Si Jing, Yang Benlong, Guo Rong, Huang Naisi, Quan Chenlian, Ma Linxiaoxi, Xiu Bingqiu, Cao Yun, Tang Yue, Shen Linxiao, Chen Jiajian, Wu Jiong
Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, China.
Cancer Biol Med. 2019 May;16(2):312-318. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0159.
Patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma (DCIS) by core needle biopsy (CNB) exhibit a significant risk for upstaging on final pathology, which leads to major concerns of whether axillary staging is required at the primary operation. The present study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors associated with upstaging in patients preoperatively diagnosed with DCIS by CNB.
The present study enrolled 604 patients (cN0M0) with a preoperative diagnosis of pure DCIS by CNB, who underwent axillary staging between August 2006 and December 2015, at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (Shanghai, China). Predictive factors of upstaging were analyzed retrospectively.
Of the 604 patients, 20.03% ( = 121) and 31.95% ( = 193) were upstaged to DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) and invasive breast cancer (IBC) on final pathology, respectively. Larger tumor size on ultrasonography (> 2 cm) was independently associated with upstaging [odds ratio (OR) 1.558, = 0.014]. Additionally, patients in lower breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) categories were less likely to be upstaged (4B . 5: OR 0.435, = 0.002; 4C . 5: OR 0.502, = 0.001). Overall, axillary metastasis occurred in 6.79% ( = 41) of patients. Among patients with axillary metastasis, 1.38% (4/290), 3.31% (4/121) and 17.10% (33/193) were in the DCIS, DCISM, and IBC groups, respectively.
For patients initially diagnosed with DCIS by CNB, larger tumor size on ultrasonography (> 2 cm) and higher BI-RADS category were independent predictive factors of upstaging on final pathology. Thus, axillary staging in patients with smaller tumor sizes and lower BI-RADS category may be omitted, with little downstream risk for upstaging.
经粗针穿刺活检(CNB)术前诊断为导管原位癌(DCIS)的患者,最终病理分期上调的风险显著,这引发了对于在初次手术时是否需要进行腋窝分期的重大担忧。本研究旨在确定经CNB术前诊断为DCIS的患者中与分期上调相关的临床病理因素。
本研究纳入了604例术前经CNB诊断为纯DCIS的患者(cN0M0),这些患者于2006年8月至2015年12月在复旦大学附属肿瘤医院(中国上海)接受了腋窝分期。对分期上调的预测因素进行了回顾性分析。
在604例患者中,最终病理分别有20.03%(n = 121)和31.95%(n = 193)上调为伴有微浸润的DCIS(DCISM)和浸润性乳腺癌(IBC)。超声检查显示肿瘤较大(> 2 cm)与分期上调独立相关[比值比(OR)1.558,P = 0.014]。此外,乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类较低的患者分期上调的可能性较小(4B比5:OR 0.435,P = 0.002;4C比5:OR 0.502,P = 0.001)。总体而言,6.79%(n = 41)的患者发生了腋窝转移。在发生腋窝转移的患者中,DCIS、DCISM和IBC组分别为1.38%(4/290)、3.31%(4/121)和17.10%(33/193)。
对于最初经CNB诊断为DCIS的患者,超声检查显示肿瘤较大(> 2 cm)和较高的BI-RADS分类是最终病理分期上调的独立预测因素。因此,对于肿瘤较小且BI-RADS分类较低的患者,可省略腋窝分期,分期上调的下游风险较小。