• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位(SES)对荷兰教育成就遗传差异的调节作用。

The moderating role of SES on genetic differences in educational achievement in the Netherlands.

作者信息

de Zeeuw Eveline L, Kan Kees-Jan, van Beijsterveldt Catharina E M, Mbarek Hamdi, Hottenga Jouke-Jan, Davies Gareth E, Neale Michael C, Dolan Conor V, Boomsma Dorret I

机构信息

1Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

2Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

NPJ Sci Learn. 2019 Sep 3;4:13. doi: 10.1038/s41539-019-0052-2. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1038/s41539-019-0052-2
PMID:31508241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6722095/
Abstract

Parental socioeconomic status (SES) is a strong predictor of children's educational achievement (EA), with an increasing effect throughout development. Inequality in educational outcomes between children from different SES backgrounds exists in all Western countries. It has been proposed that a cause of this inequality lies in the interplay between genetic effects and SES on EA, which might depend on society and the equality of the education system. This study adopted two approaches, a classical twin design and polygenic score (PGS) approach, to address the effect of parental SES on EA in a large sample of 12-year-old Dutch twin pairs (2479 MZ and 4450 DZ twin pairs with PGSs for educational attainment available in 2335 children) from the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR). The findings of this study indicated that average EA increased with increasing parental SES. The difference in EA between boys and girls became smaller in the higher SES groups. The classical twin design analyses based on genetic covariance structure modeling pointed to lower genetic, environmental, and thus phenotypic variation in EA at higher SES. Independent from a child's PGS, parental SES predicted EA. However, the strength of the association between PGS and EA did not depend on parental SES. In a within-family design, the twin with a higher PGS scored higher on EA than the co-twin, demonstrating that the effect of the PGS on EA was at least partly independent from parental SES. To conclude, EA depended on SES both directly and indirectly, and SES moderated the additive genetic and environmental components of EA. Adding information from PGS, in addition to parental SES, improved the prediction of children's EA.

摘要

父母的社会经济地位(SES)是儿童教育成就(EA)的有力预测指标,且在整个发育过程中的影响不断增加。所有西方国家都存在来自不同社会经济背景的儿童在教育成果上的不平等现象。有人提出,这种不平等的一个原因在于基因效应和社会经济地位对教育成就的相互作用,这可能取决于社会和教育系统的平等程度。本研究采用了两种方法,即经典双胞胎设计和多基因分数(PGS)方法,以探讨父母社会经济地位对来自荷兰双胞胎登记处(NTR)的大量12岁荷兰双胞胎对(2479对同卵双胞胎和4450对异卵双胞胎,2335名儿童有教育成就的多基因分数)的教育成就的影响。本研究结果表明,平均教育成就随着父母社会经济地位的提高而增加。在社会经济地位较高的群体中,男孩和女孩在教育成就上的差异变小。基于遗传协方差结构建模的经典双胞胎设计分析表明,在社会经济地位较高时,教育成就的遗传、环境以及表型变异较低。独立于儿童的多基因分数,父母的社会经济地位可预测教育成就。然而,多基因分数与教育成就之间关联的强度并不取决于父母的社会经济地位。在家庭内部设计中,多基因分数较高的双胞胎在教育成就上的得分高于其同胞双胞胎,这表明多基因分数对教育成就的影响至少部分独立于父母的社会经济地位。总之,教育成就直接和间接地依赖于社会经济地位,并且社会经济地位调节了教育成就的加性遗传和环境成分。除了父母的社会经济地位外,加入多基因分数的信息可改善对儿童教育成就的预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/57cf72a30efa/41539_2019_52_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/f83e3aa18583/41539_2019_52_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/8b0a98cba06f/41539_2019_52_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/e453927f4dfa/41539_2019_52_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/20980e2bffab/41539_2019_52_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/57cf72a30efa/41539_2019_52_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/f83e3aa18583/41539_2019_52_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/8b0a98cba06f/41539_2019_52_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/e453927f4dfa/41539_2019_52_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/20980e2bffab/41539_2019_52_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe4/6722095/57cf72a30efa/41539_2019_52_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The moderating role of SES on genetic differences in educational achievement in the Netherlands.社会经济地位(SES)对荷兰教育成就遗传差异的调节作用。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2019 Sep 3;4:13. doi: 10.1038/s41539-019-0052-2. eCollection 2019.
2
Genetic Risk for Smoking: Disentangling Interplay Between Genes and Socioeconomic Status.遗传因素与吸烟行为:解析基因与社会经济地位的相互作用。
Behav Genet. 2022 Mar;52(2):92-107. doi: 10.1007/s10519-021-10094-4. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
Educational attainment polygenic scores, socioeconomic factors, and cortical structure in children and adolescents.教育程度多基因评分、社会经济因素与儿童和青少年的皮质结构。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Nov;43(16):4886-4900. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26034. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
4
The Nature of Nurture: Using a Virtual-Parent Design to Test Parenting Effects on Children's Educational Attainment in Genotyped Families.后天培养的本质:利用虚拟父母设计测试基因分型家庭中养育方式对孩子学业成就的影响。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2018 Apr;21(2):73-83. doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.11. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
5
Intergenerational Transmission of Education and ADHD: Effects of Parental Genotypes.代际传递的教育与 ADHD:父母基因型的影响。
Behav Genet. 2020 Jul;50(4):221-232. doi: 10.1007/s10519-020-09992-w. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
6
The polygenic and reactive nature of observed parenting.观察到的养育方式的多基因和反应性本质。
Genes Brain Behav. 2023 Dec;22(6):e12874. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12874. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
7
Intergenerational transmission of genetic risk for hyperactivity and inattention. Direct genetic transmission or genetic nurture?多动与注意力不集中遗传风险的代际传递。直接遗传传递还是遗传教养?
JCPP Adv. 2024 Mar 4;4(2):e12222. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12222. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Cognitive and brain development is independently influenced by socioeconomic status and polygenic scores for educational attainment.认知和大脑发育受到社会经济地位和教育成就多基因评分的独立影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 2;117(22):12411-12418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001228117. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Where you live matters: visualizing environmental effects on reading attainment.居住地很重要:可视化环境对阅读成绩的影响。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;65(6):798-808. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13909. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
10
Direct and Indirect Genetic Effects on Aggression.对攻击性的直接和间接遗传效应。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 Apr 29;3(4):958-968. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.04.006. eCollection 2023 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Interaction of family SES with children's genetic propensity for cognitive and noncognitive skills: No evidence of the Scarr-Rowe hypothesis for educational outcomes.家庭社会经济地位与儿童认知和非认知技能的遗传倾向之间的相互作用:没有证据支持斯卡尔-罗假设对教育成果的影响。
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2024 Aug;92:100960. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100960.
2
Intergenerational transmission of health inequalities: towards a life course approach to socioeconomic inequalities in health - a review.代际传递的健康不平等:走向生命历程方法以研究健康的社会经济不平等——综述
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Aug 25;78(10):641-649. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-220162.
3

