• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议中的神经心理学标准,使 MCI 恢复正常。

MCI-to-normal reversion using neuropsychological criteria in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.

San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego (SDSU/UCSD) Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Oct;15(10):1322-1332. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.4948. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.4948
PMID:31495605
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6801026/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The low mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to cognitively normal (CN) reversion rate in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (2-3%) suggests the need to examine reversion by other means. We applied comprehensive neuropsychological criteria (NP criteria) to determine the resulting MCI to CN reversion rate.

METHODS

Participants with CN (n = 641) or MCI (n = 569) were classified at baseline and year 1 using NP criteria. Demographic, neuropsychological, and Alzheimer's disease biomarker variables as well as progression to dementia were examined across stable CN, reversion, and stable MCI groups.

RESULTS

NP criteria produced a one-year reversion rate of 15.8%. Reverters had demographics, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, and risk-of-progression most similar to the stable CN group and showed the most improvement on neuropsychological measures from baseline to year 1.

DISCUSSION

NP criteria produced a reversion rate that is consistent with, albeit modestly improved from, reversion rates in meta-analyses. Reverters' biomarker profiles and progression rates suggest that NP criteria accurately tracked with underlying pathophysiologic status.

摘要

简介

阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative,ADNI)中轻度认知障碍(mild cognitive impairment,MCI)向认知正常(cognitively normal,CN)的低逆转率(2-3%)表明需要通过其他方法来检查逆转情况。我们应用综合神经心理学标准(neuropsychological criteria,NP 标准)来确定由此产生的 MCI 向 CN 的逆转率。

方法

使用 NP 标准对基线时为 CN(n=641)或 MCI(n=569)的参与者进行分类,并在第 1 年进行分类。对稳定 CN、逆转和稳定 MCI 组的人口统计学、神经心理学、阿尔茨海默病生物标志物变量以及向痴呆的进展进行了检查。

结果

NP 标准产生的一年逆转率为 15.8%。逆转者的人口统计学、阿尔茨海默病生物标志物和进展风险与稳定 CN 组最相似,并且在从基线到第 1 年的神经心理学测量中表现出最大的改善。

