Division of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Br J Nutr. 2019 Sep 28;122(6):605-615. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519001454. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
Dietary fibre is believed to provide important health benefits including protection from colorectal cancer. However, the evidence on the relationships with different dietary fibre sources is mixed and little is known about which fibre source provides the greatest benefits. We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohorts to summarise the relationships of different fibre sources with colorectal cancer and adenoma risks. Analyses were restricted to publications that reported all fibre sources (cereals, vegetables, fruits, legumes) to increase comparability between results. PubMed and Embase were searched through August 2018 to identify relevant studies. The summary relative risks (RR) and 95 % CI were estimated using a random-effects model. This analysis included a total of ten prospective studies. The summary RR of colorectal cancer associated with each 10 g/d increase in fibre intake were 0·91 (95 % CI 0·82, 1·00; I2 = 0 %) for cereal fibre, 0·95 (95 % CI 0·87, 1·03, I2 = 0 %) for vegetable fibre, 0·91 (95 % CI 0·78, 1·06, I2 = 43 %) for fruit fibre and 0·84 (95 % CI 0·63, 1·13, I2 = 45 %) for legume fibre. For cereal fibre, the association with colorectal cancer risk remained statistically significant after adjustment for folate intake (RR 0·89, 95 % CI 0·80, 0·99, I2 = 2 %). For vegetable and fruit fibres, the dose-response curve suggested evidence of non-linearity. All fibre sources were inversely associated with incident adenoma (per 10 g/d increase: RR 0·81 (95 % CI 0·54, 1·21) cereals, 0·84 (95 % CI 0·71, 0·98) for vegetables, 0·78 (95 % CI 0·65, 0·93) for fruits) but not associated with recurrent adenoma. Our data suggest that, although all fibre sources may provide some benefits, the evidence for colorectal cancer prevention is strongest for fibre from cereals/grains.
膳食纤维被认为对健康有重要的益处,包括预防结直肠癌。然而,关于不同膳食纤维来源与结直肠癌和腺瘤风险之间关系的证据存在差异,并且对于哪种膳食纤维来源提供最大益处知之甚少。我们进行了一项前瞻性队列的剂量反应荟萃分析,以总结不同膳食纤维来源与结直肠癌和腺瘤风险的关系。分析仅限于报告所有膳食纤维来源(谷物、蔬菜、水果、豆类)的出版物,以增加结果之间的可比性。通过 2018 年 8 月的 PubMed 和 Embase 检索来确定相关研究。使用随机效应模型估计汇总相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间。这项分析共纳入了 10 项前瞻性研究。与膳食纤维摄入量每增加 10 g/d 相关的结直肠癌汇总 RR 分别为谷物纤维 0.91(95%CI 0.82,1.00;I2=0%)、蔬菜纤维 0.95(95%CI 0.87,1.03,I2=0%)、水果纤维 0.91(95%CI 0.78,1.06,I2=43%)和豆类纤维 0.84(95%CI 0.63,1.13,I2=45%)。对于谷物纤维,在调整叶酸摄入量后,与结直肠癌风险的关联仍然具有统计学意义(RR 0.89,95%CI 0.80,0.99,I2=2%)。对于蔬菜和水果纤维,剂量反应曲线表明存在非线性关系。所有膳食纤维来源与腺瘤发病风险呈负相关(每增加 10 g/d:RR 0.81(95%CI 0.54,1.21)谷类,0.84(95%CI 0.71,0.98)蔬菜,0.78(95%CI 0.65,0.93)水果),但与复发性腺瘤无关。我们的数据表明,尽管所有膳食纤维来源都可能提供一些益处,但预防结直肠癌的证据最强的是来自谷物/谷物的纤维。