Oyeyemi Sunday Oluwafemi, Braaten Tonje, Botteri Edoardo, Berstad Paula, Borch Kristin Benjaminsen
Department of Community Medicine, Uit-the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Department of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 8;11:669-682. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S207413. eCollection 2019.
Norway has experienced an unexplained, steep increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in the last half-century, with large differences across its counties. We aimed to determine whether geographical distribution of lifestyle-related CRC risk factors can explain these geographical differences in CRC incidence in Norwegian women.
We followed a nationally representative cohort of 96,898 women with self-reported information on lifestyle-related CRC risk factors at baseline and at follow-up 6-8 years later in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. We categorized Norwegian counties into four county groups according to CRC incidence and used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk factors. We used the Karlson, Holm, and Breen (KHB) method of mediation analysis to investigate the extent to which the risk factors accounted for the observed differences in CRC incidence between counties.
During an average of 15.5 years of follow-up, 1875 CRC cases were diagnosed. Height (HR=1.12; 95% CI 1.08, 1.17 per 5 cm increase); being a former smoker who smoked ≥10 years (HR=1.34; 95% CI 1.15, 1.57); or being a current smoker who has smoked for ≥10 years (HR=1.28; 95% CI 1.12, 1.46) relative to never smokers was associated with increased CRC risk. Duration of education >12 years (HR=0.78; 95% CI 0.69, 0.87) vs ≤12 years, and intake of vegetables and fruits >300 g (HR=0.90; 95% CI 0.80, 0.99) vs ≤300 g per day were associated with reduced CRC risk. However, these risk factors did not account for the differences in CRC risk between geographical areas of low and high CRC incidence. This was further confirmed by the KHB method using baseline and follow-up measurements (=0.02, 95% CI -0.02, 0.06, =0.26).
Lifestyle-related CRC risk factors did not explain the geographical variations in CRC incidence among Norwegian women. Possible residual explanations may lie in heritable factors.
在过去半个世纪中,挪威的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率出现了 unexplained、急剧上升的情况,各县之间存在很大差异。我们旨在确定与生活方式相关的CRC危险因素的地理分布是否可以解释挪威女性CRC发病率的这些地理差异。
在挪威女性与癌症研究中,我们追踪了一个具有全国代表性的队列,该队列由96,898名女性组成,她们在基线时以及6至8年后的随访中自我报告了与生活方式相关的CRC危险因素信息。我们根据CRC发病率将挪威各县分为四个县组,并使用Cox比例风险模型来估计危险因素的风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。我们使用卡尔森、霍尔姆和布林(KHB)中介分析方法来研究这些危险因素在多大程度上解释了各县之间观察到的CRC发病率差异。
在平均15.5年的随访期间,共诊断出1875例CRC病例。身高(每增加5厘米,HR=1.12;95%CI 1.08,1.17);曾经吸烟≥10年的既往吸烟者(HR=1.34;95%CI 1.15,1.57);或目前吸烟≥10年的现吸烟者(HR=1.28;95%CI 1.12,1.46)相对于从不吸烟者,与CRC风险增加相关。教育年限>12年(HR=0.78;95%CI 0.69,0.87)与≤12年相比;以及每天蔬菜和水果摄入量>300克(HR=0.90;95%CI 0.80,0.99)与≤300克相比与CRC风险降低相关。然而,这些危险因素并未解释CRC发病率高低不同地理区域之间的风险差异。使用基线和随访测量的KHB方法进一步证实了这一点(=0.02,95%CI -0.02,0.06,=0.26)。
与生活方式相关的CRC危险因素并不能解释挪威女性中CRC发病率的地理差异。可能的剩余解释可能在于遗传因素。