Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Valladolid, Dr. Mergelina, s/n, 47011, Valladolid, Spain; Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Valladolid, Campus Miguel Delibes, Paseo de Belén 7, 47011, Valladolid, Spain; Institute of Sustainable Processes (IPS), University of Valladolid, Dr. Mergelina s/n, 47011, Valladolid, Spain.
Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Valladolid, Dr. Mergelina, s/n, 47011, Valladolid, Spain; Institute of Sustainable Processes (IPS), University of Valladolid, Dr. Mergelina s/n, 47011, Valladolid, Spain.
Anal Chim Acta. 2019 Nov 20;1083:19-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.06.044. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Several analytical approaches have been developed for the determination of emerging pollutants (EPs), including pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in environmental matrices. This paper reviews the sample preparation and instrumental methods proposed in the last few years (2012-2018) to assess PPCPs in sewage sludge. Three main steps are examined: extraction, clean-up and analysis. Sample preparation is critical as target compounds are normally found at low concentrations in complex matrices. Most procedures include sewage sludge pretreatment mostly through ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) although other novel techniques such as QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe) or MSPD (matrix solid-phase dispersion) have been also employed. In one report, no differences in extraction efficiency were detected among the most commonly used extraction techniques such as ultrasound, microwave and pressurized liquid. Clean-up usually involves a conventional method such as solid phase extraction (SPE). This step is needed to appreciably reduce matrix suppression, and is followed by an instrumental analysis using techniques of preference such as gas chromatography (GC) or liquid chromatography (LC), mostly coupled to mass spectrometry (MS). A fully automated on-line system that includes extraction, chromatographic separation, and mass spectrometry in one-stage is here presented as a novel way of determining PPCPs in sewage sludge. This review also discusses the advantages and limitations of the different techniques used. Miniaturizing analytical techniques and the use of novel solid and liquid phase materials are emerging as efficient options that fulfill the principles of so-called "green chemistry".
已开发出几种分析方法来测定环境基质中的新兴污染物(EPs),包括药品和个人护理产品(PPCPs)。本文综述了过去几年(2012-2018 年)提出的用于评估污水污泥中 PPCPs 的样品制备和仪器方法。考察了三个主要步骤:提取、净化和分析。由于目标化合物通常在复杂基质中浓度较低,因此样品制备至关重要。大多数程序都包括污水污泥预处理,主要通过超声辅助提取(UAE)进行,尽管其他新技术如 QuEChERS(快速、简单、廉价、有效、坚固和安全)或 MSPD(基质固相分散)也已被采用。在一份报告中,没有检测到最常用的提取技术(如超声、微波和加压液体)之间在提取效率方面存在差异。净化通常涉及固相萃取(SPE)等常规方法。这一步骤是为了显著减少基质抑制,然后使用气相色谱(GC)或液相色谱(LC)等首选技术进行仪器分析,通常与质谱(MS)联用。本文介绍了一种将提取、色谱分离和质谱在一个阶段集成的全自动在线系统,作为一种用于测定污水污泥中 PPCPs 的新方法。本文还讨论了不同技术的优缺点。微型化分析技术和新型固液相材料的应用正在成为满足所谓“绿色化学”原则的有效选择。