Division of Clinical Informatics and Digital Transformation, University of California, San Francisco.
American Board of Family Medicine, Center for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, Washington, DC.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426956. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26956.
Electronic health record (EHR) work has been associated with decreased physician well-being. Understanding the association between EHR usability and physician satisfaction and burnout, and whether team and technology strategies moderate this association, is critical to informing efforts to address EHR-associated physician burnout.
To measure family physician satisfaction with their EHR and EHR usability across functions and evaluate the association of EHR usability with satisfaction and burnout, as well as the moderating association of 4 team and technology EHR efficiency strategies.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study uses data from a cross-sectional survey conducted from December 12, 2021, to October 17, 2022, of all family physicians seeking American Board of Family Medicine recertification in 2022.
Physicians perceived EHR usability across 6 domains, as well as adoption of 4 EHR efficiency strategies: scribes, support from other staff, templated text, and voice recognition or transcription.
Physician EHR satisfaction and frequency of experiencing burnout measured with a single survey item ("I feel burned out from my work"), with answers ranging from "never" to "every day."
Of the 2067 physicians (1246 [60.3%] younger than 50 years; 1051 men [50.9%]; and 1729 [86.0%] practicing in an urban area) who responded to the survey, 562 (27.2%) were very satisfied and 775 (37.5%) were somewhat satisfied, while 346 (16.7%) were somewhat dissatisfied and 198 (9.6%) were very dissatisfied with their EHR. Readability of information had the highest usability, with 543 physicians (26.3%) rating it as excellent, while usefulness of alerts had the lowest usability, with 262 physicians (12.7%) rating it as excellent. In multivariable models, good or excellent usability for entering data (β = 0.09 [95% CI, 0.05-0.14]; P < .001), alignment with workflow processes (β = 0.11 [95% CI, 0.06-0.16]; P < .001), ease of finding information (β = 0.14 [95% CI, 0.09-0.19]; P < .001), and usefulness of alerts (β = 0.11 [95% CI, 0.06-0.16]; P < .001) were associated with physicians being very satisfied with their EHR. In addition, being very satisfied with the EHR was associated with reduced frequency of burnout (β = -0.64 [95% CI, -1.06 to -0.22]; P < .001). In moderation analysis, only physicians with highly usable EHRs saw improvements in satisfaction from adopting efficiency strategies.
In this survey study of physician EHR usability and satisfaction, approximately one-fourth of family physicians reported being very satisfied with their EHR, while another one-fourth reported being somewhat or very dissatisfied, a concerning finding amplified by the inverse association between EHR satisfaction and burnout. Electronic health record-based alerts had the lowest reported usability, suggesting EHR vendors should focus their efforts on improving alerts. Electronic health record efficiency strategies were broadly adopted, but only physicians with highly usable EHRs realized gains in EHR satisfaction from using these strategies, suggesting that EHR burden-reduction interventions are likely to have heterogenous associations across physicians with different EHRs.
电子健康记录 (EHR) 的工作与医生的幸福感降低有关。了解 EHR 可用性与医生满意度和倦怠之间的关联,以及团队和技术策略是否对这种关联进行调节,对于解决与 EHR 相关的医生倦怠问题至关重要。
衡量家庭医生对其 EHR 的满意度及其在各个功能中的可用性,并评估 EHR 可用性与满意度和倦怠之间的关联,以及 4 种 EHR 效率策略的调节关联。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究使用了 2022 年 12 月 12 日至 2022 年 10 月 17 日期间对所有寻求美国家庭医学委员会重新认证的家庭医生进行的横断面调查的数据。
医生对其 EHR 的可用性有 6 个方面的看法,以及采用了 4 种 EHR 效率策略:抄写员、其他员工的支持、模板文本和语音识别或转录。
使用单一调查项目测量医生的 EHR 满意度和倦怠频率(“我对工作感到倦怠”,答案范围从“从不”到“每天”)。
在回答调查的 2067 名医生(50 岁以下的 1246 名[60.3%];1051 名男性[50.9%];1729 名[86.0%]在城市地区行医)中,562 名(27.2%)非常满意,775 名(37.5%)比较满意,346 名(16.7%)有些不满意,198 名(9.6%)非常不满意他们的 EHR。信息的可读性可用性最高,有 543 名医生(26.3%)认为它是优秀的,而警报的有用性可用性最低,有 262 名医生(12.7%)认为它是优秀的。在多变量模型中,数据输入的良好或优秀的可用性(β=0.09 [95% CI,0.05-0.14];P<0.001)、与工作流程的一致性(β=0.11 [95% CI,0.06-0.16];P<0.001)、查找信息的容易程度(β=0.14 [95% CI,0.09-0.19];P<0.001)和警报的有用性(β=0.11 [95% CI,0.06-0.16];P<0.001)与医生对其 EHR 非常满意有关。此外,对 EHR 非常满意与倦怠频率降低有关(β=-0.64 [95% CI,-1.06 至 -0.22];P<0.001)。在适度分析中,只有 EHR 非常可用的医生才会从采用效率策略中提高满意度。
在这项关于医生 EHR 可用性和满意度的调查研究中,大约四分之一的家庭医生表示对他们的 EHR 非常满意,而另有四分之一表示有些或非常不满意,这一令人担忧的发现因 EHR 满意度与倦怠之间的反比关系而加剧。基于 EHR 的警报报告的可用性最低,这表明 EHR 供应商应集中精力提高警报的质量。EHR 效率策略得到了广泛采用,但只有 EHR 非常可用的医生才从使用这些策略中获得了 EHR 满意度的提高,这表明 EHR 减负干预措施可能在不同 EHR 的医生中存在异质性关联。