• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沿海和海洋生态系统服务的捐赠方评估。

Donor-side evaluation of coastal and marine ecosystem services.

机构信息

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China; Beijing Engineering Research Center for Watershed Environmental Restoration & Integrated Ecological Regulation, Beijing, 100875, China.

出版信息

Water Res. 2019 Dec 1;166:115028. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115028. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2019.115028
PMID:31494489
Abstract

There is an increasing need for coastal and marine ecosystems conservation. However, information to guide management decisions for coastal and marine ecosystems is still lacking. Considering the present advantages and limitations of existing ecosystem services valuation (ESV) accounting methods, this paper proposes a detailed donor-side accounting approach, based on emergy method, which could be used as the basis for better policies-making on coastal and marine conservation. In particular, this includes a classification of different ecosystems, a system for ecosystem services (ES) classification, ES formation mechanism, as well as accounting techniques. The ES classification system includes direct, indirect and existence services. Accounting techniques presented here can overcome common limitations in existing accounting methods: (1) double counting; (2) evaluation from the receiver perspective; (3) the inappropriate use and replacement of unit emergy value (UEV). The present method is applied to the evaluation of coastal and marine ecosystems in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), China. Results show that (1) the total coastal ESV decreased from 2000 to 2009 in the PRD area, among which water purification contributes most to the decrease, followed by soil building, climate regulation and microclimate regulation; (2) the coastal ecosystems have the largest potential to regulate climate whether at micro or macro scale; (3) the marine ESV decreased with the ratio of 42.37%, and biomass increase and carbon sequestration account for the decrease; (4) intertidal marshes has the largest ESV per unit area, followed by mangrove, coral reefs and rocky marine shores, while the marine ecosystem has the smallest ESV per unit area. As proved by the case study, this work can provide a basis for an accounting method for coastal and marine ESV assessment, which could serve to improve both the management decision making processes and policy indications through accurately valuing coastal and marine ES, leading to additional investment in conservation of these ecosystems.

摘要

沿海和海洋生态系统的保护需求日益增长。然而,用于指导沿海和海洋生态系统管理决策的信息仍然缺乏。考虑到现有生态系统服务价值(ESV)评估方法的现有优势和局限性,本文提出了一种详细的基于能值方法的捐赠方核算方法,该方法可以作为制定更好的沿海和海洋保护政策的基础。特别是,该方法包括不同生态系统的分类、生态系统服务分类系统、生态系统服务形成机制以及核算技术。该生态系统服务分类系统包括直接、间接和存在服务。本文提出的核算技术可以克服现有核算方法的常见局限性:(1)重复计算;(2)从接受方的角度进行评估;(3)不当使用和替代单位能值(UEV)。该方法应用于中国珠江三角洲(PRD)沿海和海洋生态系统的评估。结果表明:(1)PRD 地区的沿海生态系统服务总价值从 2000 年到 2009 年减少,其中水净化对减少的贡献最大,其次是土壤形成、气候调节和小气候调节;(2)沿海生态系统在微观和宏观尺度上都具有最大的气候调节潜力;(3)海洋生态系统服务价值减少了 42.37%,生物量增加和碳固存导致了减少;(4)潮间带湿地单位面积的生态系统服务价值最大,其次是红树林、珊瑚礁和岩石海岸,而海洋生态系统的单位面积生态系统服务价值最小。案例研究证明,这项工作可以为沿海和海洋生态系统服务价值评估提供核算方法的基础,通过准确评估沿海和海洋生态系统服务价值,可以改善管理决策过程和政策指示,从而为保护这些生态系统提供更多投资。

相似文献

1
Donor-side evaluation of coastal and marine ecosystem services.沿海和海洋生态系统服务的捐赠方评估。
Water Res. 2019 Dec 1;166:115028. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115028. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
2
[Non-monetary accounting on forest ecosystem services value: Case study of forests in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region].[森林生态系统服务价值的非货币核算:以京津冀地区森林为例]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Nov;29(11):3747-3759. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201811.019.
3
Emergy-based evaluation of world coastal ecosystem services.基于能值分析的世界沿海生态系统服务评估。
Water Res. 2021 Oct 1;204:117656. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117656. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
4
First high-resolution marine natural capital mapping in the coastal waters of Chinese mainland.首次对中国大陆近岸海域进行高分辨率海洋自然资本测绘。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jan 1;349:119596. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119596. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
Marine Socio-Environmental Covariates: queryable global layers of environmental and anthropogenic variables for marine ecosystem studies.海洋社会环境协变量:可查询的全球海洋生态系统研究环境和人为变量图层。
Ecology. 2017 Jul;98(7):1976. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1884. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
6
Spatial cost-benefit analysis of blue restoration and factors driving net benefits globally.蓝藻水华治理的空间成本效益分析及全球净效益驱动因素。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Dec;35(6):1850-1860. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13742. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
7
Is economic valuation of ecosystem services useful to decision-makers? Lessons learned from Australian coastal and marine management.生态系统服务的经济估值对决策者有用吗?从澳大利亚沿海和海洋管理中吸取的经验教训。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Aug 1;178:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
8
Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: a useful way to manage and conserve marine resources?重视生物多样性和生态系统服务:这是管理和保护海洋资源的有效方式吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Dec 14;283(1844). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1635.
9
Government conservation policies on Mexican coastal areas: is "top-down" management working?墨西哥沿海地区的政府保护政策:“自上而下”的管理有效吗?
Rev Biol Trop. 2011 Dec;59(4):1487-501. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v59i4.3414.
10
Kenya.肯尼亚。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2001 Dec;42(12):1264-78. doi: 10.1016/s0025-326x(01)00241-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Global Systematic Literature Review of Ecosystem Services in Reef Environments.全球珊瑚礁环境生态系统服务的系统文献综述
Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;73(3):634-645. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01912-y. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
2
Hidden challenges behind ecosystem services improvement claims.生态系统服务改善宣称背后的隐藏挑战。
iScience. 2022 Aug 13;25(9):104928. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104928. eCollection 2022 Sep 16.