Suppr超能文献

使用单案例实验设计测试青少年干预结果的中介因素

Testing Mediators of Youth Intervention Outcomes Using Single-Case Experimental Designs.

作者信息

Geuke Gemma G M, Maric Marija, Miočević Milica, Wolters Lidewij H, de Haan Else

机构信息

Utrecht University.

University of Amsterdam.

出版信息

New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2019 Sep;2019(167):39-64. doi: 10.1002/cad.20310. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

Abstract

The major aim of this manuscript is to bring together two important topics that have recently received much attention in child and adolescent research, albeit separately from each other: single-case experimental designs and statistical mediation analysis. Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are increasingly recognized as a valuable alternative for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to test intervention effects in youth populations. Statistical mediation analysis helps provide understanding about the most potent mechanisms of change underlying youth intervention outcomes. In this manuscript we: (i) describe the conceptual framework and outline desiderata for methods for mediation analysis in SCEDs; (ii) describe the main aspects of several data-analytic techniques potentially useful to test mediation in SCEDs; (iii) apply these methods to a single-case treatment data set from one clinically anxious client; and (iv) discuss pros and cons of these methods for testing mediation in SCEDs, and provide future directions.

摘要

本手稿的主要目的是将两个重要主题结合起来,这两个主题最近在儿童和青少年研究中备受关注,尽管此前是分别研究的:单案例实验设计和统计中介分析。单案例实验设计(SCEDs)越来越被认为是随机对照试验(RCTs)的一种有价值的替代方法,用于测试青年人群中的干预效果。统计中介分析有助于深入了解青年干预结果背后最有效的变化机制。在本手稿中,我们:(i)描述单案例实验设计中介分析方法的概念框架并概述其要求;(ii)描述几种可能有助于测试单案例实验设计中介效应的数据分析技术的主要方面;(iii)将这些方法应用于来自一名临床焦虑症患者的单案例治疗数据集;(iv)讨论这些方法在测试单案例实验设计中介效应方面的优缺点,并提供未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9601/6772063/48e7869b0160/CAD-2019-39-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验