SimTigrate Design Lab, Georgia State University, and College of Design.
School of Psychology, Georgia State University, and Georgia Institute of Technology.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(Suppl 3):S241-S247. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz617.
Few data exist to guide the physical design of biocontainment units, particularly the doffing area. This can impact the contamination risk of healthcare workers (HCWs) during doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE).
In phase I of our study, we analyzed simulations of a standard patient care task with 56 trained HCWs focusing on doffing of high-level PPE. In phase II, using a rapid cycle improvement approach, we tested different balance aids and redesigned doffing area layouts with 38 students. In phase III, we tested 1 redesigned layout with an additional 10 trained HCWs. We assessed the effectiveness of design changes on improving the HCW performance (measured by occurrence and number of risky behaviors) and reducing the physical and cognitive load by comparing the results from phase I and phase III.
The physical load was highest when participants were removing their shoe covers without any balance aid; the use of a chair required the lowest physical effort, followed by horizontal and vertical grab bars. In the revised design (phase III), the overall performance of participants improved. There was a significant decrease in the number of HCW risky behaviors (P = .004); 5 risky behaviors were eliminated and 2 others increased. There was a significant decrease in physical load when removing disposable shoe covers (P = .04), and participants reported a similar workload in the redesigned doffing layout (P = .43).
Through optimizing the design and layout of the doffing space, we reduced risky behaviors of HCWs during doffing of high-level PPE.
几乎没有数据可以指导生物隔离单元的物理设计,尤其是脱卸区。这可能会影响医护人员(HCW)在脱下个人防护设备(PPE)时的污染风险。
在我们研究的第一阶段,我们分析了 56 名经过培训的 HCW 进行标准患者护理任务的模拟,重点是高级别 PPE 的脱卸。在第二阶段,我们使用快速循环改进方法,用 38 名学生测试了不同的平衡辅助工具和重新设计的脱卸区布局。在第三阶段,我们用另外 10 名经过培训的 HCW 测试了重新设计的 1 个布局。我们通过比较第一阶段和第三阶段的结果,评估设计变更在提高 HCW 表现(通过出现和危险行为的数量来衡量)和降低身体和认知负荷方面的效果。
参与者在没有任何平衡辅助工具的情况下脱下鞋套时,身体负荷最高;使用椅子需要的体力最小,其次是水平和垂直抓杆。在修订后的设计(第三阶段)中,参与者的整体表现有所提高。HCW 危险行为的数量显著减少(P =.004);消除了 5 种危险行为,另外 2 种增加。当脱下一次性鞋套时,身体负荷显著降低(P =.04),参与者报告在重新设计的脱卸布局中工作量相似(P =.43)。
通过优化脱卸空间的设计和布局,我们减少了 HCW 在脱下高级别 PPE 时的危险行为。