• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与 PROFILES 注册研究的癌症幸存者比中途退出者的健康相关生活质量更好。

Cancer survivors who fully participate in the PROFILES registry have better health-related quality of life than those who drop out.

机构信息

Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery and UniSA Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00793-7. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11764-019-00793-7
PMID:31493162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6881419/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Attrition and subsequent missing data pose a challenge in longitudinal research in oncology. This study examined factors associated with attrition in the PROFILES registry, and its impact on observed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) estimates.

METHODS

Sociodemographic, clinical, and HRQOL data were collected annually from a cohort of 2625 colorectal cancer survivors between 2010 and 2015. Participant characteristics according to time of dropout were compared using analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Predictors of attrition were examined in logistic regression analysis. Multilevel linear mixed models were constructed to investigate associations between attrition and HRQOL over time.

RESULTS

Participants who dropped out were more likely to be female (OR = 1.23, CI = 1.02-1.47), older (OR = 1.20, CI = 1.09-1.33), less educated (OR = 1.64, CI = 1.30-2.11), and to have depressive symptoms (OR = 1.84, CI = 1.39-2.44) than full responders, and less likely to have high socioeconomic status (OR = 0.74, CI = 0.61-0.94). Participants who dropped out earlier reported significantly worse HRQOL, functioning, and psychosocial symptoms, which declined at a steeper rate over time, than full responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivors' HRQOL may be overestimated in longitudinal research due to attrition of the most unwell participants.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Cancer survivors with the poorest health are at risk of dropping out of PROFILES and possibly withdrawing from other activities. Optimizing participation in PROFILES-a potential mechanism for providing information and access to support-is an avenue for keeping this group engaged.

摘要

目的

在肿瘤学的纵向研究中,流失和随后的数据缺失是一个挑战。本研究旨在探讨 PROFILES 注册研究中流失的相关因素及其对观察到的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)评估的影响。

方法

2010 年至 2015 年间,每年从 2625 名结直肠癌幸存者的队列中收集社会人口统计学、临床和 HRQOL 数据。使用方差分析和卡方检验比较根据退出时间的参与者特征。使用逻辑回归分析检验流失的预测因素。构建多层次线性混合模型,以调查随时间流失与 HRQOL 之间的关联。

结果

与完全应答者相比,退出的参与者更可能是女性(OR=1.23,CI=1.02-1.47)、年龄较大(OR=1.20,CI=1.09-1.33)、受教育程度较低(OR=1.64,CI=1.30-2.11)和抑郁症状(OR=1.84,CI=1.39-2.44),而不太可能具有高社会经济地位(OR=0.74,CI=0.61-0.94)。较早退出的参与者报告的 HRQOL、功能和心理社会症状明显较差,且随时间的推移下降速度更快,而完全应答者则不是。

