Suppr超能文献

评价β-内酰胺类抗生素延长与标准输注的研究。

Evaluation of studies on extended versus standard infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics.

机构信息

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.

Department of Pharmacy, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Sep 3;76(18):1383-1394. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz154.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To summarize the current literature on the use and clinical efficacy of extended-infusion (EI) beta-lactam antibiotics, including piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, and cefepime.

SUMMARY

Gram-negative infections are a serious concern among hospitalized patients and require innovative pharmacokinetic dosing strategies to achieve clinical success, especially as the emergence of resistant gram-negative pathogens has outpaced the development of new antibiotics. Beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit time-dependent activity, which means that optimal efficacy is achieved when free drug concentrations stay above the minimum inhibitory concentration for an extended duration of the recommended dosage interval. EI piperacillin-tazobactam therapy has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes and decrease mortality in critically ill patients with gram-negative infections, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. EI meropenem has shown higher therapeutic success rates for patients with febrile neutropenia and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) with a reduction in ventilator days in patients with multidrug-resistant ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, a larger study showed no difference in clinical outcomes between standard-infusion and EI meropenem. EI cefepime has been associated with decreased mortality and shorter ICU LOS in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Common challenges associated with EI beta-lactam antibiotics include Y-site incompatibilities, lack of intravenous access, and tubing residuals. It is important to note that factors such as diverse patient populations and study methodology, along with various antibiotic dose regimens, may have contributed to conflicting data on EI beta-lactam therapy.

CONCLUSION

Based on most published literature, there appears to be a favorable trend toward use of EI beta-lactam therapy in clinical practice, particularly in critically ill patients with gram-negative infections.

摘要

目的

总结目前关于延长输注(EI)β-内酰胺类抗生素(包括哌拉西林他唑巴坦、美罗培南和头孢吡肟)使用和临床疗效的文献。

摘要

住院患者严重关注革兰氏阴性感染,需要创新的药代动力学剂量策略来取得临床成功,尤其是随着耐药革兰氏阴性病原体的出现速度超过新抗生素的开发速度。β-内酰胺类抗生素表现出时间依赖性活性,这意味着在推荐的给药间隔内,游离药物浓度保持在最低抑菌浓度以上的延长时间时,可获得最佳疗效。EI 哌拉西林他唑巴坦治疗在治疗革兰氏阴性感染,尤其是铜绿假单胞菌感染的重症患者中,已显示出改善的临床结果和降低死亡率。EI 美罗培南在发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中显示出更高的治疗成功率,以及 ICU 住院时间(LOS)缩短,同时减少多重耐药性呼吸机相关性肺炎患者的呼吸机天数。然而,一项更大的研究表明,标准输注和 EI 美罗培南之间在临床结局方面没有差异。EI 头孢吡肟与铜绿假单胞菌感染患者的死亡率降低和 ICU LOS 缩短相关。与 EIβ-内酰胺类抗生素相关的常见挑战包括 Y 型部位不相容性、缺乏静脉通路和管腔残留。值得注意的是,患者人群的多样性、研究方法以及各种抗生素剂量方案等因素可能导致 EIβ-内酰胺治疗的数据存在冲突。

结论

根据大多数已发表的文献,EIβ-内酰胺类抗生素在临床实践中的应用似乎呈现出有利的趋势,特别是在治疗革兰氏阴性感染的重症患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验