Suppr超能文献

意大利关于西妥昔单抗联合治疗老年转移性结直肠癌患者的调查。

Italian survey on cetuximab-based therapy of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

机构信息

U.O. Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Carlo, Potenza, Italy.

U.O. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale "San Giovanni di Dio", ASL NA 2 NORD, Frattamaggiore, Italy.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;84(5):1089-1096. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03943-x. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on the use of cetuximab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. To this end, a survey was carried in 17 Italian oncology centers.

METHODS

The centers answered a 29-item questionnaire structured as follows: (i) demographic characteristics; (ii) medical history; (iii) assessment of RAS/BRAF mutations and DPD/UGT polymorphism before treatment; (iv) treatment schemes and side effects; (v) geriatric assessment and customization of treatment.

RESULTS

One-third of patients are over 80 years old. The RAS/BRAF mutational status is not primarily evaluated by 17.6% of the centers, while DPD and UGT polymorphism is not evaluated by 82.4% and 76.5% of the centers. The most common therapeutic scheme is cetuximab/FOLFIRI and diarrhea is the main cause of suspension/reduction of treatment. The 70% of centers use systemic tetracyclines for skin toxicity. The 23.5% of the centers do not carry out any geriatric evaluation before the start of the therapy and those who perform it prefer the G8 (70.6%) and VES-13 (29.4%) scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater efforts should be made to improve the evaluation of the patient both about mutational and genetic procedures with geriatric evaluation. As for cetuximab in elderly patients, randomized studies are needed to provide guidance to physicians.

摘要

目的

对于转移性结直肠癌的老年患者,使用西妥昔单抗尚无共识。为此,在意大利的 17 个肿瘤中心进行了一项调查。

方法

各中心回答了一份由 29 个项目组成的问卷,内容如下:(一)人口统计学特征;(二)病史;(三)治疗前 RAS/BRAF 突变和 DPD/UGT 多态性评估;(四)治疗方案和副作用;(五)老年评估和治疗定制。

结果

三分之一的患者年龄在 80 岁以上。17.6%的中心没有对 RAS/BRAF 突变状态进行初步评估,82.4%和 76.5%的中心没有对 DPD 和 UGT 多态性进行评估。最常见的治疗方案是西妥昔单抗/FOLFIRI,腹泻是停止/减少治疗的主要原因。70%的中心使用系统四环素治疗皮肤毒性。23.5%的中心在开始治疗前不进行任何老年评估,而那些进行评估的中心更喜欢使用 G8(70.6%)和 VES-13(29.4%)量表。

结论

应加大努力,改善对患者的评估,包括突变和遗传程序以及老年评估。对于老年患者使用西妥昔单抗,需要进行随机研究为医生提供指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验