• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A novel predictor of clinical progression in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer.一种用于接受前列腺癌主动监测患者临床进展的新型预测指标。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Aug;13(8):250-255. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6122. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
2
Validating the total cancer location density metric for stratifying patients with low-risk localized prostate cancer at higher risk of grade group reclassification while on active surveillance.验证总癌症位置密度指标,用于在积极监测期间对低风险局限性前列腺癌患者进行分层,这些患者有更高的分级组重新分类风险。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Mar;41(3):146.e23-146.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.003. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
3
Cumulative Cancer Locations is a Novel Metric for Predicting Active Surveillance Outcomes: A Multicenter Study.累积癌症部位是预测主动监测结果的新指标:一项多中心研究。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Sep;1(4):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度预测初始前列腺活检和前列腺切除术中 Gleason 评分升级的能力随着肿瘤分级的增加而降低,这是由于单位肿瘤体积的 PSA 分泌减少所致。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
5
A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.对于接受前列腺癌主动监测的男性,阴性确认性活检并不能保护他们免于组织学分级进展。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.038. Epub 2013 May 2.
6
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.在真实队列中对前列腺癌进行主动监测:比较 PRIAS 合格和 PRIAS 不合格患者的结局。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Aug;1(3):231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
Obesity is associated with risk of progression for low-risk prostate cancers managed expectantly.肥胖与低危前列腺癌期待管理下的进展风险相关。
Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):841-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
8
Predictors of pathologic progression on biopsy among men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: the value of the pattern of surveillance biopsies.在对局限性前列腺癌进行主动监测的男性中,活检出现病理性进展的预测因素:监测活检模式的价值。
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.060. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
9
Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance?在适合进行主动监测的患者中,前列腺活检中的累积前列腺癌长度(CCL)能否改善对根治性前列腺切除术中临床意义不显著癌症的预测?
BJU Int. 2015 Aug;116(2):220-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12880. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
Eleven-year management of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: what have we learned?前列腺癌患者11年的主动监测管理:我们学到了什么?
Tumori. 2017 Sep 18;103(5):464-474. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000649. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel approach to engineering three-dimensional bladder tumor models for drug testing.一种用于药物测试的三维膀胱肿瘤模型工程的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):26883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78440-0.
2
Determining Clinically Based Factors Associated With Reclassification in the Pre-MRI Era using a Large Prospective Active Surveillance Cohort.使用大型前瞻性主动监测队列确定 MRI 前与重新分类相关的临床相关因素。
Urology. 2020 Apr;138:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.041. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Cumulative Cancer Locations is a Novel Metric for Predicting Active Surveillance Outcomes: A Multicenter Study.累积癌症部位是预测主动监测结果的新指标:一项多中心研究。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Sep;1(4):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 May 15.
2
Health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance versus radical prostatectomy, external-beam radiotherapy, prostate brachytherapy and reference population: a cross-sectional study.接受主动监测与根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、前列腺近距离放疗以及参照人群的前列腺癌男性患者的健康相关生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jan 14;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1082-4.
3
Predicting Gleason Group Progression for Men on Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Role of a Negative Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.预测接受前列腺癌主动监测男性的 Gleason 分组进展:阴性确认性磁共振成像-超声融合活检的作用。
J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.051.
4
Validation of the Decipher Test for predicting adverse pathology in candidates for prostate cancer active surveillance.验证 Decipher 检测在预测前列腺癌主动监测候选者不良病理方面的性能。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Sep;22(3):399-405. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0101-6. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
5
Contemporary Active Surveillance: Candidate Selection, Follow-up Tools, and Expected Outcomes.当代主动监测:候选者选择、随访工具及预期结果
Urol Clin North Am. 2017 Nov;44(4):565-574. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.005.
6
Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Identification, Management, and Outcomes.低危前列腺癌:识别、管理与结局。
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):238-249. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
7
Factors predicting prostate cancer upgrading on magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in an active surveillance population.主动监测人群中磁共振成像靶向活检时前列腺癌病理升级的预测因素
Cancer. 2017 Jun 1;123(11):1941-1948. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30548. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
8
Stricter Active Surveillance Criteria for Prostate Cancer do Not Result in Significantly Better Outcomes: A Comparison of Contemporary Protocols.更严格的前列腺癌主动监测标准并未带来显著更好的结果:对当代方案的比较。
J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1645-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.083. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Current status of active surveillance in prostate cancer.前列腺癌主动监测的现状
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jan;57(1):14-20. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.1.14. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
10
Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value.前列腺癌主动监测中的系列磁共振成像:增量价值
J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1421-1427. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.055. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

