Van Laar Colette, Meeussen Loes, Veldman Jenny, Van Grootel Sanne, Sterk Naomi, Jacobs Catho
Department of Psychology, Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 27;10:1879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01879. eCollection 2019.
Despite changes in their representation and visibility, there are still serious concerns about the inclusion and day-to-day workplace challenges various groups face (e.g., women, ethnic and cultural minorities, LGBTQ+, people as they age, and those dealing with physical or mental disabilities). Men are also underrepresented in specific work fields, in particular those in Health care, Elementary Education, and the Domestic sphere (HEED). Previous literature has shown that group stereotypes play an important role in maintaining these inequalities. We outline how insights from research into stigma, social identity, and self-regulation together increase our understanding of how targets are affected by and regulate negative stereotypes in the workplace. This approach starts from the basis that members of negatively stereotyped groups are not just passive recipients of negative attitudes, stereotypes, and behaviors but are active individuals pursuing multiple goals, such as goals for belonging and achievement. We argue that it is only by understanding stigma from the target's perspective (e.g., how targets are affected and respond) that we can successfully address workplace inequality. Key in this understanding is that stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination have taken on much more subtle forms, with consequences for the way members of stigmatized groups cope. These insights lead us to propose an approach to understanding barriers to workplace equality that highlights four key aspects: (1) the different (often subtle) potential triggers of identity threat in the workplace for members of stigmatized groups; (2) the ways in which members of stigmatized groups cope with these threats; (3) the role of supportive factors that mitigate potential threats and affect self-regulation; and (4) potential hidden costs for the self or others of what appears at first to be effective self-regulation. The focus on threats, coping, support, and potential hidden costs helps us understand why current diversity efforts are not always successful in increasing and maintaining members of stigmatized groups in organizations and provides insight into how we can aid efforts to effectively lower barriers to workplace equality.
尽管不同群体的代表性和可见度有所变化,但对于各类群体(例如女性、少数族裔和文化群体、 LGBTQ+ 群体、老年人以及身体或精神残疾者)在工作场所的融入情况以及日常面临的挑战,仍存在严重担忧。男性在特定工作领域的代表性也不足,尤其是在医疗保健、基础教育和家庭领域(HEED)。以往的文献表明,群体刻板印象在维持这些不平等方面起着重要作用。我们概述了污名、社会认同和自我调节研究的见解如何共同增进我们对目标群体在工作场所如何受到负面刻板印象影响以及如何对其进行调节的理解。这种方法基于这样一个前提,即受到负面刻板印象影响的群体成员不仅仅是负面态度、刻板印象和行为的被动接受者,而是积极追求多种目标(如归属感和成就目标)的个体。我们认为,只有从目标群体的角度理解污名(例如目标群体如何受到影响以及如何做出反应),我们才能成功解决工作场所的不平等问题。这种理解的关键在于,刻板印象、偏见和歧视已经呈现出更为微妙的形式,这对受污名化群体成员的应对方式产生了影响。这些见解促使我们提出一种理解工作场所平等障碍的方法,该方法突出四个关键方面:(1)受污名化群体成员在工作场所面临的不同(通常很微妙)的身份威胁潜在触发因素;(2)受污名化群体成员应对这些威胁的方式;(3)减轻潜在威胁并影响自我调节的支持性因素的作用;(4)乍一看有效的自我调节对自身或他人可能产生的潜在隐藏成本。对威胁、应对、支持和潜在隐藏成本的关注有助于我们理解为什么当前的多元化努力在增加和留住组织中受污名化群体成员方面并不总是成功的,并为我们如何有效降低工作场所平等障碍提供了见解。