Nayak Sandeep P, Pokharkar Harshwardhan, Gurawalia Jaiprakash, Dev Kapil, Chanduri Srinivas, Vijayakumar M
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Fortis Hospital and MACS Clinic, Jayanagar 4th Block West, Bangalore, 560 011 India.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;10(3):555-562. doi: 10.1007/s13193-019-00951-4. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
This retrospective study compared the immediate post-operative short-term outcomes of Lateral Approach-Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (L-VEIL) and open surgery approach in patients with TNM stage N0 and N1 tumors. Inguinal lymphadenectomies performed for various TNM stage N0 and N1 cancers between January 2011 and December 2015 at a single center were analyzed by collecting data from operation theater records and case files. Mean blood loss, operative time, drain output, nodal yield, nodal positivity, and complications were analyzed as post-procedural outcomes. Among the 116 surgeries performed, 92 were open surgery and 24 were L-VEIL. Compared with open surgery, L-VEIL led to significantly lower blood loss (64.8 mL vs. 23.3 mL; = 0.002), mean nodal yield (11.04 vs. 8.38; = 0.001), and mean hospital stay (3.08 vs. 8 days; < 0.001). However, the operative time was similar for both the groups (94.5 vs. 68.1 min; = 0.08). Complications that were significantly low in L-VEIL were flap necrosis [RR 1.29; 95% CI (1.03-1.72); < 0.001], wound dehiscence [RR 1.25; 95% CI (1.19-1.51); = 0.005), wound infection [RR 1.34; 95% CI (1.19-1.51); = 0.003], readmission [RR 1.3; 95% CI (1.17-1.44); = 0.005], and re-surgery [ = 0.014]. Occurrence of complications such as lymphocele [RR 1.25; 95% CI (0.33-4.78); = 0.5], lymphorrhea [RR 1.27; 95% CI (1.15-1.40); = 0.5], and pedal edema [ = 0.2] were similar for both the approaches. L-VEIL was effective and safe compared with open inguinal block dissection in treatment of various TNM stage N0 and N1 urogenital and skin cancers.
本回顾性研究比较了TNM分期为N0和N1期肿瘤患者行外侧入路-视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(L-VEIL)与开放手术入路后的近期短期疗效。收集了2011年1月至2015年12月在单一中心因各种TNM分期为N0和N1期癌症而行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的患者的手术室记录和病例档案数据进行分析。分析平均失血量、手术时间、引流量、淋巴结获取量、淋巴结阳性率及并发症等术后结果。在116例手术中,92例为开放手术,24例为L-VEIL。与开放手术相比,L-VEIL导致失血量显著降低(64.8 mL对23.3 mL;P = 0.002)、平均淋巴结获取量显著降低(11.04对8.38;P = 0.001)以及平均住院时间显著缩短(3.08天对8天;P < 0.001)。然而,两组的手术时间相似(94.5分钟对68.1分钟;P = 0.08)。L-VEIL中显著较低的并发症有皮瓣坏死[相对危险度(RR)1.29;95%置信区间(CI)(1.03 - 1.72);P < 0.001]、伤口裂开[RR 1.25;95% CI(1.19 - 1.51);P = 0.005]、伤口感染[RR 1.34;95% CI(1.19 - 1.51);P = 0.003]以及再次入院[RR 1.3;95% CI(1.17 - 1.44);P = 0.005]和再次手术(P = 0. 014)。两组淋巴管囊肿[RR 1.25;95% CI(0.33 - 4.78);P = 0.5]、淋巴漏[RR 1.27;95% CI(1.15 - 1.40);P = 0.5]以及足背水肿(P = 0.2)等并发症的发生率相似。与开放性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术相比,L-VEIL在治疗各种TNM分期为N0和N1期的泌尿生殖系统及皮肤癌方面有效且安全。