Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7013, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10360-10368. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16470. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
The problem of nonadherence to advice is recognized in several professional relationships, including the veterinarian-client relationship. A better understanding of farmer perspectives may help to improve efficiency in veterinary herd health management. This study aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively describe farmers' reasons for adherence and nonadherence with veterinary recommendations regarding preventive herd health measures. We carried out structured telephone interviews about implementation of preventive measures with owners or staff of 163 dairy farms and 6 beef farms. The farms had received an advisory visit by their veterinarian (n = 36), who had documented the preventive measures they had recommended. The interviewer noted verbatim responses to reasons for implementing preventive measures fully, partially, or not at all, and we analyzed these responses thematically. We also conducted a quantitative analysis, in which we calculated descriptive statistics of the proportions of different categories of reasons stated by the farmers. Altogether, 726 preventive measures (range per farm 1 to 17; median 3; interquartile range 2 to 6) were documented. We identified 3 organizing themes related to adherence or nonadherence with veterinary advice: trust, feasibility, and priorities. Overall, the most commonly stated reasons related to trust (in the veterinarian, in the advisory process, or in individual preventive measures). The most common reasons not to follow the recommended advice were related to feasibility. Based on the results, we recommend that, to improve adherence to their advice, veterinarians pay increased attention to farmers' needs, priorities, goals, and motives, as well as to farmers' perceptions of the effectiveness of individual preventive measures. We also recommend that veterinarians need to increase their focus on recommending preventive measures that are practically feasible to implement on farms.
在包括兽医-客户关系在内的几种专业关系中,都存在不遵守建议的问题。更好地了解农民的观点可能有助于提高兽医群体健康管理的效率。本研究旨在定性和定量描述农民对兽医关于预防群体健康措施的建议的遵守和不遵守的原因。我们对 163 家奶牛场和 6 家肉牛场的所有者或工作人员进行了有关实施预防措施的结构电话访谈。这些农场接受了兽医的咨询访问(n=36),兽医记录了他们推荐的预防措施。采访者逐字记录了对完全、部分或根本不实施预防措施的原因的回应,我们对这些回应进行了主题分析。我们还进行了定量分析,计算了农民提出的不同类别的原因的比例的描述性统计数据。总共记录了 726 项预防措施(每个农场的范围为 1 至 17;中位数为 3;四分位距为 2 至 6)。我们确定了与遵守或不遵守兽医建议相关的 3 个组织主题:信任、可行性和优先级。总体而言,最常提到的与信任(对兽医、咨询过程或个别预防措施的信任)相关的原因。不遵守建议的最常见原因与可行性有关。根据研究结果,我们建议兽医在提高对建议的遵守率时,应更加关注农民的需求、优先级、目标和动机,以及农民对个别预防措施有效性的看法。我们还建议兽医需要更加关注推荐在农场实际可行的预防措施。