-year death risk estimation following STEMI that include and exclude cardiac troponins as prognostic factors and to compare their performance with each other. : Extended and simplified multivariable logistic regression models were elaborated using 1103 patients with STEMI enrolled and followed up in the STIMUL (ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarctions in Ukraine and their Lethality) registry. Results: The extended STIMUL risk score includes seven independent risk factors: age; Killip class ≥ II at admission; resuscitated cardiac arrest; non-reperfused infarct-related artery; troponin I ≥ 150.0 ng/L; diabetes mellitus; and history of congestive heart failure. The exclusion of cardiac troponin in the simplified model did not influence the predictive value of each factor. Both models divide patients into low, moderate, and high risk groups with a C-statistic of 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.93; < 0.001) for the extended STIMUL model and a C-statistic of 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.99; < 0.001) for the simplified model. However, the addition of the level of troponin I to the model increased its prognostic value by 10.7%. : The STIMUL extended and simplified risk estimation models perform well in the prediction of two-year death risk following STEMI. The simplified version may be useful when clinicians do not know the value of cardiac troponins among the population of STEMI patients.

摘要

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的管理需要估计患者的长期风险。本研究的目的是开发包含和排除心脏肌钙蛋白作为预后因素的两种用于估计 STEMI 后两年死亡风险的扩展和简化模型,并比较它们的性能。方法:使用纳入和随访于 STIMUL(乌克兰 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死及其致死率)注册研究的 1103 例 STEMI 患者,制定了扩展和简化的多变量逻辑回归模型。结果:扩展的 STIMUL 风险评分包含 7 个独立的危险因素:年龄;入院时 Killip 分级≥II 级;复苏性心脏骤停;未再灌注梗死相关动脉;肌钙蛋白 I≥150.0ng/L;糖尿病;充血性心力衰竭病史。简化模型中排除心脏肌钙蛋白并不影响各因素的预测价值。两种模型均将患者分为低危、中危和高危组,扩展 STIMUL 模型的 C 统计量为 0.89(95%CI 0.84-0.93;<0.001),简化模型的 C 统计量为 0.86(95%CI 0.83-0.99;<0.001)。然而,肌钙蛋白 I 水平的加入增加了模型 10.7%的预后价值。结论:STIMUL 扩展和简化风险评估模型在预测 STEMI 后两年死亡风险方面表现良好。当临床医生不知道 STEMI 患者人群中心脏肌钙蛋白的值时,简化版本可能会很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/0d267db7d9c4/medicina-57-01349-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/7d09dc69bbe0/medicina-57-01349-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/3b2aba6cd412/medicina-57-01349-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/855f00104cff/medicina-57-01349-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/646b47049155/medicina-57-01349-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/0d267db7d9c4/medicina-57-01349-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/7d09dc69bbe0/medicina-57-01349-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/3b2aba6cd412/medicina-57-01349-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/855f00104cff/medicina-57-01349-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/646b47049155/medicina-57-01349-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d7/8707946/0d267db7d9c4/medicina-57-01349-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation and Comparison of the STIMUL Extended and Simplified Risk Scores for Predicting Two-Year Death in Patients Following ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.STIMUL 扩展简化评分与简化评分预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者两年死亡风险的评估与比较
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 10;57(12):1349. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121349.
2
Prognostic Value of New-Generation Troponins in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Modern Era: The RUTI-STEMI Study.新型肌钙蛋白在现代 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的预后价值:RUTI-STEMI 研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Dec 23;6(12):e007252. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007252.
3
Risk Scoring System for Prognosis Estimation of Multivessel Disease Among Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支血管病变预后评估的风险评分系统
Int Heart J. 2019 May 30;60(3):708-714. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-337. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
Complete versus simplified Selvester QRS score for infarct severity assessment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.完整与简化 Selvester QRS 评分在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的梗死严重程度评估。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1230-0.
5
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果:BVS-EXAMINATION 研究(生物可吸收血管支架——依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.005.
6
Early or deferred cardiovascular magnetic resonance after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction for effective risk stratification.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者早期或延迟行心血管磁共振检查进行有效危险分层。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):632-639. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jez179.
7
Predictors of mortality in patients with non-anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.非前壁 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者死亡的预测因素:来自 HORIZONS-AMI 试验的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug 1;94(2):172-180. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28096. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
[The prognostic value of myocardial infarct size measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction].[心血管磁共振测量的心肌梗死面积对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后价值]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 1;60(8):751-756. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20201102-00915.
9
MEDICATION ADHERENCE AND ITS IMPACT ON THE AVERAGE LIFE EXPECTANCY AFTER ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: THE RESULTS OF THE UKRAINIAN STIMUL REGISTRY.药物依从性及其对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者平均预期寿命的影响:乌克兰 STIMUL 注册研究结果。
Wiad Lek. 2022;75(3):563-569.
10
Prognostic impact of prepercutaneous coronary intervention TIMI flow in patients with ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Results from the FAST-MI 2010 registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 TIMI 血流对 ST 段抬高和非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死患者预后的影响:来自 FAST-MI 2010 注册研究的结果。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;111(2):101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation and comparison of six GRACE models for the stratification of undifferentiated chest pain in the emergency department.评估和比较六个 GRACE 模型在急诊科对未分化胸痛的分层作用。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01476-3.
2
Evaluation of the impact of the GRACE risk score on the management and outcome of patients hospitalised with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the UK: protocol of the UKGRIS cluster-randomised registry-based trial.评价 GRACE 风险评分对英国非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者管理和结局的影响:英国 GRIS 基于群组随机注册研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 5;9(9):e032165. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032165.
3
Sex Differences in Outcomes After STEMI: Effect Modification by Treatment Strategy and Age.
STEMI 后结局的性别差异:治疗策略和年龄的调节作用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):632-639. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0514.
4
Clinical outcomes according to symptom presentation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results from the FAST-MI 2010 registry.急性心肌梗死患者根据症状表现的临床结局:FAST-MI 2010注册研究结果
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Dec;40(12):1256-1263. doi: 10.1002/clc.22819. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
6
Long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in countries with different socioeconomic environments: an international prospective cohort study.不同社会经济环境国家急性心肌梗死后的长期结局:一项国际前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e012715. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012715.
7
GRACE Score among Six Risk Scoring Systems (CADILLAC, PAMI, TIMI, Dynamic TIMI, Zwolle) Demonstrated the Best Predictive Value for Prediction of Long-Term Mortality in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.在六个风险评分系统(CADILLAC、PAMI、TIMI、动态TIMI、兹沃勒)中,GRACE评分对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期死亡率预测显示出最佳预测价值。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0123215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123215. eCollection 2015.
8
Late Consequences of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Follow-up.急性冠状动脉综合征的晚期后果:全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)随访
Am J Med. 2015 Jul;128(7):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
9
Euro Heart Survey 2009 Snapshot: regional variations in presentation and management of patients with AMI in 47 countries.欧洲心脏调查 2009 快照:47 个国家中 AMI 患者的表现和管理的区域差异。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Dec;2(4):359-70. doi: 10.1177/2048872613497341. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
10
Comparison of three risk stratification rules for predicting patients with acute coronary syndrome presenting to an Australian emergency department.比较三种风险分层规则在预测澳大利亚急诊科就诊的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的应用。
Heart Lung Circ. 2013 Oct;22(10):844-51. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2013.03.074. Epub 2013 May 15.