讨论

NP 标准产生的逆转率与荟萃分析中的逆转率一致,尽管略有改善。逆转者的生物标志物特征和进展率表明,NP 标准准确地反映了潜在的病理生理状态。

相似文献

1
MCI-to-normal reversion using neuropsychological criteria in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.使用阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议中的神经心理学标准,使 MCI 恢复正常。
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Oct;15(10):1322-1332. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.4948. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Artificially low mild cognitive impairment to normal reversion rate in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议中人为的轻度认知障碍低至正常逆转率。
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Apr;15(4):561-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.10.008. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
3
Neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment improves diagnostic precision, biomarker associations, and progression rates.轻度认知障碍的神经心理学标准提高了诊断准确性、生物标志物关联性和进展率。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42(1):275-89. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140276.
4
Is there an MCI reversion to cognitively normal? Analysis of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers profiles.是否存在从轻度认知障碍(MCI)向认知正常的逆转?对阿尔茨海默病生物标志物谱的分析。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Mar;27(3):429-37. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002129. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
5
The Transition of Mild Cognitive Impairment Over Time: An AV45- and FDG-PET Study of Reversion and Conversion Phenomena.随时间推移的轻度认知障碍的转变:AV45 和 FDG-PET 研究中的逆转和转化现象。
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2021;18(9):721-731. doi: 10.2174/1567205018666211124110710.
6
Cognitive and morphometric features of mild cognitive impairment reversion in early patients with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病早期患者轻度认知障碍恢复的认知和形态计量学特征。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2024 Oct;127:107077. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107077. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
7
Factors predicting reversion from mild cognitive impairment to normal cognitive functioning: a population-based study.预测从轻度认知障碍向正常认知功能转变的因素:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059649. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
8
Clinical and demographic predictors of mild cognitive impairment for converting to Alzheimer's disease and reverting to normal cognition.轻度认知障碍转化为阿尔茨海默病及恢复正常认知的临床和人口统计学预测因素。
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Nov 15;346(1-2):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
Neuropsychological Equivalence of the Clinical Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心统一数据集中轻度认知障碍临床诊断的神经心理学等效性与阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2021;50(3):231-236. doi: 10.1159/000516413. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
Does mild cognitive impairment always lead to dementia? A review.轻度认知障碍是否总会导致痴呆?一篇综述。
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Oct 15;369:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.07.055. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced cognitive performance in older adults through combined cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation.通过联合认知训练和经颅直流电刺激提高老年人的认知能力。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 6;15(1):24114. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08322-6.
2
Characterizing bidirectional transitions in mild cognitive impairment and post-reversion based on longitudinal neuroimaging and cognitive assessments.基于纵向神经影像学和认知评估对轻度认知障碍及恢复后的双向转变进行特征描述。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 May;21(5):e70263. doi: 10.1002/alz.70263.
3
Dissecting the clinical and pathological prognosis of MCI patients who reverted to normal cognition: a longitudinal study.剖析认知恢复正常的轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的临床和病理预后:一项纵向研究。
BMC Med. 2025 May 6;23(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04092-0.
4
Association of Favorable Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers With Reversion of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Parkinson's Disease.脑脊液有利标志物与帕金森病所致轻度认知障碍逆转的关联
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Spring;37(2):131-136. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240099. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
5
Longitudinal Patterns and Predictors of Cognitive Impairment Classification Stability.认知障碍分类稳定性的纵向模式及预测因素
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 May 21;40(4):802-813. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae107.
6
Self- and study partner-reported cognitive decline in older adults without dementia: The role of α-synuclein and amyloid biomarkers in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.老年人中无痴呆症患者的自我和学习伙伴报告的认知能力下降:阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议中α-突触核蛋白和淀粉样蛋白生物标志物的作用。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Nov;20(11):7777-7787. doi: 10.1002/alz.14239. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
7
Polygenic Score for Conscientiousness Is a Protective Factor for Reversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Normal Cognition.尽责性多基因评分是从轻度认知障碍恢复为正常认知的保护因素。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Aug;11(29):e2309889. doi: 10.1002/advs.202309889. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
8
Cognition and Amyloid-β in Older Veterans: Characterization and Longitudinal Outcomes of Data-Derived Phenotypes.老年退伍军人的认知与β-淀粉样蛋白:数据衍生表型的特征及纵向结果
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;99(1):417-427. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240077.
9
Cognitive, Emotional, and Daily Functioning Domains Involved in Decision-Making among Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.轻度认知障碍患者决策过程中涉及的认知、情感和日常功能领域:一项系统综述
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 14;14(3):278. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030278.
10
Interaction between Aβ and tau on reversion and conversion in mild cognitive impairment patients: After 2-year follow-up.轻度认知障碍患者中β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)与tau蛋白在逆转和转化方面的相互作用:2年随访后
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 21;10(5):e26839. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26839. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificially low mild cognitive impairment to normal reversion rate in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议中人为的轻度认知障碍低至正常逆转率。
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Apr;15(4):561-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.10.008. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
2
Increasing Inaccuracy of Self-Reported Subjective Cognitive Complaints Over 24 Months in Empirically Derived Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment.主观认知主诉的自我报告在经验衍生的轻度认知障碍亚型中 24 个月的准确性逐渐降低。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Sep;24(8):842-853. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000486.
3
Unmasking the benefits of donepezil via psychometrically precise identification of mild cognitive impairment: A secondary analysis of the ADCS vitamin E and donepezil in MCI study.通过心理测量学精确识别轻度认知障碍揭示多奈哌齐的益处:ADCS维生素E和多奈哌齐治疗轻度认知障碍研究的二次分析
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017 Dec 1;4:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.11.001. eCollection 2018.
4
Statistically Derived Subtypes and Associations with Cerebrospinal Fluid and Genetic Biomarkers in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Latent Profile Analysis.轻度认知障碍中基于统计得出的亚型及其与脑脊液和基因生物标志物的关联:一项潜在类别分析
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Aug;23(7):564-576. doi: 10.1017/S135561771700039X. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
5
Effects of MCI subtype and reversion on progression to dementia in a community sample.社区样本中轻度认知障碍亚型及逆转对痴呆进展的影响。
Neurology. 2017 Jun 6;88(23):2225-2232. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004015. Epub 2017 May 10.
6
Longitudinal Trajectories of Informant-Reported Daily Functioning in Empirically Defined Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment.经验性定义的轻度认知障碍亚型中由 informant 报告的日常功能的纵向轨迹。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Jul;23(6):521-527. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717000285. Epub 2017 May 10.
7
Predictors of Reversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Normal Cognition.从轻度认知障碍恢复到正常认知的预测因素
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;43(3-4):204-214. doi: 10.1159/000456070. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Heterogeneous cortical atrophy patterns in MCI not captured by conventional diagnostic criteria.轻度认知障碍中异质性皮质萎缩模式未被传统诊断标准所捕捉。
Neurology. 2016 Nov 15;87(20):2108-2116. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003326. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
9
Does mild cognitive impairment always lead to dementia? A review.轻度认知障碍是否总会导致痴呆?一篇综述。
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Oct 15;369:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.07.055. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
Spontaneous Reversion of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Normal Cognition: A Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis.轻度认知障碍自发恢复至正常认知:文献系统综述与荟萃分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Oct 1;17(10):943-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Aug 5.