一种用于接受前列腺癌主动监测患者临床进展的新型预测指标。

A novel predictor of clinical progression in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

作者信息

Tan Guan Hee, Finelli Antonio, Ahmad Ardalan, Wettstein Marian S, Chandrasekar Thenappan, Zlotta Alexandre R, Fleshner Neil E, Hamilton Robert J, Kulkarni Girish S, Ajib Khaled, Nason Gregory, Perlis Nathan

机构信息

Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Aug;13(8):250-255. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6122. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.6122
PMID:31496491
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6737740/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Active surveillance (AS) is standard of care in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). This study describes a novel total cancer location (TCLo) density metric and aims to determine its performance in predicting clinical progression (CP) and grade progression (GP).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients on AS after confirmatory biopsy (CBx). We excluded patients with Gleason ≥7 at CBx and <2 years followup. TCLo was the number of locations with positive cores at diagnosis (DBx) and CBx. TCLo density was TCLo/prostate volume (PV). CP was progression to any active treatment while GP occurred if Gleason ≥7 was identified on repeat biopsy or surgical pathology. Independent predictors of time to CP or GP were estimated with Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared progression-free survival (PFS) curves between TCLo density groups. Test characteristics of TCLo density were explored with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

We included 181 patients who had CBx from 2012-2015 and met inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 62.58 years (standard deviation [SD] 7.13) and median followup was 60.9 months (interquartile range [IQR] 23.4). A high TCLo density score (>0.05) was independently associated with time to CP (hazard ratio [HR] 4.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-8.42; p<0.001) and GP (HR 3.85; 95% CI 1.91-7.73; p<0.001). ROC curves showed TCLo density has greater area under the curve than number of positive cores at CBx in predicting progression.

CONCLUSIONS

TCLo density is able to stratify patients on AS for risk of CP and GP. With further validation, it could be added to the decision-making algorithm in AS for low-risk localized PCa.

摘要

引言

主动监测(AS)是低风险前列腺癌(PCa)的标准治疗方法。本研究描述了一种新的全癌灶位置(TCLo)密度指标,旨在确定其在预测临床进展(CP)和分级进展(GP)方面的表现。

方法

这是一项对确诊活检(CBx)后接受AS治疗的患者的回顾性研究。我们排除了CBx时Gleason评分≥7以及随访时间<2年的患者。TCLo是诊断活检(DBx)和CBx时阳性核心灶的位置数量。TCLo密度为TCLo/前列腺体积(PV)。CP是进展至任何积极治疗,而如果在重复活检或手术病理中发现Gleason评分≥7,则发生GP。使用Cox回归估计CP或GP发生时间的独立预测因素。Kaplan-Meier分析比较了TCLo密度组之间的无进展生存期(PFS)曲线。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线探索TCLo密度的检验特征。

结果

我们纳入了2012年至2015年期间进行CBx且符合纳入标准的181例患者。患者的平均年龄为62.58岁(标准差[SD]7.13),中位随访时间为60.9个月(四分位间距[IQR]23.4)。高TCLo密度评分(>0.05)与CP发生时间(风险比[HR]4.70;95%置信区间[CI]2.62-8.42;p<0.001)和GP(HR 3.85;95%CI 1.91-7.73;p<0.001)独立相关。ROC曲线显示,在预测进展方面,TCLo密度的曲线下面积大于CBx时阳性核心灶的数量。

结论

TCLo密度能够对接受AS治疗的患者进行CP和GP风险分层。经过进一步验证后,它可被添加到低风险局限性PCa的AS决策算法中。