Suppr超能文献

肉类、牛奶和蛋类中膳食DNA、蛋白质及草甘膦的检测。

Detection of dietary DNA, protein, and glyphosate in meat, milk, and eggs.

作者信息

Van Eenennaam A L, Young A E

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2017 Jul;95(7):3247-3269. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1346.

Abstract

Products such as meat, milk, and eggs from animals that have consumed genetically engineered (GE) feed are not currently subject to mandatory GE labeling requirements. Some voluntary "non-genetically modified organism" labeling has been associated with such products, indicating that the animals were not fed GE crops, as there are no commercialized GE food animals. This review summarizes the available scientific literature on the detection of dietary DNA and protein in animal products and briefly discusses the implications of mandatory GE labeling for products from animals that have consumed GE feed. Because glyphosate is used on some GE crops, the available studies on glyphosate residues in animal products are also reviewed. In GE crops, recombinant DNA (rDNA) makes up a small percentage of the plant's total DNA. The final amount of DNA in food/feed depends on many factors including the variable number and density of cells in the edible parts, the DNA-containing matrix, environmental conditions, and the specific transgenic event. Processing treatments and animals' digestive systems degrade DNA into small fragments. Available reports conclude that endogenous DNA and rDNA are processed in exactly the same way in the gastrointestinal tract and that they account for a very small proportion of food intake by weight. Small pieces of high copy number endogenous plant genes have occasionally been detected in meat and milk. Similarly sized pieces of rDNA have also been identified in meat, primarily fish, although detection is inconsistent. Dietary rDNA fragments have not been detected in chicken or quail eggs or in fresh milk from cows or goats. Collectively, studies have failed to identify full-length endogenous or rDNA transcripts or recombinant proteins in meat, milk, or eggs. Similarly, because mammals do not bioaccumulate glyphosate and it is rapidly excreted, negligible levels of glyphosate in cattle, pig and poultry meat, milk, and eggs have been reported. Despite consumer concern about the presence of trace concentrations of glyphosate that might have been applied to feed crops and/or the presence of rDNA or recombinant proteins in meat, milk, and eggs, the available data do not provide evidence to suggest that products from animals that have consumed approved GE feed crops differ in any distinguishable way from those derived from animals fed conventional feed or that products from animals fed GE feedstuffs pose novel health risks.

摘要

来自动物的肉类、奶类和蛋类等产品,若其食用了转基因饲料,目前并不需要遵循强制性的转基因标签要求。一些自愿性的“非转基因生物”标签已与这类产品相关联,这表明这些动物没有被喂食转基因作物,因为目前还没有商业化的转基因食用动物。本综述总结了关于动物产品中膳食DNA和蛋白质检测的现有科学文献,并简要讨论了对食用转基因饲料的动物产品进行强制性转基因标签标注的影响。由于草甘膦被用于一些转基因作物,因此也对动物产品中草甘膦残留的现有研究进行了综述。在转基因作物中,重组DNA(rDNA)在植物总DNA中所占比例很小。食品/饲料中DNA的最终含量取决于许多因素,包括可食用部分细胞数量和密度的变化、含DNA的基质、环境条件以及特定的转基因事件。加工处理和动物的消化系统会将DNA降解成小片段。现有报告得出结论,内源性DNA和rDNA在胃肠道中的处理方式完全相同,而且它们在食物摄入量中所占的重量比例非常小。在肉类和奶类中偶尔会检测到少量高拷贝数的内源性植物基因片段。在肉类中,主要是鱼类,也发现了大小相似的rDNA片段,不过检测结果并不一致。在鸡肉或鹌鹑蛋以及来自奶牛或山羊的新鲜牛奶中未检测到膳食rDNA片段。总体而言,研究未能在肉类、奶类或蛋类中鉴定出全长的内源性或rDNA转录本或重组蛋白。同样,由于哺乳动物不会生物累积草甘膦且草甘膦会迅速排泄,因此报告显示牛、猪和家禽的肉、奶和蛋中草甘膦含量可忽略不计。尽管消费者担心可能施用于饲料作物的痕量草甘膦的存在,以及肉类、奶类和蛋类中rDNA或重组蛋白的存在,但现有数据并未提供证据表明食用经批准的转基因饲料作物的动物所产产品与食用传统饲料的动物所产产品有任何可区分的差异,也没有表明食用转基因饲料的动物所产产品会带来新的健康风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验