• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在比利时佛兰德斯,寻求超出法律限制的堕胎女性的特征。

Characteristics of Women Who Present for Abortion Beyond the Legal Limit in Flanders, Belgium.

机构信息

Centre for Population, Family and Health and the Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Centre for Population, Family and Health.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Sep;51(3):175-183. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12116. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1363/psrh.12116
PMID:31509652
Abstract

CONTEXT

Women who seek abortion care beyond the first trimester of gestation are often in a vulnerable socioeconomic position with limited social support, and in Belgium, the details of their circumstances are insufficiently understood. A better understanding of this group is essential to a critical evaluation of Belgian abortion policy, which restricts abortions on request after the first trimester.

METHODS

Anonymized patient records were collected between 2013 and 2016 from LUNA centers, which are non-hospital-based abortion clinics in Flanders. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify associations between women's characteristics and whether they presented within or beyond the legal limit, which was 13 weeks and 1 day at the time of the study.

RESULTS

A total of 28,741 women requested an abortion, and 972 individuals (3.4%) presented beyond the legal limit; 29% of these latter women were unable to receive abortion care as a result of the mandatory six-day waiting period. Characteristics positively associated with presenting beyond the limit, instead of beforehand, were being younger than 20, as opposed to 20-24 (odds ratio, 1.7); receiving a primary, lower secondary, upper secondary or special-needs education, rather than a higher education (1.8-3.1); being unemployed, rather than employed (1.3); and holding Belgian rather than a foreign nationality (0.8). Being accompanied by someone to the LUNA center (0.8), having irregularly (0.6) or regularly used contraceptives (0.7), and having ever had an abortion (0.8) were negatively associated with presenting beyond, rather than before, the limit.

CONCLUSIONS

A fuller consideration of patients' characteristics when evaluating Belgian abortion policy is needed to ensure that the needs and rights of socioeconomically vulnerable women are addressed.

摘要

背景

寻求妊娠 13 周以上堕胎服务的女性通常处于弱势的社会经济地位,社会支持有限,而在比利时,对她们的情况了解不足。为了对限制妊娠 13 周后要求堕胎的比利时堕胎政策进行批判性评估,了解这一群体至关重要。

方法

2013 年至 2016 年,从非医院式堕胎诊所 LUNA 中心收集匿名患者记录。采用逻辑回归分析,确定女性特征与她们是否在法律限制内或超出法律限制就诊之间的关联,研究时的法律限制是 13 周加 1 天。

结果

共有 28741 名妇女要求堕胎,其中 972 人(3.4%)超出法律限制就诊;这些妇女中有 29%由于强制性的 6 天等待期而无法获得堕胎服务。与在法律限制内就诊相比,超出法律限制就诊的特征为:年龄小于 20 岁(优势比,1.7),而不是 20-24 岁;接受小学、初中、高中或特殊教育,而不是高等教育(1.8-3.1);失业,而不是就业(1.3);拥有比利时国籍,而不是外国国籍(0.8)。有人陪伴前往 LUNA 中心(0.8)、不定期(0.6)或定期使用避孕药具(0.7)、曾经堕胎(0.8)与超出法律限制就诊相关,而不是在法律限制内就诊。

结论

在评估比利时堕胎政策时,需要更全面地考虑患者的特征,以确保社会经济弱势妇女的需求和权利得到满足。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of Women Who Present for Abortion Beyond the Legal Limit in Flanders, Belgium.在比利时佛兰德斯,寻求超出法律限制的堕胎女性的特征。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Sep;51(3):175-183. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12116. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
2
Characteristics of women who present for abortion towards the end of the mid-trimester in Scotland: national audit 2013-2014.2013 - 2014年苏格兰孕中期晚期进行堕胎的女性特征:全国审计
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(2):183-8. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1111326. Epub 2015 Nov 15.
3
Utah's 72-Hour Waiting Period for Abortion: Experiences Among a Clinic-Based Sample of Women.犹他州堕胎72小时等待期:基于诊所样本的女性经历
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Dec;48(4):179-187. doi: 10.1363/48e8216. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
4
Experiences of women who travel to England for abortions: an exploratory pilot study.前往英国进行堕胎手术的女性经历:一项探索性试点研究。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Oct;21(5):401-7. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1217325. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
5
Change in Second-Trimester Abortion After Implementation of a Restrictive State Law.限制州法律实施后,妊娠中期堕胎的变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):771-779. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003183.
6
Characteristics and Circumstances of U.S. Women Who Obtain Very Early and Second-Trimester Abortions.接受极早期及孕中期堕胎的美国女性的特征与情况。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 25;12(1):e0169969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169969. eCollection 2017.
7
[Consequences on women and their health of the possible reform of the abortion law].[堕胎法可能改革对女性及其健康的影响]
Gac Sanit. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):498-500. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
8
Perceived stress and emotional social support among women who are denied or receive abortions in the United States: a prospective cohort study.在美国被拒绝或接受堕胎的女性中感知到的压力和情绪社会支持:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Jun 19;14:76. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-76.
9
[Abortion and women's health].[堕胎与女性健康]
Gac Sanit. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):496-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
10
Obstacles and opportunities: a qualitative study of the experiences of abortion centre staff with abortion care during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Flanders, Belgium.障碍与机遇:比利时佛兰德斯地区首次封锁期间人工流产中心工作人员提供流产护理服务的经验定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1921901. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1921901.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstetricians' views on extending the 12-week abortion limit in Belgium: A qualitative study.比利时产科医生对延长12周堕胎期限的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0325434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325434. eCollection 2025.
2
Expanding access to safe ambulatory manual vacuum aspiration abortion up to 14+6 weeks following Argentina's legal reform: an observational study in the public health sector.阿根廷法律改革后扩大安全的门诊手动真空吸引术堕胎服务至孕14 + 6周:公共卫生部门的一项观察性研究
Reprod Health. 2025 May 24;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02036-8.
3
The impact of gestational age limits on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.
孕周限制对堕胎相关结果的影响:法律与健康证据的综合分析
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Feb 3;3(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00124-2.
4
A global scoping review of the circumstances of care seeking for abortion later in pregnancy.对妊娠晚期寻求堕胎护理情况的全球范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;4(12):e0003965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003965. eCollection 2024.
5
Abortion Trajectory, Timing, and Access Study (ATTAS): study protocol.堕胎轨迹、时机与可及性研究(ATTAS):研究方案
Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 13;82(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01418-x.
6
Delays in obtaining hospital care and abortion-related complications within a context of illegality.在非法背景下,医院护理和堕胎相关并发症的延误。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0286982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286982. eCollection 2023.
7
Abortion care in a pandemic: an analysis of the number and social profile of people requesting and receiving abortion care during the first COVID-19 lockdown (March 16 to June 14, 2020) in Flanders, Belgium.疫情期间的堕胎护理:对比利时弗拉芒地区在首次新冠疫情封锁期间(2020年3月16日至6月14日)请求并接受堕胎护理的人数及社会概况的分析。
Arch Public Health. 2021 Aug 4;79(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00665-6.
8
Abortion at the edges: Politics, practices, performances.边缘堕胎:政治、实践与表现
Womens Stud Int Forum. 2020 May-Jun;80:102372. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2020.102372. Epub 2020 Apr 28.