• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青年视角下的“高度个性化和基于测量的医疗照护”:教育材料的定性协同设计。

Youth Perspectives on 'Highly Personalised and Measurement-Based Care': Qualitative Co-Design of Education Materials.

机构信息

The Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14137. doi: 10.1111/hex.14137.

DOI:10.1111/hex.14137
PMID:38976368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11229696/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite high levels of mental ill-health amongst young people (aged 15-30), this group demonstrates low help-seeking and high drop-out from mental health services (MHS). Whilst shared decision-making can assist people in receiving appropriate and effective health care, young people frequently report that they do not feel involved in treatment decisions. The current study focused on co-design of a clinical education and participant information programme for the Brain and Mind Centre Youth Model of Care. This model, which articulates a youth-focused form of highly personalised and measurement-based care, is designed to promote shared decision-making between young people and clinical service providers.

METHODS

We conducted workshops with 24 young people (16-31; M = 21.5) who had accessed mental health services. Participants were asked what advice they would give to young people entering services, before giving advice on existing materials. Workshops were conducted and transcripts were coded using thematic analysis by two lived experience researchers and a clinical researcher.

RESULTS

Young people found it empowering to be educated on transdiagnostic models of mental illness, namely clinical staging, which gives them a better understanding of why certain treatments may be inappropriate and ineffective, and thus reduce self-blame. Similarly, young people had limited knowledge of links between mental health and other life domains and found it helpful to be educated on multidisciplinary treatment options. Measurement-based care was seen as an important method of improving shared decision-making between young people and health professionals; however, to facilitate shared decision-making, young people also wanted better information on their rights in care and more support to share their expertise in their own needs, values and treatment preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings will inform the delivery of the further development and implementation of a youth-specific clinical education and participant information programme for the BMC Youth Model.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Workshops were facilitated by researchers with lived expertise in mental ill-health (A.H. and/or C.G.) and a clinical researcher (who has expertise as an academic and a clinical psychologist). A.H. and C.G. were also involved in conceptualisation, analysis, interpretation, review and editing of this paper.

摘要

目的

尽管年轻人(15-30 岁)的心理健康问题严重,但这一群体寻求心理健康服务的帮助较少,且中途退出服务的情况较多。虽然共同决策可以帮助人们获得适当和有效的医疗保健,但年轻人经常报告说,他们觉得自己没有参与治疗决策。本研究专注于为脑与心智中心青年照护模式共同设计临床教育和参与者信息方案。该模式阐述了一种以年轻人为中心的高度个性化和基于测量的护理形式,旨在促进年轻人与临床服务提供者之间的共同决策。

方法

我们与 24 名(16-31 岁;M=21.5)曾接受过心理健康服务的年轻人进行了研讨会。参与者在提供现有材料建议之前,被要求提供他们对进入服务的年轻人的建议。由两名具有实际经验的研究人员和一名临床研究人员对研讨会进行记录和编码分析。

结果

年轻人发现接受关于精神疾病的跨诊断模型(即临床分期)的教育是赋权的,这使他们更好地理解为什么某些治疗可能不适当和无效,从而减少自责。同样,年轻人对心理健康与其他生活领域之间的联系知之甚少,他们发现接受关于多学科治疗方案的教育很有帮助。基于测量的护理被视为改善年轻人和卫生专业人员之间共同决策的重要方法;然而,为了促进共同决策,年轻人还希望更好地了解他们在护理中的权利,并获得更多的支持,以分享他们在自己的需求、价值观和治疗偏好方面的专业知识。

结论

这些发现将为进一步开发和实施脑与心智中心青年照护模式的特定于青年的临床教育和参与者信息方案提供信息。

患者或公众贡献

研讨会由具有心理健康实际经验的研究人员(A.H. 和/或 C.G.)和临床研究人员(具有学术和临床心理学家的专业知识)共同主持。A.H. 和 C.G. 还参与了本文的概念化、分析、解释、审查和编辑。