结论

由于最不适的参与者流失,癌症幸存者的 HRQOL 在纵向研究中可能被高估。

对癌症幸存者的影响

健康状况最差的癌症幸存者有退出 PROFILES 并可能退出其他活动的风险。优化 PROFILES 的参与度-提供信息和获得支持的潜在机制-是让这一群体参与进来的一种途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a9/6881419/89e31cf7080c/11764_2019_793_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a9/6881419/ab0702d1c689/11764_2019_793_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a9/6881419/89e31cf7080c/11764_2019_793_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a9/6881419/ab0702d1c689/11764_2019_793_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a9/6881419/89e31cf7080c/11764_2019_793_Fig2a_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cancer survivors who fully participate in the PROFILES registry have better health-related quality of life than those who drop out.参与 PROFILES 注册研究的癌症幸存者比中途退出者的健康相关生活质量更好。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00793-7. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
2
Cancer survivors not participating in observational patient-reported outcome studies have a lower survival compared to participants: the population-based PROFILES registry.与参与者相比,未参与观察性患者报告结局研究的癌症幸存者的生存率较低:基于人群的 PROFILES 注册研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3313-3324. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1979-0. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
3
Optimistic, realistic, and pessimistic illness perceptions; quality of life; and survival among 2457 cancer survivors: the population-based PROFILES registry.2457 例癌症幸存者的乐观、现实和悲观疾病认知、生活质量和生存情况:基于人群的 PROFILES 注册研究。
Cancer. 2018 Sep 1;124(17):3609-3617. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31634. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
4
Older ovarian cancer survivors report lower long-term health-related quality of life than younger survivors: A study from the population-based profiles registry.老年卵巢癌幸存者报告称,其长期健康相关生活质量低于年轻幸存者:一项基于人群特征登记的研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;153(2):391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
5
Physical activity and health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma survivors: the PROFILES registry.多发性骨髓瘤幸存者的身体活动与健康相关生活质量:PROFILES 登记研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Dec;10(4):e35. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001755. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
Socioeconomic disparities in health-related quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors.结直肠癌幸存者健康相关生活质量的社会经济差异。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Jun;13(3):459-467. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00767-9. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Changes in health-related quality of life among gynecologic cancer survivors during the two years after initial treatment: a longitudinal analysis.初始治疗后两年内妇科癌症幸存者健康相关生活质量的变化:一项纵向分析。
Acta Oncol. 2019 May;58(5):790-800. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1560498. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
8
The impact of psychosocial characteristics in predicting smoking cessation in long-term cancer survivors: A time-to-event analysis.心理社会特征对预测长期癌症幸存者戒烟的影响:一项时事件分析。
Psychooncology. 2018 Oct;27(10):2458-2465. doi: 10.1002/pon.4851. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Evaluating the Impact of Social and Built Environments on Health-Related Quality of Life among Cancer Survivors.评估社会和建筑环境对癌症幸存者健康相关生活质量的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jan;31(1):161-174. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0129. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
10
Heterogeneity in Quality of Life of Long-Term Colon Cancer Survivors: A Latent Class Analysis of the Population-Based PROFILES Registry.长期结肠癌幸存者生活质量的异质性:基于人群的 PROFILES 登记处的潜在类别分析。
Oncologist. 2021 Mar;26(3):e492-e499. doi: 10.1002/onco.13655. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic disparities in health-related quality of life and healthcare use in the last year of life of patients with advanced cancer: longitudinal results from the eQuiPe study.晚期癌症患者生命最后一年中与健康相关的生活质量和医疗保健利用方面的社会经济差异:eQuiPe研究的纵向结果
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 11;33(4):265. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09309-9.
2
Real-world quality-of-life of patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy: EORTC QLQ-C30 results from POLARIS.哌柏西利联合内分泌治疗的 HR+/HER2- 晚期乳腺癌患者的真实世界生活质量:来自 POLARIS 的 EORTC QLQ-C30 结果
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Feb;209(3):613-627. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07524-2. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer survivors not participating in observational patient-reported outcome studies have a lower survival compared to participants: the population-based PROFILES registry.与参与者相比,未参与观察性患者报告结局研究的癌症幸存者的生存率较低:基于人群的 PROFILES 注册研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3313-3324. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1979-0. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
2
Sex Differences in Cancer: Epidemiology, Genetics and Therapy.癌症中的性别差异:流行病学、遗传学与治疗
Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2018 Jul 1;26(4):335-342. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2018.103.
3
Factors Associated With Attrition in a Multicenter Longitudinal Observational Study of Patients With Advanced Cancer.
Development of a prediction model for clinically-relevant fatigue: a multi-cancer approach.临床相关疲劳预测模型的开发:一种多癌症方法。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):231-245. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03807-9. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
4
Health-related quality of life benefits of arsenic trioxide in patients with non-high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia are sustained over time: long-term results of the GIMEMA APL0406 trial.三氧化二砷对非高危急性早幼粒细胞白血病患者健康相关生活质量的益处随时间持续存在:GIMEMA APL0406试验的长期结果
Ann Hematol. 2024 Dec;103(12):5341-5349. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-06038-7. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
5
Impact of comorbidity on health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma: results from the PROFILES-registry.合并症对新诊断淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤患者健康相关生活质量的影响:来自PROFILES注册研究的结果
Ann Hematol. 2024 Dec;103(12):5511-5525. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-06006-1. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Sex differences in health-related quality of life and psychological distress among colorectal cancer patients: a 2-year longitudinal study.结直肠癌患者健康相关生活质量和心理困扰的性别差异:一项为期2年的纵向研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01616-0.
7
Head and neck cancer patients with geriatric deficits are more often non-responders and lost from follow-up in quality of life studies.头颈部癌症合并老年综合征的患者在生活质量研究中更常出现无应答和失访。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 May;281(5):2619-2626. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08528-w. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
8
The course of self-perceived cognitive functioning among patients with lymphoma and the co-occurrence with fatigue and psychological distress.淋巴瘤患者自我感知的认知功能变化过程及其与疲劳和心理困扰的共同发生情况。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb;19(1):183-196. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01458-2. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
9
Sociodemographic, mental health, and physical health factors associated with participation within re-contactable mental health cohorts: an investigation of the GLAD Study.与可再联系的心理健康队列参与相关的社会人口学、心理健康和身体健康因素:GLAD 研究调查。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 26;23(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04890-x.
10
Response rates in clinical quality registries and databases that collect patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review.临床质量登记处和收集患者报告结局测量数据的数据库中的反应率:范围综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jul 11;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02155-5.
与晚期癌症患者多中心纵向观察研究中患者流失相关的因素。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):938-945. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
4
What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?邮寄健康心理学调查中,问卷长度和金钱激励对回复率有何影响?
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):671-685. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12239. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
5
Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates.高保留率的纵向临床研究中的受试者保留措施。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z.
6
Factors associated with non-participation and dropout among cancer patients in a cluster-randomised controlled trial.一项整群随机对照试验中癌症患者不参与及退出的相关因素。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Jan;27(1). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12645. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
7
Ovarian cancer study dropouts had worse health-related quality of life and psychosocial symptoms at baseline and over time.卵巢癌研究的退出者在基线时以及随着时间推移,其与健康相关的生活质量和心理社会症状更差。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;13(5):e381-e388. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12580. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
8
Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: Progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities.2016 年非裔美国人癌症统计数据:减少种族差异方面的进展和机会。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):290-308. doi: 10.3322/caac.21340. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
9
Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust.高阶模型的复制与验证表明,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)的综合得分是可靠的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
10
Do we reach the patients with the most problems? Baseline data from the WebCan study among survivors of head-and-neck cancer, Denmark.我们是否接触到了问题最多的患者?来自丹麦头颈部癌症幸存者网络研究的基线数据。
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Apr;10(2):251-60. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0471-x. Epub 2015 Jul 31.