Suppr超能文献

左旋多巴-卡比多巴肠凝胶输注与丘脑底核深部脑刺激治疗晚期帕金森病的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Comparison Between Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Infusion and Subthalamic Nucleus Deep-Brain Stimulation for Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Liu Xiao Dong, Bao Yi, Liu Guang Jian

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 27;10:934. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00934. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Currently, some advanced treatments such as Levodopa-Carbidopa intestinal gel infusion (LCIG), deep-brain stimulation (DBS), and subcutaneous apomorphine infusion have become alternative strategies for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, which treatment is better for individual patients remains unclear. This review aims to compare therapeutic effects of motor and/or non-motor symptoms of advanced PD patients between LCIG and DBS. We manually searched electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) and reference lists of included articles published until April 04, 2019 using related terms, without language restriction. We included case-controlled cohort studies and randomized-controlled trials, which directly compared differences between LCIG and DBS. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), proposed by the Cochrane Collaboration, was utilized to assess the quality of the included studies. Two investigators independently extracted data from each trial. Pooled standard-mean differences (SMDs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by meta-analysis. Outcomes were grouped according to the part III and part IV of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and adverse events. We also descriptively reviewed some data, which were unavailable for statistical analysis. This review included five cohort trials of 257 patients for meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between LCIG and subthalamic nucleus deep-brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on UPDRS-III and adverse events comparisons: UPDRS-III (pooled SMDs = 0.200, 95% CI: -0.126-0.527, = 0.230), total adverse events (pooled RRs = 1.279, 95% CI: 0.983-1.664, = 0.067), serious adverse events (pooled RRs = 1.539, 95% CI: 0.664-3.566, = 0.315). Notably, the improvement of UPDRS-IV was more significant in STN-DBS groups: pooled SMDs = 0.857, 95% CI: 0.130-1.584, = 0.021. However, the heterogeneity was moderate for UPDRS-IV ( = 73.8%). LCIG has comparable effects to STN-DBS on motor function for advanced PD, with acceptable tolerability. More large, well-designed trials are needed to assess the comparability of LCIG and STN-DBS in the future.

摘要

目前,一些先进的治疗方法,如左旋多巴 - 卡比多巴肠凝胶输注(LCIG)、脑深部电刺激(DBS)和皮下阿扑吗啡输注,已成为晚期帕金森病(PD)的替代治疗策略。然而,哪种治疗方法对个体患者更好仍不清楚。本综述旨在比较LCIG和DBS对晚期PD患者运动和/或非运动症状的治疗效果。我们使用相关术语手动检索了电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆)以及截至2019年4月4日发表的纳入文章的参考文献列表,无语言限制。我们纳入了直接比较LCIG和DBS差异的病例对照队列研究和随机对照试验。采用Cochrane协作组织提出的纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华量表(NOS)来评估纳入研究的质量。两名研究人员独立从每个试验中提取数据。通过荟萃分析计算合并标准均数差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)的相对风险(RR)。结果根据统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)的第三部分和第四部分以及不良事件进行分组。我们还对一些无法进行统计分析的数据进行了描述性综述。本综述纳入了五项队列试验,共257例患者进行荟萃分析。在UPDRS - III和不良事件比较方面,LCIG与丘脑底核脑深部电刺激(STN - DBS)之间无显著差异:UPDRS - III(合并SMD = 0.200,95% CI: - 0.126 - 0.527,P = 0.230),总不良事件(合并RR = 1.279,95% CI:0.983 - 1.664,P = 0.067),严重不良事件(合并RR = 1.539,95% CI:0.664 - 3.566,P = 0.315)。值得注意的是,STN - DBS组中UPDRS - IV的改善更为显著:合并SMD = 0.857,95% CI:0.130 - 1.584,P = 0.021。然而,UPDRS - IV的异质性为中度(I² = 73.8%)。对于晚期PD,LCIG在运动功能方面与STN - DBS具有相当的效果,耐受性可接受。未来需要更多大规模、设计良好的试验来评估LCIG和STN - DBS的可比性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb4/6718716/824c03aff5fd/fneur-10-00934-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验