• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人使用者和非使用者对反大麻信息感知效果的研究:对大麻对认知表现、驾驶和健康影响的信息的反应研究。

Perceived Effectiveness of Anti-Marijuana Messages in Adult Users and Nonusers: An Examination of Responses to Messages About Marijuana's Effects on Cognitive Performance, Driving, and Health.

机构信息

Oklahoma Tobacco Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2019 Jul;80(4):415-422. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.415.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2019.80.415
PMID:31495378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6739640/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Marijuana use is associated with negative cognitive and health outcomes and risky driving. Given the rapidly changing policies regarding legal recreational and medicinal marijuana use, it is important to examine what types of marijuana prevention messages may be effective in minimizing such outcomes. This study examined cognitive and affective responses to anti-marijuana public health messages in a sample of adult marijuana users and nonusers to determine the correlates of perceived message effectiveness.

METHOD

Participants (N = 203; mean age = 37.7 years) were adult marijuana users and nonusers recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (August 2017). After completing self-report measures of marijuana use, they viewed six anti-marijuana messages presented in a random order, addressing marijuana's effects in each of three topic areas: cognitive performance, driving, and adverse health outcomes (e.g., two messages per topic). Participants completed assessments of cognitive and affective perceptions after viewing each message. For each message topic, a linear regression model was used to determine which cognitive and affective perceptions were most predictive of perceived message effectiveness.

RESULTS

For all message topics, nonusers perceived the messages as more effective than did users (p < .001). In the majority of analyses, greater message effectiveness was associated with increased perceived harm of marijuana and increased liking of the message. For driving and health messages, greater message effectiveness was also significantly correlated with lower pleasant affect.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that audience perceptions may be uniquely predictive of message effectiveness, depending on the topic.

摘要

目的

大麻使用与认知和健康不良后果以及危险驾驶有关。鉴于娱乐和药用大麻使用的政策迅速变化,重要的是要研究哪些类型的大麻预防信息可能有助于最小化这些后果。本研究在一组成年大麻使用者和非使用者中检查了反大麻公共卫生信息的认知和情感反应,以确定感知信息有效性的相关因素。

方法

参与者(N = 203;平均年龄为 37.7 岁)是通过亚马逊 Mechanical Turk(2017 年 8 月)招募的成年大麻使用者和非使用者。在完成大麻使用的自我报告措施后,他们以随机顺序观看了六个反大麻信息,分别针对三个主题领域的大麻影响:认知表现、驾驶和不良健康后果(例如,每个主题有两条信息)。参与者在观看每条消息后完成对认知和情感感知的评估。对于每个消息主题,使用线性回归模型确定哪些认知和情感感知对感知消息有效性的预测性最强。

结果

对于所有消息主题,非使用者都认为这些消息比使用者更有效(p <.001)。在大多数分析中,更大的消息有效性与大麻的感知危害增加和对消息的喜爱增加有关。对于驾驶和健康信息,消息的有效性也与较低的愉快度显著相关。

