• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生的决策模式与家属在场情况:日本的横断面在线调查研究

Physician Decision-Making Patterns and Family Presence: Cross-Sectional Online Survey Study in Japan.

作者信息

Tsuda Kenji, Higuchi Asaka, Yokoyama Emi, Kosugi Kazuhiro, Komatsu Tsunehiko, Kami Masahiro, Tanimoto Tetsuya

机构信息

Medical Governance Research Institute, Minatoku, Japan.

Graduate School of Education, Seisa University, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2019 Sep 6;8(3):e12781. doi: 10.2196/12781.

DOI:10.2196/12781
PMID:31493327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6764328/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to a low birth rate and an aging population, Japan faces an increase in the number of elderly people without children living in single households. These elderly without a spouse and/or children encounter a lack of caregivers because most sources of care for the elderly in Japan are not provided by private agencies but by family members. However, family caregivers not only help with daily living but are also key participants in treatment decision making. The effect of family absence on treatment decision making has not been elucidated, although more elderly people will not have family members to make surrogate decisions on their behalf.

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to understand the influence of family absence on treatment decision making by physicians through a cross-sectional online survey with three hypothetical vignettes of patients.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among Japanese physicians using three hypothetical vignettes. The first vignette was about a 65-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and the second was about a 78-year-old woman with dementia, both of whom developed pneumonia with consciousness disturbance. The third vignette was about a 70-year-old woman with necrosis of her lower limb. Participants were randomly assigned to either of the two versions of the questionnaires-with family or without family-but methods were identical otherwise. Participants chose yes or no responses to questions about whether they would perform the presented medical procedures.

RESULTS

Among 1112 physicians, 454 (40.8%) completed the survey; there were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between groups. Significantly fewer physicians had a willingness to perform dialysis (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.80; P=.002) and artificial ventilation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.75; P<.001) for a patient from vignette 1 without family. In vignette 2, fewer physicians were willing to perform artificial ventilation (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.90; P=.02). In vignette 3, significantly fewer physicians showed willingness to perform wound treatment (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.84; P=.007), surgery (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22-0.57; P<.001), blood transfusion (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.66; P<.001), vasopressor (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.72; P<.001), dialysis (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24-0.59; P<.001), artificial ventilation (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15-0.40; P<.001), and chest compression (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18-0.47; P<.001) for a patient without family.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients may have treatments withheld because of the absence of family, highlighting the potential importance of advance care planning in the era of an aging society with a declining birth rate.

摘要

背景

由于出生率低和人口老龄化,日本面临着独居无子女老年人数量的增加。这些无配偶和/或子女的老年人缺乏照料者,因为在日本,大多数老年人的照料并非由私人机构提供,而是由家庭成员提供。然而,家庭照料者不仅协助日常生活,还是治疗决策的关键参与者。尽管越来越多的老年人将没有家庭成员代表他们做出替代决策,但家庭缺失对治疗决策的影响尚未阐明。

目的

旨在通过一项包含三个患者假设案例的横断面在线调查,了解家庭缺失对医生治疗决策的影响。

方法

我们使用三个假设案例对日本医生进行了横断面在线调查。第一个案例是关于一名65岁患有酒精性肝硬化的男性,第二个案例是关于一名78岁患有痴呆症的女性,两人均因肺炎出现意识障碍。第三个案例是关于一名70岁下肢坏死的女性。参与者被随机分配到问卷的两个版本之一——有家庭或无家庭——但其他方法相同。参与者对关于是否会实施所呈现医疗程序的问题选择“是”或“否”的回答。

结果

在1112名医生中,454名(40.8%)完成了调查;两组之间的基线特征无显著差异。对于案例1中无家庭的患者,愿意进行透析的医生明显更少(优势比[OR]0.55,95%置信区间0.34 - 0.80;P = 0.002)以及进行人工通气的医生明显更少(OR 0.51,95%置信区间0.35 - 0.75;P < 0.001)。在案例2中,愿意进行人工通气的医生更少(OR 0.59,95%置信区间0.39 - 0.90;P = 0.其二,2)。在案例3中,对于无家庭的患者,愿意进行伤口治疗的医生明显更少(OR 0.51,95%置信区间0.31 - 0.84;P = 0.007)、进行手术的医生明显更少(OR 0.35,95%置信区间0.22 - 0.57;P < 0.001)、进行输血的医生明显更少(OR 0.45,95%置信区间0.31 - 0.66;P < 0.001)、使用血管加压药的医生明显更少(OR 0.49,95%置信区间0.34 - 以下是原文剩余部分的翻译:

72;P < 0.001)、进行透析的医生明显更少(OR 0.38,95%置信区间0.24 - 0.59;P < 0.001)、进行人工通气的医生明显更少(OR 0.25,95%置信区间0.15 - 0.40;P < 0.001)以及进行胸外按压的医生明显更少(OR 0.29其二,95%置信区间0.18 - 0.47;P < 0.001)。

