• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌患者11年的主动监测管理:我们学到了什么?

Eleven-year management of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: what have we learned?

作者信息

Marenghi Cristina, Alvisi Maria Francesca, Palorini Federica, Avuzzi Barbara, Badenchini Fabio, Bedini Nice, Bellardita Lara, Biasoni Davide, Bosetti Davide, Casale Alessandra, Catanzaro Mario, Colecchia Maurizio, De Luca Letizia, Donegani Simona, Dordoni Paola, Lanocita Rodolfo, Maffezzini Massimo, Magnani Tiziana, Menichetti Julia, Messina Antonella, Morlino Sara, Paolini Biagio, Rancati Tiziana, Stagni Silvia, Tesone Antonio, Torelli Tullio, Tulli Baldoin Edoardo, Vaiani Marta, Villa Sergio, Villa Silvia, Zaffaroni Nadia, Nicolai Nicola, Salvioni Roberto, Valdagni Riccardo

机构信息

Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan - Italy.

Division of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan - Italy.

出版信息

Tumori. 2017 Sep 18;103(5):464-474. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000649. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

DOI:10.5301/tj.5000649
PMID:28623636
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6379800/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of active surveillance (AS) on patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and to identify predictors of disease reclassification.

METHODS

In 2005, we defined an institutional AS protocol (Sorveglianza Attiva Istituto Nazionale Tumori [SAINT]), and we joined the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study in 2007. Eligibility criteria included clinical stage ≤T2a, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 ng/mL, and Gleason Pattern Score (GPS) ≤3 + 3 (both protocols); ≤25% positive cores with a maximum core length containing cancer ≤50% (SAINT); and ≤2 positive cores and PSA density <0.2 ng/mL/cm3 (PRIAS). Switching to active treatment was advised for a worsening of GPS, increased positive cores, or PSA doubling time <3 years. Active treatment-free survival (ATFS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with ATFS were evaluated with a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 818 patients were included: 200 in SAINT, 530 in PRIAS, and 88 in personalized AS monitoring. Active treatment-free survival was 50% after a median follow-up of 60 months. A total of 404/818 patients (49.4%) discontinued AS: 274 for biopsy-related reclassification, 121/404 (30%) for off-protocol reasons, 9/404 (2.2%) because of anxiety. Biopsy reclassification was associated with PSA density (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8), maximum percentage of core involvement (HR 1.5), positive cores at diagnostic biopsy (HR 1.6), older age (HR 1.5), and prostate volume (HR 0.6) (all p<0.01). Patients from SAINT were significantly more likely to discontinue AS than were the patients from PRIAS (HR 1.65, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Five years after diagnosis, 50% of patients with early PCa were spared from active treatment. Wide inclusion criteria are associated with lower ATFS. However, at preliminary analysis, this does not seem to affect the probability of unfavorable pathology.

摘要

目的

评估主动监测(AS)对低风险前列腺癌(PCa)患者的疗效,并确定疾病重新分类的预测因素。

方法

2005年,我们制定了一项机构性AS方案(国立肿瘤研究所主动监测[SAINT]),并于2007年加入了国际前列腺癌研究:主动监测(PRIAS)研究。纳入标准包括临床分期≤T2a、初始前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)<10 ng/mL以及Gleason模式评分(GPS)≤3+3(两项方案);阳性核心≤25%,含癌的最大核心长度≤50%(SAINT);以及阳性核心≤2个且PSA密度<0.2 ng/mL/cm³(PRIAS)。若GPS恶化、阳性核心增加或PSA倍增时间<3年,则建议转为积极治疗。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估无积极治疗生存期(ATFS)。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估与ATFS相关的因素。

结果

共纳入818例患者:SAINT组200例,PRIAS组530例,个性化AS监测组88例。中位随访60个月后,无积极治疗生存期为50%。共有404/818例患者(49.4%)停止AS:274例因活检相关重新分类,121/404例(30%)因不符合方案标准的原因,9/404例(2.2%)因焦虑。活检重新分类与PSA密度(风险比[HR] 1.8)、核心受累的最大百分比(HR 1.5)、诊断性活检时的阳性核心(HR 1.6)、年龄较大(HR 1.5)以及前列腺体积(HR )相关(均p<0.01)。SAINT组的患者比PRIAS组的患者更有可能停止AS(HR 1.65,p<0.0001)。

