• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你所说的与我想要的:痴呆症公共卫生宣传及倡议的优先事项。

What you say and what I want: Priorities for public health campaigning and initiatives in relation to dementia.

作者信息

Haapala Irja, Carr Ashley, Biggs Simon

机构信息

School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.

出版信息

Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38 Suppl 2:59-67. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12647.

DOI:10.1111/ajag.12647
PMID:31496066
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the overlap between priorities expressed by representatives from national and local campaigning organisations and the views of key voices in relation to dementia.

METHODS

Semi-structured, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with 19 representatives from campaigning organisations, including nine countries and six local community initiatives in Australia. Responses were categorised into nine priorities. Views were compared to the voices of people with dementia (n = 19), carers (n = 28), and health-care (n = 21), social work (n = 23) and service professionals (n = 20).

RESULTS

Local groups prioritised user-led decision-making and community normalising agendas. National groups were influenced by service frameworks and increasing public awareness. Professional and carer groups focused on increasing understanding and communication skills while people with dementia valued being a normal part of society.

CONCLUSION

Future campaigning should use both national and local approaches to changing social relations, through interpersonal connections, advocacy and social mobilisation, to promote a normalising approach to attitude change.

摘要

目的

探讨国家和地方竞选组织代表所表达的优先事项与痴呆症相关关键人士观点之间的重叠情况。

方法

对来自竞选组织的19名代表进行了半结构化深度电话访谈,其中包括澳大利亚的9个国家组织和6个地方社区倡议组织。回答被归类为9个优先事项。将这些观点与痴呆症患者(n = 19)、护理人员(n = 28)、医疗保健人员(n = 21)、社会工作者(n = 23)和服务专业人员(n = 20)的观点进行了比较。

结果

地方团体将用户主导的决策和社区常态化议程列为优先事项。国家团体受到服务框架和提高公众意识的影响。专业人员和护理人员团体专注于增进理解和沟通技巧,而痴呆症患者重视成为社会的正常组成部分。

结论

未来的竞选活动应采用国家和地方两种方法来改变社会关系,通过人际关系、宣传和社会动员,以促进态度改变的常态化方法。

相似文献

1
What you say and what I want: Priorities for public health campaigning and initiatives in relation to dementia.你所说的与我想要的:痴呆症公共卫生宣传及倡议的优先事项。
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38 Suppl 2:59-67. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12647.
2
Differences in priority by age group and perspective: implications for public health education and campaigning in relation to dementia.按年龄组和视角存在的优先事项差异:对与痴呆症相关的公共卫生教育和宣传活动的影响。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Nov;30(11):1583-1591. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000935. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
3
Partnering with people with dementia and their care partners, aged care service experts, policymakers and academics: A co-design process.与痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴、老年护理服务专家、政策制定者和学者合作:一个共同设计的过程。
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38 Suppl 2:53-58. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12635.
4
Relationships in consumer-directed care: An integrative literature review.消费者导向型护理中的关系:一项综合文献综述。
Australas J Ageing. 2017 Sep;36(3):193-204. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12444. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
5
How provider organisations interpret regulation in the context of residential dementia aged care.医疗机构如何在老年痴呆症住院护理的背景下解读相关规定。
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38 Suppl 2:83-89. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12634.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the access to and use of formal dementia care: findings of a focus group study with people with dementia, informal carers and health and social care professionals in eight European countries.获取和使用正式痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素:在 8 个欧洲国家进行的一项焦点小组研究,涉及痴呆症患者、非正式照顾者以及卫生和社会保健专业人员的发现。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0816-1.
7
Patient safety in community dementia services: what can we learn from the experiences of caregivers and healthcare professionals?社区痴呆症服务中的患者安全:我们可以从护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的经验中学到什么?
Age Ageing. 2017 May 1;46(3):518-521. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw220.
8
Dementia care planning: shared experience and collaboration.痴呆症护理规划:共享经验与协作
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2009 Nov;52(8):837-48. doi: 10.1080/01634370903088051.
9
Desired characteristics and outcomes of community care services for persons with dementia: what is important according to clients, service providers and policy?痴呆症患者社区护理服务的期望特征和成果:根据客户、服务提供者和政策,什么是重要的?
Australas J Ageing. 2013 Jun;32(2):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2012.00625.x. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
10
The facilitators of communication with people with dementia in a care setting: an interview study with healthcare workers.护理机构中与痴呆症患者沟通的促进因素:一项对医护人员的访谈研究
Age Ageing. 2016 Jan;45(1):164-70. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv161.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder perceptions of dementia in Colombia: a qualitative study.哥伦比亚利益相关者对痴呆症的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22166-9.
2
Collaboration for Developing and Sustaining Community Dementia-Friendly Initiatives: A Realist Evaluation.发展和维持社区痴呆友好倡议的合作:一个现实主义评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):4006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054006.
3
How do community based dementia friendly initiatives work for people with dementia and their caregivers, and why? A rapid realist review.
基于社区的痴呆症友好倡议如何为痴呆症患者及其照护者服务,原因是什么?快速现实主义综述。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;37(2). doi: 10.1002/gps.5662. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
4
Organising care, practice and participative research: Papers from the cognitive decline partnership centre.组织护理、实践与参与性研究:认知衰退合作中心论文集
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):3-5. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12679.