• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生首发心境障碍患者 7 天共决治疗:一项随机对照试验

Seven-day shared decision making for outpatients with first episode of mood disorders among university students: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, St. Luke's International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.

Department of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2019 Nov;281:112531. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112531. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112531
PMID:31521046
Abstract

Providing appropriate treatment to patients with a first episode of mood disorders is crucial for recovery from the disorders. Although shared decision making (SDM) has been proposed as a promising model in psychiatric practice, an appropriate SDM approach has not yet been established. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of an originally developed seven-day SDM program for outpatients with a first episode of mood disorders among university students. University students with a first episode of mood disorders were randomly allocated into two arms: SDM and control. The participants in the SDM arm received the seven-day SDM program, which included option presentation consultation, external deliberation with a decision aid booklet, decision coaching by a nurse, and decision-making consultation. The control arm received usual care. The primary outcome was patient-perceived involvement. We enrolled 88 participants. Compared with usual care, the SDM program significantly improved patient-perceived involvement in treatment decision making without taking up clinicians' time. The program did not lead to worse symptoms of mood disorders. In conclusion, sharing treatment decision making with university students with a first episode of mood disorders is feasible.

摘要

为首次发作心境障碍的患者提供适当的治疗对于其疾病康复至关重要。尽管共享决策(SDM)已被提议作为精神科实践中的一种有前途的模式,但尚未建立适当的 SDM 方法。本研究的目的是评估为大学生首发心境障碍患者开发的为期七天的 SDM 方案对门诊患者的影响。首发心境障碍的大学生被随机分配到 SDM 和对照组两个组。SDM 组的参与者接受了为期七天的 SDM 方案,其中包括选择呈现咨询、使用决策辅助手册进行外部协商、由护士进行决策指导以及决策咨询。对照组接受常规护理。主要结局是患者感知的参与度。我们共纳入了 88 名参与者。与常规护理相比,SDM 方案在不占用临床医生时间的情况下,显著提高了患者对治疗决策的感知参与度,且不会导致心境障碍症状恶化。总之,与首发心境障碍的大学生共享治疗决策是可行的。

相似文献

1
Seven-day shared decision making for outpatients with first episode of mood disorders among university students: A randomized controlled trial.大学生首发心境障碍患者 7 天共决治疗:一项随机对照试验
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Nov;281:112531. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112531. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
2
The Momentum trial: the efficacy of using a smartphone application to promote patient activation and support shared decision making in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in outpatient treatment settings: a randomized controlled single-blind trial.动力试验:使用智能手机应用程序促进门诊治疗环境中诊断为精神分裂症患者的患者激活和支持共享决策的效果:一项随机对照单盲试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2143-2.
3
Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on shared decision-making regarding treatment decisions for depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in specialized psychiatric care.患者和临床医生对精神科专科治疗抑郁、焦虑障碍和强迫症的治疗决策共享决策的看法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):645-658. doi: 10.1111/jep.13285. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
4
Shared decision-making in outpatients with mental disorders: Patients´ preferences and associated factors.门诊精神障碍患者的共同决策:患者的偏好和相关因素。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1200-1209. doi: 10.1111/jep.13246. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
5
Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders.共享决策:一项关注心境障碍的系统评价。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Mar 27;20(4):23. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0892-0.
6
Shared decision-making in general practice: an observational study comparing 2007 with 2015.全科医学中的共同决策:一项比较 2007 年和 2015 年的观察性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 May 23;36(3):357-364. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy070.
7
Shared decision-making support program for older patients with advanced cancer using a question prompt list and geriatric assessment: A pilot randomized controlled trial.使用问题提示清单和老年评估为晚期癌症老年患者提供共同决策支持计划:一项试点随机对照试验。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Jun;15(5):101778. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101778. Epub 2024 May 4.
8
The impact of patient narratives on medical students' perceptions of shared decision making: A randomized controlled trial.患者叙述对医学生共享决策认知的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1886642. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1886642.
9
Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.实现参与:一项关于全科医疗中共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验的过程结果
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):337-46. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh401.
10
Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study.在一项关于其有效性的实用随机试验中,使一种促进心房颤动患者抗凝治疗共同决策的对话工具正常化:一项横断面研究。
Trials. 2020 May 12;21(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04305-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse-Led Mental Health Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review.由护士主导的大学生心理健康干预措施:一项系统综述。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 May 1;22:E17. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.240200.
2
Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:对精神疾病患者结局证据的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70134. doi: 10.1111/hex.70134.
3
Youth Perspectives on 'Highly Personalised and Measurement-Based Care': Qualitative Co-Design of Education Materials.
青年视角下的“高度个性化和基于测量的医疗照护”:教育材料的定性协同设计。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14137. doi: 10.1111/hex.14137.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
5
Comparison of analog and digital patient decision aids for the treatment of depression: a scoping review.用于抑郁症治疗的模拟和数字患者决策辅助工具的比较:一项范围综述
Front Digit Health. 2023 Sep 1;5:1208889. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1208889. eCollection 2023.
6
Development and acceptability of a decision aid for anxiety disorder considering discontinuation of benzodiazepine anxiolytic.一种考虑停用苯二氮䓬类抗焦虑药的焦虑症决策辅助工具的开发与可接受性
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 12;14:1083568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1083568. eCollection 2023.
7
How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods.我们如何才能最好地让年轻人参与到他们的健康决策中来?有针对性的优先决策方法的范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jan 25;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01794-2.
8
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
9
Implementation of a shared decision-making training program for clinicians based on the major depressive disorder guidelines in Japan: A multi-center cluster randomized trial.基于日本重度抑郁症指南为临床医生实施的共同决策培训项目:一项多中心整群随机试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 12;13:967750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.967750. eCollection 2022.
10
Development and acceptability of a decision aid for major depressive disorder considering discontinuation of antidepressant treatment after remission.考虑到缓解后抗抑郁治疗的停药,开发并评估了一种用于治疗重度抑郁症的决策辅助工具的适用性。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2022 Sep;42(3):306-314. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12269. Epub 2022 Jul 1.