Department of Neuroscience & Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Italy; Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy.
Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Italy.
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:441-456. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
Executive functions refer to high-level cognitive processes that, by operating on lower-level mental processes, flexibly regulate and control our thoughts and goal-directed behavior. Despite their crucial role, the study of the nature and organization of executive functions still faces inherent difficulties. Moreover, most executive function models put under test until now are brain-free models: they are defined and discussed without assumptions regarding the neural bases of executive functions. By using a latent variable approach, here we tested a brain-centered model of executive function organization proposing that two distinct domain-general executive functions, namely, criterion setting and monitoring, may be dissociable both functionally and anatomically, with a left versus right hemispheric preference of prefrontal cortex and related neural networks, respectively. To this end, we tested a sample of healthy participants on a battery of computerized tasks assessing criterion setting and monitoring processes and involving diverse task domains, including the verbal and visuospatial ones, which are well-known to be lateralized. By doing this, we were able to specifically assess the influence of these task domains on the organization of executive functions and to directly contrast a process-based model of EF organization versus both a purely domain-based model and a process-based, but domain-dependent one. The results of confirmatory factor analyses showed that a purely process-based model reliably provided a better fit to the observed data as compared to alternative models, supporting the specific theoretical model that fractionates a subset of executive functions into criterion setting and monitoring with hemispheric specializations emerging regardless of the task domain.
执行功能是指高级认知过程,通过对较低水平的心理过程进行操作,灵活地调节和控制我们的思维和目标导向行为。尽管它们具有至关重要的作用,但执行功能的本质和组织的研究仍然面临着固有的困难。此外,到目前为止,大多数接受测试的执行功能模型都是无大脑模型:它们是在不考虑执行功能的神经基础的情况下定义和讨论的。通过使用潜在变量方法,我们在这里测试了一个以大脑为中心的执行功能组织模型,该模型提出,两个不同的领域一般性执行功能,即标准设定和监测,可以在功能和解剖学上分离,分别与左、右前额叶皮层和相关神经网络的偏好有关。为此,我们对一组健康参与者进行了一系列计算机化任务的测试,这些任务评估了标准设定和监测过程,并涉及多个任务领域,包括言语和视空间领域,这些领域众所周知是偏侧化的。通过这样做,我们能够专门评估这些任务领域对执行功能组织的影响,并直接对比基于过程的执行功能组织模型与纯粹基于领域的模型和基于过程但依赖于领域的模型。验证性因素分析的结果表明,与替代模型相比,纯粹基于过程的模型能够更可靠地拟合观察到的数据,支持将一组执行功能细分为标准设定和监测的特定理论模型,并且无论任务领域如何,都会出现半球专业化。