结论

研究结果表明,取决于主题,受众的看法可能是消息有效性的独特预测因素。

相似文献

1
Perceived Effectiveness of Anti-Marijuana Messages in Adult Users and Nonusers: An Examination of Responses to Messages About Marijuana's Effects on Cognitive Performance, Driving, and Health.成人使用者和非使用者对反大麻信息感知效果的研究:对大麻对认知表现、驾驶和健康影响的信息的反应研究。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2019 Jul;80(4):415-422. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.415.
2
How marijuana use status affects responses to anti-marijuana messages.大麻使用状况如何影响对反大麻信息的反应。
Cannabis. 2021 Oct 1;4(2):1-16. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2021.02.001. Epub 2021 May 19.
3
Cognitive and affective responses to marijuana prevention and educational messaging.对大麻预防和教育信息的认知和情感反应。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Aug 1;225:108788. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108788. Epub 2021 May 28.
4
Cannabis Users' and Non-Users' Differential Responses to Two Anti-Cannabis Campaigns.大麻使用者和非使用者对两项反大麻运动的不同反应。
Health Educ Behav. 2025 Feb;52(1):49-60. doi: 10.1177/10901981241267879. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
5
Perceptions of driving after marijuana use compared to alcohol use among rural American young adults.美国农村青年对大麻使用后驾车和酒精使用后驾车的认知比较。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jul;37(5):637-644. doi: 10.1111/dar.12686. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Individual differences in drivers' cognitive processing of road safety messages.驾驶员对道路安全信息认知处理的个体差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 May 18.
7
Operating a motor vehicle after marijuana use: Perspectives from people who use high-potency marijuana.吸食大麻后驾驶机动车辆:吸食高浓度大麻人群的观点。
Subst Abus. 2018 Jan 2;39(1):21-26. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1365802. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
8
Primary versus secondary prevention messages: College students' perceptions of effectiveness by marijuana user status.原发性预防与继发性预防信息:基于大麻使用者身份,大学生对其有效性的认知。
J Am Coll Health. 2019 Nov-Dec;67(8):743-752. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1506790. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
Insights into targeting young male drivers with anti-speeding advertising: An application of the Step approach to Message Design and Testing (SatMDT).针对年轻男性驾驶员的超速驾驶广告投放洞察:“信息设计与测试分步方法”(SatMDT)的应用
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jun;103:129-142. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
Effects of chronic marijuana use on driving performance.长期使用大麻对驾驶性能的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):680-686. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1501800. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
In harm's way: Do college students' beliefs about cannabis put them at risk for use?处于危险之中:大学生对大麻的信念会使他们面临使用风险吗?
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Nov;72(8):2588-2596. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2119404. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
2
Cognitive and affective responses to marijuana prevention and educational messaging.对大麻预防和教育信息的认知和情感反应。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Aug 1;225:108788. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108788. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
The importance of psychology for shaping legal cannabis regulation.心理学对于塑造合法大麻监管的重要性。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Feb;29(1):99-115. doi: 10.1037/pha0000362. Epub 2020 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the Tips From Former Smokers Campaign on Population-Level Smoking Cessation, 2012-2015.《2012-2015 年“前吸烟者倡议”对人群戒烟的影响》。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 May 31;15:E71. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180051.
2
Crowdsourced data collection for public health: A comparison with nationally representative, population tobacco use data.众包数据收集在公共卫生中的应用:与全国代表性、人口烟草使用数据的比较。
Prev Med. 2017 Sep;102:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
3
Association Between The Real Cost Media Campaign and Smoking Initiation Among Youths - United States, 2014-2016.2014 - 2016年美国真实成本媒体宣传活动与青少年吸烟行为的关联
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jan 20;66(2):47-50. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6602a2.
4
National Estimates of Marijuana Use and Related Indicators - National Survey on Drug Use and Health, United States, 2002-2014.全国大麻使用及相关指标估计数——美国 2002-2014 年药物使用与健康全国性调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Sep 2;65(11):1-28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6511a1.
5
Evaluation of the National Tips From Former Smokers Campaign: the 2014 Longitudinal Cohort.对“前吸烟者的国家提示”运动的评估:2014年纵向队列研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Mar 24;13:E42. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150556.
6
Graphic Warning Labels Elicit Affective and Thoughtful Responses from Smokers: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.图形警示标签引发吸烟者的情感和深思反应:一项随机临床试验的结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0142879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142879. eCollection 2015.
7
Are mass-media campaigns effective in preventing drug use? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.大众媒体宣传活动在预防药物使用方面是否有效?一项Cochrane系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 3;5(9):e007449. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007449.
8
Gender differences in the associations among marijuana use, cigarette use, and symptoms of depression during adolescence and young adulthood.青少年和青年期大麻使用、香烟使用与抑郁症状之间关联的性别差异。
Addict Behav. 2015 Oct;49:33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 24.
9
Associations of cannabis and cigarette use with depression and anxiety at age 18: findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.18岁时大麻和香烟使用与抑郁及焦虑的关联:来自雅芳亲子纵向研究的发现
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0122896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122896. eCollection 2015.
10
An epidemiologic review of marijuana and cancer: an update.大麻与癌症的流行病学综述:最新进展
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jan;24(1):15-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1026.