相似文献

1
Youth Perspectives on 'Highly Personalised and Measurement-Based Care': Qualitative Co-Design of Education Materials.青年视角下的“高度个性化和基于测量的医疗照护”:教育材料的定性协同设计。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14137. doi: 10.1111/hex.14137.
2
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
3
Shared Decision Making in a Youth Mental Health Service Design and Research Project: Insights From the Pan-Canadian ACCESS Open Minds Network.在青少年心理健康服务设计和研究项目中进行共同决策:泛加ACCESS 开放思维网络的见解。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):653-666. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00444-5.
4
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
The CHOICE pilot project: Challenges of implementing a combined peer work and shared decision-making programme in an early intervention service.CHOICE试点项目:在早期干预服务中实施同伴工作与共同决策相结合项目的挑战
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;12(5):964-971. doi: 10.1111/eip.12527. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
6
Being in a space of sharing decision-making for dignified mental care.处于共享决策的空间,以实现有尊严的精神关怀。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):368-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12548. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
7
Facilitators and Barriers to Person-centred Care in Child and Young People Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review.促进和阻碍儿童和青少年心理健康服务中以患者为中心的护理的因素:系统评价。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Jul;24(4):870-886. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2052. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
8
Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis.促进囊性纤维化儿童和青少年参与共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 23;5(5):CD012578. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012578.pub2.
9
An Application of Evidence-Based Approaches to Engage Young People in the Design of a Global Mental Health Databank.循证方法在全球精神卫生数据库设计中吸引年轻人参与的应用。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e14172. doi: 10.1111/hex.14172.
10
Making decisions about treatment for young people diagnosed with depressive disorders: a qualitative study of clinicians' experiences.针对被诊断患有抑郁障碍的年轻人的治疗决策:临床医生经验的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Dec 12;13:335. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-335.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Youth Perspectives on Digital Mental Health Platforms: Qualitative Descriptive Study.探索青少年对数字心理健康平台的看法:定性描述性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 29;12:e69907. doi: 10.2196/69907.
2
Enhancing Research Involvement of Young People With Lived Expertise: Reflecting on Experiences in Digital Mental Health Research.增强具有实践经验的年轻人的研究参与度:反思数字心理健康研究中的经验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 18;26:e55441. doi: 10.2196/55441.

本文引用的文献

1
The Polarization of Clinician and Service Staff Perspectives After the Use of Health Information Technology in Youth Mental Health Services: Implementation and Evaluation Study.青少年心理健康服务中使用健康信息技术后临床医生与服务人员观点的两极分化:实施与评估研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jul 25;10:e42993. doi: 10.2196/42993.
2
Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and Feedback: Research Review and Recommendations.常规结果监测(ROM)和反馈:研究综述与建议。
Psychother Res. 2023 Sep;33(7):841-855. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2023.2181114. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
Using Digital Technologies to Facilitate Care Coordination Between Youth Mental Health Services: A Guide for Implementation.利用数字技术促进青少年心理健康服务之间的护理协调:实施指南
Front Health Serv. 2021 Nov 18;1:745456. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2021.745456. eCollection 2021.
4
Co-design and evaluation of a multidisciplinary teaching resource on mental health recovery involving people with lived experience.多学科心理健康康复教学资源的共同设计与评估,涉及有过切身体验的人群。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2023 Jun;70(3):354-365. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12859. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
5
Embedding lived experience into mental health academic research organizations: Critical reflections.将生活体验嵌入心理健康学术研究组织:批判性反思。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2299-2305. doi: 10.1111/hex.13586. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
6
Professional Mental Health Help-Seeking Amongst Afghan and Iraqi Refugees in Australia: Understanding Predictors Five Years Post Resettlement.专业心理健康求助:澳大利亚阿富汗和伊拉克难民五年后重新安置的情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 8;19(3):1896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031896.
7
Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.全球、区域和国家 204 个地区 1990-2019 年 12 种精神障碍疾病的负担:基于 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
Informing the Future of Integrated Digital and Clinical Mental Health Care: Synthesis of the Outcomes From Project Synergy.为综合数字与临床心理健康护理的未来提供信息:协同项目成果综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Mar 9;9(3):e33060. doi: 10.2196/33060.
9
Social and occupational outcomes for young people who attend early intervention mental health services: a longitudinal study.参加早期心理健康干预服务的年轻人的社会和职业结果:一项纵向研究。
Med J Aust. 2022 Feb 7;216(2):87-93. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51308. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
10
Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies.全球精神障碍发病年龄:192 项流行病学研究的大规模荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):281-295. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7. Epub 2021 Jun 2.