J Refract Surg. 2019 Sep 1;35(9):559-564. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190806-01.
To compare the visual performance of mix-and-match implanted bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and bilateral implanted trifocal IOLs from the same manufacturer with the same IOL platform after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).
This prospective, comparative, non-randomized study included patients who underwent FLACS (LenSx; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas) with bilateral implantation of bifocal IOLs (ReSTOR +2.50 D/+3.00 D; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) or trifocal IOLs (PanOptix; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.). Visual acuities, manifest refraction, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, quality of life measured by the Visual Function Index (VF-14), and spectacle independence were assessed at 6 months after surgery.
A total of 70 eyes of 35 patients were included in this study. There was no difference in patient demographics and preoperative measurements between groups (P > .05). There was no difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity outcomes between groups (P > .05), but uncorrected intermediate visual acuity and uncorrected near visual acuity outcomes were significantly better in the PanOptix group (P < .01). Correspondingly, the binocular defocus curve of the PanOptix IOLs showed significantly better visual acuity between -1.00 and -3.00 diopters compared to the ReSTOR IOLs (P < .05). The PanOptix group showed higher contrast sensitivity scores than the ReSTOR group for 12 and 18 spatial frequencies in photopic conditions and for 18 spatial frequencies in mesopic conditions (P < .05). The average VF-14 score was similar between groups (P = .78). None of the patients required spectacles.
Bilateral implanted PanOptix IOLs seem to provide better intermediate and near vision, defocus curve, and contrast sensitivity compared to mix-and-match implanted ReSTOR IOLs. However, similar vision-related quality of life and spectacle independence were achieved with both IOLs. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(9):559-564.].
比较飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)后同种制造商、同平台的混合匹配植入式双焦点人工晶状体(IOL)与双侧植入式三焦点 IOL 的视觉性能。
本前瞻性、对照、非随机研究纳入了接受 FLACS(LenSx;爱尔康公司,德克萨斯州沃思堡)治疗并双侧植入双焦点 IOL(ReSTOR +2.50 D/+3.00 D;爱尔康公司)或三焦点 IOL(PanOptix;爱尔康公司)的患者。术后 6 个月评估视力、客观验光、离焦曲线、对比敏感度、生活质量(通过视觉功能指数[VF-14]评估)和眼镜依赖情况。
本研究共纳入 35 例患者的 70 只眼。组间患者人口统计学和术前测量值无差异(P>.05)。组间未矫正远视力和矫正远视力结果无差异(P>.05),但 PanOptix 组的未矫正中间视力和未矫正近视力明显更好(P<.01)。相应地,PanOptix IOL 的双眼离焦曲线在-1.00 至-3.00 屈光度之间显示出明显更好的视力(P<.05)。在明适应条件下 12 和 18 空间频率以及中适应条件下 18 空间频率,PanOptix 组的对比敏感度评分均高于 ReSTOR 组(P<.05)。组间平均 VF-14 评分相似(P=.78)。无患者需要戴眼镜。
与混合匹配植入的 ReSTOR IOL 相比,双侧植入的 PanOptix IOL 似乎提供了更好的中间和近视力、离焦曲线和对比敏感度。然而,两种 IOL 均实现了相似的与视觉相关的生活质量和眼镜独立性。