Suppr超能文献

评价解剖单束前交叉韧带重建后胫骨隧道位置的准确性。

Evaluating the Accuracy of Tibial Tunnel Placement After Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3187-3194. doi: 10.1177/0363546519873633. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction improves knee kinematics and joint stability in symptomatic patients who have ACL deficiency. Despite a concerted effort to place the graft within the ACL's native attachment sites, the accuracy of tunnel placement using contemporary techniques is not well established.

PURPOSE

To use 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D MRI) to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of tibial tunnel placement after anatomic ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Forty patients with symptomatic, ACL-deficient knees were prospectively enrolled in the study and underwent 3D MRI of both their injured and uninjured knees before and after surgery through use of a validated imaging protocol. The root ligament of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus was used as a radiographic reference, and the center of the reconstructed graft was compared with that of the contralateral normal knee. The tunnel angles and intra-articular graft angles were also measured, as was the percentage overlap between the native tibial footprint and tibial tunnel.

RESULTS

The reconstructed tibial footprint was placed at a mean ± SD of 2.14 ± 2.45 mm ( < .001) medial and 5.11 ± 3.57 mm ( < .001) posterior to the native ACL footprint. The mean distance between the center of the native and reconstructed ACL at the tibial attachment site was 6.24 mm. Of the 40 patients, 18 patients had a tibial tunnel that overlapped more than 50% of the native footprint, and 10 patients had maximal (100%) overlap. Further, 22 of the 40 patients had less than 50% overlap with the native footprint, and in 12 patients the footprint was missing completely.

CONCLUSION

Despite the use of contemporary surgical techniques to perform anatomic ACL reconstruction, a significant positioning error in tibial tunnel placement remains.

摘要

背景

解剖学前交叉韧带(ACL)重建可改善 ACL 缺失的有症状患者的膝关节运动学和关节稳定性。尽管人们一致努力将移植物放置在 ACL 的固有附着部位内,但使用现代技术放置隧道的准确性尚未得到很好的确定。

目的

使用三维磁共振成像(3D MRI)前瞻性评估解剖学 ACL 重建后胫骨隧道位置的准确性。

研究设计

病例系列;证据水平,4 级。

方法

前瞻性纳入 40 例 ACL 缺陷膝关节有症状的患者,并使用经过验证的成像方案,在术前和术后通过使用 3D MRI 对其患侧和健侧膝关节进行检查。前外侧半月板前角的韧带根被用作放射学参考,并且比较了重建移植物的中心与对侧正常膝关节的中心。还测量了隧道角度和关节内移植物角度,以及胫骨固有附着部位和胫骨隧道之间的重叠百分比。

结果

重建的胫骨附着点的位置平均为(2.14 ± 2.45)mm(<.001)内侧和(5.11 ± 3.57)mm(<.001)后,与 ACL 的固有附着点相比。在胫骨附着处,中心的距离为 6.24mm。在 40 例患者中,有 18 例胫骨隧道与固有胫骨附着点重叠超过 50%,10 例患者最大(100%)重叠。此外,40 例患者中有 22 例与固有胫骨附着点的重叠小于 50%,12 例患者完全缺失。

结论

尽管使用了现代手术技术进行解剖学 ACL 重建,但胫骨隧道位置的定位误差仍然很大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验