PhD Candidate, Department of Sociology, Centre for Population, Family and Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Correspondence:
Full Professor, Department of Sociology, Centre for Population, Family and Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1921901. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1921901.
The COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding measures impacted the organisation of services for abortion on request in Flanders, Belgium. This study describes abortion centre staff's perceptions of the influence of protective measures on abortion consultations and procedures, and aims to identify obstacles and opportunities that arose from this situation. Through the anonymised patient records of one Flemish abortion centre, we compared the number of requests and abortions during the first lockdown (16 March-14 June 2020) with the same period in the five preceding years. Using a phenomenological approach, we documented the procedures and conducted interviews (all inductively coded in Nvivo) with the centre's coordinator, seven psychosocial staff members and three doctors. Though fewer people requested and had an abortion, the pressure on the staff was high due to changed procedures. A substantial change was the substitution of telephone for in-person consultations, which the staff perceived as less suited for discussing worries, contraception counselling, and building trust. The centre remained accessible, but the staff perceived an influence on the emotional reactions of clients. Staff agreed that the lockdown did not negatively influence the abortion procedure itself. However, they felt a negative influence on the level of psychological support they could offer, especially in interactions with clients who were less certain of their choice and clients with whom there was no common language. When the lockdown was relaxed, a triage system was set up to ensure emotionally safe abortion care - as perceived by staff - for all clients.
COVID-19 大流行及相应措施对比利时佛兰德地区的人工流产服务组织产生了影响。本研究描述了人工流产中心工作人员对保护措施对堕胎咨询和程序的影响的看法,并旨在确定由此产生的障碍和机会。通过一个佛兰德人工流产中心的匿名患者记录,我们比较了第一次封锁期间(2020 年 3 月 16 日至 6 月 14 日)与前五年同期的堕胎请求和堕胎数量。使用现象学方法,我们记录了程序,并对该中心的协调员、七名社会心理工作人员和三名医生进行了采访(均在 Nvivo 中进行归纳编码)。尽管请求和堕胎的人数较少,但由于程序的改变,工作人员的压力很大。一个重大的变化是电话咨询代替了面对面咨询,工作人员认为后者不太适合讨论担忧、避孕咨询和建立信任。该中心仍然可以进入,但工作人员认为客户的情绪反应受到了影响。工作人员一致认为封锁并没有对堕胎程序本身产生负面影响。然而,他们感到自己提供的心理支持水平受到了负面影响,尤其是在与对自己的选择不太确定的客户以及与客户没有共同语言的客户的互动中。封锁放宽后,建立了一个分诊系统,以确保所有客户都能获得工作人员认为情绪安全的堕胎护理。