European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention, Brussels, Belgium.
Laboratory of Toxicology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.
Tob Control. 2020 Sep;29(5):531-536. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055061. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
To evaluate electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) product compliance with European regulations (Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), Implementing Decisions), with a focus on labelling/packaging practices and technical design/safety features.
Before the implementation of the TPD, in early 2016, we randomly selected e-cigarette refill liquids from the five top-selling companies in France, Poland, Germany, Netherlands, UK, Spain, Romania, Hungary and Greece. Identical products were purchased after the implementation of the TPD (early 2018) and assessment of compliance was performed on self-matched samples (n=107) using a prospective cohort design. Compliance with the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) regulations was also evaluated.
Following the implementation of the TPD, improvements were noted with regards to the existence of text-only warnings (32.7% pre vs 86.0% post, p<0.001), child-resistant fastenings (93.3% pre vs 100.0% post, p=0.016), tamper-proof vials (58.9% pre vs 86.9%, post p<0.001) and maximum refill volume ≤10 mL in vials (86.9% pre vs 94.4% post, p=0.008). Lower compliance was noted with regards to the inclusion of a leaflet (26.2% pre vs 53.3% post, p<0.001), refilling instructions (28.0% pre vs 51.4% post, p<0.001) and health warnings on the box, vial or leaflet (32.7% pre vs 86.0%, p<0.001). Overall, 86.0% of products had a warning label in the post-TPD phase in comparison to 32.7% of products before the implementation of the TPD (p<0.001). Compliance with the CLP regulations, also increased in the post TPD follow-up phase.
This is the first study to evaluate the level of implementation of the e-cigarette regulations in nine EU member states. Our results indicate that refill liquids had substantial but not full compliance in most of the characteristics evaluated. Further effort is needed to ensure complete compliance.
评估电子烟(e-cigarette)产品是否符合欧洲法规(烟草制品指令(TPD),实施决定),重点是标签/包装做法和技术设计/安全特性。
在 TPD 实施之前(2016 年初),我们从法国、波兰、德国、荷兰、英国、西班牙、罗马尼亚、匈牙利和希腊的五家销量最高的公司中随机抽取电子烟补充液。TPD 实施后(2018 年初),购买了相同的产品,并使用前瞻性队列设计对自我匹配的样本(n=107)进行合规性评估。还评估了分类、标签和包装(CLP)法规的遵守情况。
在 TPD 实施后,在以下方面观察到了改进:存在仅文本警告(32.7%之前 vs 86.0%之后,p<0.001)、儿童安全扣(93.3%之前 vs 100.0%之后,p=0.016)、防篡改小瓶(58.9%之前 vs 86.9%之后,p<0.001)和小瓶中最大填充量≤10 毫升(86.9%之前 vs 94.4%之后,p=0.008)。在包含传单(26.2%之前 vs 53.3%之后,p<0.001)、再填充说明(28.0%之前 vs 51.4%之后,p<0.001)和盒、小瓶或传单上的健康警告(32.7%之前 vs 86.0%,p<0.001)方面,合规性较低。总体而言,与 TPD 实施前的 32.7%相比,在 TPD 后阶段有 86.0%的产品具有警告标签(p<0.001)。CLP 法规的合规性在 TPD 后随访阶段也有所提高。
这是第一项评估 9 个欧盟成员国电子烟法规实施水平的研究。我们的结果表明,在评估的大多数特征中,补充液在很大程度上但并非完全符合规定。需要进一步努力以确保完全合规。