Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Dec;28(12):2030-2037. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1210. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
There is currently no optimal sampling method for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract microbiota. We compared biopsies and mucosal swab specimens for microbial sampling from patients with UGI carcinoma.
A total of 67 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and 36 patients with gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) were recruited in the Linxian Cancer Hospital (Henan, China). Sterile biopsies and swabs were used to collect paired samples from the resection specimens from carcinoma and adjacent normal tissue. Data from 16S rRNA gene sequencing were processed using QIIME2 to evaluate differences in alpha and beta diversity and taxonomic relative abundances between specimen types.
Alpha diversity was not significantly different between swab specimens and biopsies, both for ESCC and GCA. Paired specimens were correlated for both sample types from ESCC ( > 0.6, < 0.001) but not GCA ( < 0.4, > 0.05). For beta diversity, distinct clustering by sampling method was not observed for adjacent normal or tumor tissue from ESCC or GCA. There was a high correlation for weighted UniFrac and Bray-Curtis distance only in ESCC paired specimens ( > 0.6, = 0.001). The 10 dominant bacterial genera were similar between swab and biopsy specimens. However, higher levels of ( = 0.0002) and ( = 0.0002) were detected in ESCC adjacent normal and GCA carcinoma swabs, respectively, compared with the biopsies.
Mucosal swab specimens and biopsies could yield similar microbial profiles from ESCC but not GCA. Both can be used to characterize UGI microbiota; one sampling method should be selected for future studies.
This study provides insight for planning microbiota collections from the UGI tract.
目前,上消化道(UGI)微生物群的最佳采样方法尚不存在。我们比较了有 UGI 癌患者的活检和黏膜拭子标本的微生物采样。
共招募了 67 例食管鳞癌(ESCC)和 36 例贲门腺癌(GCA)患者,来自中国河南林县癌症医院。使用无菌活检和拭子从癌组织和相邻正常组织的切除标本中采集配对样本。使用 QIIME2 对 16S rRNA 基因测序数据进行处理,以评估标本类型之间的 alpha 和 beta 多样性以及分类相对丰度的差异。
ESCC 和 GCA 患者的拭子标本和活检标本的 alpha 多样性无显著差异。两种样本类型的配对标本均呈正相关(>0.6,<0.001),但 GCA 则无相关性(<0.4,>0.05)。对于 beta 多样性,ESCC 和 GCA 的相邻正常组织和肿瘤组织的采样方法无明显聚类。仅在 ESCC 配对标本中,加权 UniFrac 和 Bray-Curtis 距离有高度相关性(>0.6,=0.001)。拭子和活检标本的 10 个主要细菌属相似。然而,与活检相比,ESCC 相邻正常组织和 GCA 癌组织拭子中 (=0.0002)和 (=0.0002)的水平分别更高。
黏膜拭子标本和活检标本可从 ESCC 中获得相似的微生物谱,但不能从 GCA 中获得。两种方法均可用于表征 UGI 微生物群;应选择一种采样方法用于未来的研究。
本研究为规划 UGI 微生物组的采集提供了参考。