结论

老年患者可能因家庭缺失而得不到治疗,这凸显了在出生率下降的老龄化社会中,预先护理计划的潜在重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb4e/6764328/5bb3998db8f7/ijmr_v8i3e12781_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb4e/6764328/5bb3998db8f7/ijmr_v8i3e12781_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb4e/6764328/5bb3998db8f7/ijmr_v8i3e12781_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Physician Decision-Making Patterns and Family Presence: Cross-Sectional Online Survey Study in Japan.医生的决策模式与家属在场情况:日本的横断面在线调查研究
Interact J Med Res. 2019 Sep 6;8(3):e12781. doi: 10.2196/12781.
2
Junior medical doctors' decision making when using advance care directives to guide treatment for people with dementia: a cross-sectional vignette study.初级医生在使用预先指示指导痴呆患者治疗时的决策:一项横断面病例研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jul 14;23(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00811-x.
3
Family dynamics in a multi-ethnic Asian society: comparison of elderly CKD patients and their family caregivers experience with medical decision making for managing end stage kidney disease.多民族亚洲社会中的家庭动态:老年慢性肾脏病患者及其家庭照顾者在管理终末期肾病的医疗决策方面的经验比较。
BMC Nephrol. 2019 Mar 1;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1259-4.
4
Absence of Relatives Impairs the Approach of Nurses to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Non-Cancer Elderly Patients without a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Order: A Vignette-Based Questionnaire Study.亲属不在场会影响护士对非癌症老年患者进行心肺复苏的态度,这些患者没有下达拒绝复苏医嘱:基于情景的问卷调查研究。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020 Jan;250(1):71-78. doi: 10.1620/tjem.250.71.
5
The Influence of Surrogate Decision Makers on Clinical Decision Making for Critically Ill Adults.替代决策者对危重症成年患者临床决策的影响
J Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jul;30(5):278-85. doi: 10.1177/0885066613516597. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Understanding Physician's Perspectives on AI in Health Care: Protocol for a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Vignette Study.了解医生对医疗保健中人工智能的看法:一项序贯多重赋值随机 vignette 研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 4;13:e54787. doi: 10.2196/54787.
7
Impact of advance directives and a health care proxy on doctors' decisions: a randomized trial.预先指示和医疗保健代理人对医生决策的影响:一项随机试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jan;47(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
8
Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States.伦理决策与患者自主权:日本和美国医生与患者的比较
Chest. 2000 Oct;118(4):1172-82. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1172.
9
Association between Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate Status and Resident Physician Decision-making. A National Survey.“不要复苏/不要插管”状态与住院医师决策之间的关联。一项全国性调查。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Apr;14(4):536-542. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-798OC.
10
Patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in Japan.日本患者对参与治疗决策的偏好。
BMC Fam Pract. 2004 Mar 1;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-5-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Patients' Views on Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy: A Questionnaire-Based Survey.癌症患者对超分割放疗的看法:一项基于问卷调查的研究
Cureus. 2024 Oct 22;16(10):e72093. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72093. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Patients' and caregivers' experiences of hospitalization under COVID-19 visitation restrictions.COVID-19 探视限制下患者和照护者的住院体验。
J Hosp Med. 2022 Oct;17(10):819-826. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12924. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
Implications for the design of a Diagnostic Decision Support System (DDSS) to reduce time and cost to diagnosis in paediatric shoulder instability.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex differences in surrogate decision-maker preferences for life-sustaining treatments of Japanese patients with heart failure.心力衰竭日本患者生命维持治疗中代理决策者偏好的性别差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):1165-1172. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12352. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
2
Effect of Recruitment Methods on Response Rate in a Web-Based Study for Primary Care Physicians: Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial.招募方法对基层医疗医生网络研究中应答率的影响:析因随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 8;20(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8561.
3
Japanese physicians' experiences of terminally ill patients voluntarily stopping eating and drinking: a national survey.
对设计一个诊断决策支持系统 (DDSS) 以减少儿科肩不稳定症诊断时间和成本的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Feb 27;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01446-5.
日本医生对绝症患者自愿停止进食和饮水的经历:一项全国性调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Jun;9(2):143-145. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001426. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
The TRIO Framework: Conceptual insights into family caregiver involvement and influence throughout cancer treatment decision-making.TRIO 框架:对癌症治疗决策过程中家庭照顾者参与和影响的概念性洞察。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Nov;100(11):2035-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 5.
5
Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians.男性与女性医生治疗的医疗保险患者的医院死亡率和再入院率比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):206-213. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875.
6
Medical decision-making for older adults without family.老年人无家属时的医疗决策。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Nov;60(11):2144-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04212.x. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
7
Life support for patients without a surrogate decision maker: who decides?没有替代决策者的患者的生命支持:由谁来决定?
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 3;147(1):34-40. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00006.
8
Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.针对既无决策能力又无替代决策者的重症患者做出的限制维持生命治疗的决定。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2053-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227654.38708.C1.
9
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.医学期刊上发表的邮寄调查的回复率。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;50(10):1129-36. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1.
10
Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.加拿大医护人员对重症患者停止生命支持决策的影响因素。加拿大重症监护试验组。
JAMA. 1995 Mar 1;273(9):703-8.