结论

诊断后5年,50%的早期PCa患者无需接受积极治疗。广泛的纳入标准与较低的ATFS相关。然而,在初步分析中,这似乎并不影响不良病理的概率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224c/6379800/7c062e00fcf5/10.5301_tj.5000649-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224c/6379800/fe40decd6c31/10.5301_tj.5000649-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224c/6379800/484077557e41/10.5301_tj.5000649-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224c/6379800/75f77b36ee6c/10.5301_tj.5000649-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224c/6379800/7c062e00fcf5/10.5301_tj.5000649-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224c/6379800/fe40decd6c31/10.5301_tj.5000649-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224c/6379800/484077557e41/10.5301_tj.5000649-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224c/6379800/75f77b36ee6c/10.5301_tj.5000649-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224c/6379800/7c062e00fcf5/10.5301_tj.5000649-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Eleven-year management of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: what have we learned?前列腺癌患者11年的主动监测管理:我们学到了什么?
Tumori. 2017 Sep 18;103(5):464-474. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000649. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
2
Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study.全球低危前列腺癌的主动监测:PRIAS 研究。
Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
3
A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.PRIAS 研究中的十年主动监测:更新和评估推荐转为主动治疗的标准。
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
4
Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.符合前列腺癌研究国际主动监测(PRIAS)方案的比例和不遵守方案者的疾病再分类。
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.在真实队列中对前列腺癌进行主动监测:比较 PRIAS 合格和 PRIAS 不合格患者的结局。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Aug;1(3):231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 May 15.
6
Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.主动监测患者中与前列腺癌进展相关的活检特征:三种统计模型的比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):574-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11127.x. Epub 2012 May 4.
7
Predictors of unfavourable repeat biopsy results in men participating in a prospective active surveillance program.参与前瞻性主动监测项目的男性中,预测不利重复活检结果的因素。
Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):370-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.027. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
8
Indications for intervention during active surveillance of prostate cancer: a comparison of the Johns Hopkins and Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocols.主动监测前列腺癌期间干预的适应证:约翰霍普金斯大学和前列腺癌研究国际主动监测(PRIAS)方案的比较。
BJU Int. 2015 Feb;115(2):216-22. doi: 10.1111/bju.12828. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
9
A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.对于接受前列腺癌主动监测的男性,阴性确认性活检并不能保护他们免于组织学分级进展。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.038. Epub 2013 May 2.
10
Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.低危前列腺癌患者符合前列腺癌国际主动监测标准行根治性前列腺切除术的病理和生化结局。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):914-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11658.x. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.影响前列腺癌积极监测治疗决策和依从性的关键决定因素:一项系统综述。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):315. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070315.
2
Patient Reported Outcomes and Treatment-Associated Complications as a Consideration in Selecting Localized Prostate Cancer Management.患者报告的结局和治疗相关并发症作为选择局限性前列腺癌治疗方案时的考虑因素。
Res Rep Urol. 2025 Jun 12;17:195-210. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S386383. eCollection 2025.
3
Using active surveillance for Gleason 7 (3+4) prostate cancer: A narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
"What if…": decisional regret in patients who discontinued active surveillance.“如果……会怎样”:主动监测终止患者的决策性遗憾
Tumori. 2016 Dec 1;102(6):562-568. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000564. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
2
10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌监测、手术或放疗 10 年后的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
3
Prostate cancer changes in clinical presentation and treatments in two decades: an Italian population-based study.
对 Gleason 7(3+4)前列腺癌采用主动监测:一项叙述性综述。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Apr;18(4):135-144. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8539.
4
Patient and Context Factors in the Adoption of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.患者和环境因素对低危前列腺癌主动监测策略的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2338039. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.38039.
5
Low-risk prostate lesions: An evidence review to inform discussion on losing the "cancer" label.低危前列腺病变:一项旨在为“去癌症化”讨论提供证据的综述。
Prostate. 2023 May;83(6):498-515. doi: 10.1002/pros.24493. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
6
Cross-cultural differences in men on active surveillance' anxiety: a longitudinal comparison between Italian and Dutch patients from the Prostate cancer Research International Active Surveillance study.主动监测中男性的跨文化焦虑差异:来自前列腺癌研究国际主动监测研究的意大利和荷兰患者的纵向比较。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jul 18;22(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01062-z.
7
Does Protocol Make a Difference? Comparison of Two Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts: A Non-protocol-based Follow-up and a Protocol-based Contemporary Follow-up.方案是否有影响?两个前列腺癌主动监测队列的比较:基于非方案的随访和基于方案的当代随访。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Oct 28;34:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.016. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
National consensus quality indicators to assess quality of care for active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: An evidence-informed, modified Delphi survey of Canadian urologists/radiation oncologists.评估低风险前列腺癌主动监测护理质量的国家共识质量指标:一项基于证据的、对加拿大泌尿科医生/放射肿瘤学家的改良德尔菲调查。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Apr;16(4):E212-E219. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7466.
9
Endogenous testosterone density as ratio of endogenous testosterone levels on prostate volume predicts tumor upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.基于前列腺体积的内源性睾酮密度与内源性睾酮水平的比值可预测低危前列腺癌的肿瘤升级。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Dec;53(12):2505-2515. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-03008-0. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
10
Active surveillance for prostate cancer.前列腺癌的主动监测
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jun;10(6):2809-2819. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1370.
二十年来前列腺癌临床表现及治疗的变化:一项基于意大利人群的研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Nov;67:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
4
A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.PRIAS 研究中的十年主动监测:更新和评估推荐转为主动治疗的标准。
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
5
Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016.前列腺癌临床实践指南(2016 年版)
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jan;14(1):19-30. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0004.
6
Survival of male genital cancers (prostate, testis and penis) in Europe 1999-2007: Results from the EUROCARE-5 study.1999 - 2007年欧洲男性生殖系统癌症(前列腺癌、睾丸癌和阴茎癌)的生存率:EUROCARE - 5研究结果
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Oct;51(15):2206-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.027. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.一项针对低危前列腺癌的前瞻性主动监测计划的中期和长期结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3379-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.5764. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
8
Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer.前列腺癌大型主动监测队列患者的长期随访。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):272-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1192. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
9
How does active surveillance for prostate cancer affect quality of life? A systematic review.主动监测前列腺癌如何影响生活质量?系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):637-45. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.028. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
10
Extended followup and risk factors for disease reclassification in a large active surveillance cohort for localized prostate cancer.在一个针对局限性前列腺癌的大型主动监测队列中进行疾病重新分类的延长随访及风险因素研究。
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):807-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.094. Epub 2014 Sep 28.