Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Warsaw, Poland (Laboratory of Food and Nutrition Hygiene).
Military Research and Development Center, Warsaw, Poland (Laboratory of Food Research).
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019 Oct 16;32(5):645-652. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01382. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Individual protection against contamination is the kind of protection provided to persons in an environment contaminated with radioactive substances, and war toxic or biological agents, including the use of gas masks, and insulating or filtration skin protection agents. The aim of this work was to perform a comparative assessment of energy expenditure of chemical troop soldiers wearing L-2 insulating personal protective clothes (PPC) and FOO-1 filter-sorptive PPC during training in the training ground conditions. Surveys on the subjective assessment of comfort related to using the L-2 and FOO-1 PPC were carried out as well.
A total of 29 men doing the same training tasks, wearing the L-2 PPC and FOO-1 filter-sorptive protective clothing with an MP-5 filter gas mask, underwent the examination. Measurements of energy expenditure values were done based on the frequency of heart contractions, recorded by the Polar Sport Tester 810 heart rate monitor.
It was found that an average energy expenditure of soldiers, resulting from performing training tasks, was lower among the subjects wearing the FOO- 1 filter-sorptive PPC, compared to the energy load of the ones using the L-2 PPC.
According to Christensen's classification of work severity, the average energy expenditure makes it possible to qualify works performed by soldiers using both types of PPC to moderate work. In the opinion of the examined soldiers serving in the chemical troops, the FOO-1 filter-sorptive PPC increases the sense of security while on a threatened ground. The FOO-1 filter-sorptive PPC is assessed by chemical troop soldiers as better because it hinders tasks fulfillment to a lesser extent. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019;32(5):645-52.
个体防护是针对人员所处的被放射性物质、战争毒剂或生物制剂污染的环境所提供的防护,包括使用防毒面具和隔热或过滤皮肤防护剂。本工作的目的是比较在训练场地条件下,穿着 L-2 隔热个人防护服(PPC)和 FOO-1 过滤吸附 PPC 的化学兵部队士兵的能量消耗。还进行了穿着 L-2 和 FOO-1 PPC 时舒适性相关的主观评估调查。
共 29 名男性在穿着 L-2 PPC 和 FOO-1 过滤吸附防护服并佩戴 MP-5 过滤式防毒面具进行相同的训练任务时接受了检查。能量消耗值的测量是基于 Polar Sport Tester 810 心率监测器记录的心跳频率得出的。
发现与穿着 L-2 PPC 的士兵相比,穿着 FOO-1 过滤吸附防护服的士兵执行训练任务时的平均能量消耗较低。
根据 Christensen 工作强度分类,平均能量消耗可将士兵使用两种类型的 PPC 执行的工作定性为中等强度的工作。在化学兵部队服役的被检查士兵认为,在受威胁的地面上,FOO-1 过滤吸附防护服增加了安全感。化学兵部队的士兵评估 FOO-1 过滤吸附防护服更好,因为它在一定程度上阻碍任务完成的程度较小。国际职业医学与环境卫生杂志。2019;32(5):645-52。