本文引用的文献

1
DNA methylation signatures of educational attainment.受教育程度的DNA甲基化特征
NPJ Sci Learn. 2018 Mar 23;3:7. doi: 10.1038/s41539-018-0020-2. eCollection 2018.
2
Differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non-selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them.就读于择优录取学校和非择优录取学校的学生在考试成绩上的差异反映了他们之间的基因差异。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2018 Mar 23;3:3. doi: 10.1038/s41539-018-0019-8. eCollection 2018.
3
Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals.
Gene-environment interaction analysis of school quality and educational inequality.
学校质量与教育不平等的基因-环境交互作用分析
NPJ Sci Learn. 2024 Mar 1;9(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41539-024-00225-x.
4
Are Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Psychopathology Amplified in Children with Below-Average Intelligence? A Population-Based Twin Study.精神病理学的遗传和环境风险因素是否在智力低于平均水平的儿童中放大?一项基于人群的双胞胎研究。
Behav Genet. 2024 May;54(3):278-289. doi: 10.1007/s10519-023-10174-7. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
The relationship of school performance with self-control and grit is strongly genetic and weakly causal.学业成绩与自我控制和毅力之间的关系具有很强的遗传性,因果关系较弱。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2023 Dec 4;8(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s41539-023-00198-3.
6
Self-control and grit are associated with school performance mainly because of shared genetic effects.自我控制和毅力与学业成绩相关,主要是由于共同的基因效应。
JCPP Adv. 2023 Apr 26;3(2):e12159. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12159. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Environment-by-PGS Interaction in the Classical Twin Design: An Application to Childhood Anxiety and Negative Affect.环境与 PGx 交互作用在经典双生子设计中的应用:以儿童期焦虑和负性情绪为例。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):1198-1210. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2023.2228763. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
8
Schooling substantially improves intelligence, but neither lessens nor widens the impacts of socioeconomics and genetics.学校教育能显著提高智力,但既不会减轻也不会扩大社会经济和基因的影响。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2022 Dec 15;7(1):33. doi: 10.1038/s41539-022-00148-5.
9
Risk factors and consequences of traumatic brain injury in a Swiss male population cohort.瑞士男性人群队列中创伤性脑损伤的风险因素和后果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 21;12(7):e055986. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055986.
10
Delayed tracking and inequality of opportunity: Gene-environment interactions in educational attainment.延迟追踪与机会不平等:教育成就中的基因-环境相互作用
NPJ Sci Learn. 2022 May 4;7(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41539-022-00122-1.
从一项涉及 110 万人的教育程度全基因组关联研究中发现基因并进行多基因预测。
Nat Genet. 2018 Jul 23;50(8):1112-1121. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3.
4
Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies.五项纵向研究中的社会阶层流动的遗传分析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 31;115(31):E7275-E7284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801238115. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
5
Trends in health inequalities in 27 European countries.27 个欧洲国家健康不平等趋势。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):6440-6445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800028115. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
6
The Nature of Nurture: Using a Virtual-Parent Design to Test Parenting Effects on Children's Educational Attainment in Genotyped Families.后天培养的本质:利用虚拟父母设计测试基因分型家庭中养育方式对孩子学业成就的影响。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2018 Apr;21(2):73-83. doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.11. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
7
The nature of nurture: Effects of parental genotypes.教养的本质:父母基因型的影响。
Science. 2018 Jan 26;359(6374):424-428. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6877.
8
Socioeconomic status and genetic influences on cognitive development.社会经济地位和遗传对认知发展的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 19;114(51):13441-13446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708491114. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Can We Validate the Results of Twin Studies? A Census-Based Study on the Heritability of Educational Achievement.我们能否验证双胞胎研究的结果?一项基于人口普查的教育成就遗传性研究。
Front Genet. 2017 Oct 26;8:160. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00160. eCollection 2017.
10
An epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis of educational attainment.一项全基因组关联研究荟萃分析教育程度。
Mol Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;22(12):1680-1690. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.210. Epub 2017 Oct 31.