• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺闪烁显像中利伐沙班与华法林治疗急性肺栓塞患者残留灌注缺损的发生率比较。

Incidence of residual perfusion defects by lung scintigraphy in patients treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for acute pulmonary embolism.

机构信息

Haematology Department, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health, Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.

Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Feb;49(2):220-227. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01944-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11239-019-01944-4
PMID:31493288
Abstract

Residual perfusion defects (RPD) as detected by lung scintigraphy occur in over 50% of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) treated with vitamin K antagonists but there is lack of data in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. The aim of this retrospective study was to estimate the incidence of RPD detected by ventilation perfusion (VQ) scan at 3-6 months in patients with first acute symptomatic PE treated with rivaroxaban compared to warfarin. Consecutive eligible patients treated with rivaroxaban as part of a previous study were identified. The Monash Health Radiology database was used to identify a historical cohort of age matched (± 5 years) patients treated with warfarin. Follow-up VQ scans were classified as normal (no perfusion defect) or abnormal (matched or unmatched perfusion defects) by two independent nuclear medicine physicians blinded to treatment. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus. One hundred and ninety patients with PE (95 in each cohort) were included (mean age 56.8 years; 41.1% males; 54.2% unprovoked). In the overall cohort, 31.1% had RPD with a significantly lower incidence of RPD in rivaroxaban treated patients 23.2% (95% CI 15.8-32.6), compared to warfarin 38.9% (95% CI 29.8-49.0). Treatment with rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly lower incidence of RPD detected by VQ scan at 3-6 months compared to warfarin. This supports recent in-vitro data suggesting an indirect enhancement of fibrinolysis by direct oral Xa inhibitors but requires confirmation in larger studies.

摘要

肺闪烁显像检测到的残余灌注缺损(RPD)在接受维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗的急性肺栓塞(PE)患者中超过 50%,但在接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的患者中缺乏数据。本回顾性研究的目的是评估与华法林相比,接受利伐沙班治疗的首次急性有症状 PE 患者在 3-6 个月时通气灌注(VQ)扫描检测到 RPD 的发生率。确定了之前研究中接受利伐沙班治疗的符合条件的连续患者。使用 Monash Health 放射学数据库来确定年龄匹配(±5 岁)的接受华法林治疗的历史队列患者。由两名独立的核医学医师进行盲法评估,根据 VQ 扫描将随访结果分为正常(无灌注缺损)或异常(匹配或不匹配的灌注缺损)。任何分歧均通过共识解决。共纳入 190 例 PE 患者(每组 95 例;平均年龄 56.8 岁;41.1%为男性;54.2%为无诱因)。在总体队列中,31.1%的患者有 RPD,利伐沙班组 RPD 的发生率明显较低(95%CI 15.8-32.6),而华法林组为 38.9%(95%CI 29.8-49.0)。与华法林相比,利伐沙班治疗与 3-6 个月时 VQ 扫描检测到的 RPD 发生率明显降低相关。这支持最近的体外数据表明直接口服 Xa 抑制剂间接增强纤溶,但需要在更大的研究中证实。

相似文献

1
Incidence of residual perfusion defects by lung scintigraphy in patients treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for acute pulmonary embolism.肺闪烁显像中利伐沙班与华法林治疗急性肺栓塞患者残留灌注缺损的发生率比较。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Feb;49(2):220-227. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01944-4.
2
Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a propensity-matched nationwide cohort study.利伐沙班与华法林在非诱因性静脉血栓栓塞症患者中的有效性和安全性:一项倾向匹配的全国性队列研究。
Lancet Haematol. 2017 May;4(5):e237-e244. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30054-6. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
3
Rivaroxaban versus Heparin Bridging to Warfarin Therapy: Impact on Hospital Length of Stay and Treatment Costs for Low-Risk Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.利伐沙班与肝素桥接华法林治疗:对低风险肺栓塞患者住院时间和治疗费用的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10):1109-1115. doi: 10.1002/phar.1828. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
4
Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with a non-sex-related CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1.利伐沙班与华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动伴非性别相关 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分为 1 分患者中的有效性和安全性。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):64-69. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy025.
5
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与华法林相比治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725.
6
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动虚弱患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e008643. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008643.
7
Healthcare costs associated with rivaroxaban or warfarin use for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.与使用利伐沙班或华法林治疗静脉血栓栓塞相关的医疗费用。
J Med Econ. 2017 Feb;20(2):200-203. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1243544. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
8
Low persistence to rivaroxaban or warfarin among patients with new venous thromboembolism at a safety net academic medical center.在一家安全网学术医疗中心,新诊断静脉血栓栓塞症患者对利伐沙班或华法林的持续低用药率。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Feb;49(2):287-293. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01959-x.
9
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.非瓣膜性心房颤动且既往有卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中应用阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2142-2149. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017474. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for Stroke Prevention and Venous Thromboembolism Treatment in Extreme Obesity and High Body Weight.利伐沙班与华法林在极度肥胖和高体重人群中的卒中预防和静脉血栓栓塞症治疗中的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Apr;54(4):344-350. doi: 10.1177/1060028019886092. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Utility of a Nurse-Led Pathway for Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism Discharged on Rivaroxaban: A Prospective Cohort Study.利伐沙班出院的急性静脉血栓栓塞症患者的护士主导管理路径的实用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2019 Mar;45(2):187-195. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676320. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
2
Rivaroxaban and apixaban induce clotting factor Xa fibrinolytic activity.利伐沙班和阿哌沙班诱导凝血因子 Xa 的纤维蛋白溶解活性。
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Nov;16(11):2276-2288. doi: 10.1111/jth.14281. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
3
Residual pulmonary embolism as a predictor for recurrence after a first unprovoked episode: Results from the REVERSE cohort study.
首次无诱因事件后复发的预测因子:来自 REVERSE 队列研究的结果。
Thromb Res. 2018 Feb;162:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.11.020. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
Impact of residual pulmonary obstruction on the long-term outcome of patients with pulmonary embolism.肺栓塞患者残留肺阻塞对长期预后的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2017 May 25;49(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01980-2016. Print 2017 May.
5
Recanalization rate in patients with proximal vein thrombosis treated with the direct oral anticoagulants.直接口服抗凝剂治疗的近端静脉血栓患者再通率。
Thromb Res. 2017 May;153:97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
6
Residual pulmonary vascular obstruction and recurrence after acute pulmonary embolism. A single center cohort study.急性肺栓塞后残留肺血管阻塞及复发:一项单中心队列研究。
Thromb Res. 2016 Dec;148:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
7
Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of ISTH.将患者分类为有诱因或无诱因静脉血栓栓塞:国际血栓与止血学会科学标准化委员会的指南
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jul;14(7):1480-3. doi: 10.1111/jth.13336. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
8
Current concepts in the pathogenesis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压发病机制的当前概念
Pulm Circ. 2016 Jun;6(2):145-54. doi: 10.1086/686011.
9
Dabigatran but not rivaroxaban or apixaban treatment decreases fibrinolytic resistance in patients with atrial fibrillation.达比加群而非利伐沙班或阿哌沙班治疗可降低房颤患者的纤溶抵抗。
Thromb Res. 2016 Feb;138:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.12.023. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
10
Determinants of oral anticoagulation control in new warfarin patients: analysis using data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink.新华法林患者口服抗凝控制的决定因素:来自临床实践研究数据库的数据分析。
Thromb Res. 2015 Aug;136(2):250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 9.