Suppr超能文献

医疗机构如何在老年痴呆症住院护理的背景下解读相关规定。

How provider organisations interpret regulation in the context of residential dementia aged care.

作者信息

Biggs Simon, Carr Ashley

机构信息

School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

The Brotherhood of Saint Laurence, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38 Suppl 2:83-89. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12634.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore how Australian residential dementia aged care providers respond to regulation via organisational culture, level, processes and interpretation.

METHODS

Observation took place in three provider organisations. Qualitative, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with aged care staff (n = 60) at three different levels of each organisation: senior management from three head offices (n = 17), facility management (n = 13) and personal care workers (n = 30) from eight residential care facilities.

RESULTS

Orientations towards regulation included the following: "above and beyond;" "pushing back;" and "engineering out." Regulation was interpreted differently depending on the level of authority within an organisation where boundaries were managed according to strategic, operational and interactional priorities.

DISCUSSION

Examining regulation within an organisational context and at different staff levels suggests ways to balance dementia care with regulatory control. Both generate stress, mitigated by culture and interdependent role differentiation.

摘要

目的

探讨澳大利亚老年痴呆症住院护理服务提供者如何通过组织文化、层级、流程及解读来应对监管。

方法

对三个服务提供机构进行了观察。对每个机构三个不同层级的老年护理人员(n = 60)进行了定性的、半结构化的深度访谈:来自三个总部的高级管理人员(n = 17)、机构管理人员(n = 13)以及来自八个住院护理机构的个人护理员(n = 30)。

结果

对监管的态度包括以下几种:“超越要求”;“抵制”;以及“排除”。根据组织内的权力层级不同,监管的解读也有所不同,在组织内,边界是根据战略、运营和互动优先级来管理的。

讨论

在组织背景和不同员工层级审视监管,提出了平衡痴呆症护理与监管控制的方法。两者都会产生压力,而文化和相互依存的角色分化可缓解这种压力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验