Zhang Yuan Bo, Huang Zong Sheng, Chen Xuan, Guo Xiao Lan, Feng Wei Wei, Liu Yi Fu, Pang Min, Fang Yin
College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
College of Humanities and Physical Education, Guizhou Technology and Business Institute, Guiyang 551400, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Sep;30(9):3203-3214. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201909.015.
To investigate the traditional village living environment adaptability to desertification and topography, the suitability evaluation index system and weight of traditional Buyei traditional villages in the rocky desertification area human settlement were quantified using Delphi method and comprehensive weighting method. We calculated human settlements environment suitability value and threshold to comprehensively analyze the human settlements environment suitability. The results showed that 10% of the traditional Buyei traditional villages were located in the rocky desertification areas with high intensity and extremely high intensity and had the tradition of selecting the best environment. The index system of residential environment suitability was composed of five first-level indices (economy, historic culture, ecology, society, and building environment suitability) and 26 second-level indices. This index system was applicable to villages in karst regions. The comprehensive environmental suitability value (2.81-3.77), the economy value (0.77-1.17), the historic culture value (0.39-0.50), the ecology value (0.83-1.07), the social environment value (0.38-0.53) all decreased with the increasing intensity of rocky desertification, but the suitability value of building environment did not change, which ranged from 0.43 to 0.51. Rocky desertification had profound and synergistic impacts on economy, historic culture, ecology and social environment. The floor level of the human settlement suitability threshold was 2.93. If the threshold was lower than 2.93, it could be considered to move or take measures to improve its value. The suitability value (3.56) of traditional village living environment in mountain slope was higher than that in depression (3.42) and valley (3.16). The human settlement suitability of traditional villages in rocky desertification area was higher than that of ordinary villages, but was lower than that of normal landform, with the differences in economy and ecology being the main reasons. To improve the living environment of traditional villages in rocky desertification areas, we should strengthen the comprehensive control of rocky desertification and policy support, develop ecological economy and tourism, protect historic culture or choose ecological migration. This research could provide theoretical base for the planning and construction of village living environment protection in karst areas.
为探究传统村落居住环境对石漠化和地形的适应性,运用德尔菲法和综合加权法对喀斯特石漠化地区布依族传统村落人居环境适宜性评价指标体系及权重进行量化。计算人居环境适宜性值和阈值,以综合分析人居环境适宜性。结果表明,10%的布依族传统村落位于高强度和极高强度石漠化地区,且有择优选址的传统。居住环境适宜性指标体系由5个一级指标(经济、历史文化、生态、社会、建筑环境适宜性)和26个二级指标构成。该指标体系适用于喀斯特地区村落。综合环境适宜性值(2.81 - 3.77)、经济值(0.77 - 1.17)、历史文化值(0.39 - 0.50)、生态值(0.83 - 1.07)、社会环境值(0.38 - 0.53)均随石漠化强度增加而降低,但建筑环境适宜性值未变,其范围为0.43至0.51。石漠化对经济、历史文化、生态和社会环境有深刻且协同的影响。人居环境适宜性阈值底线为2.93。若阈值低于2.93,可考虑搬迁或采取措施提升其值。山坡传统村落居住环境适宜性值(3.56)高于洼地(3.42)和山谷(3.16)。石漠化地区传统村落人居适宜性高于普通村落,但低于正常地貌村落,经济和生态差异为主要原因。为改善石漠化地区传统村落居住环境,应加强石漠化综合防治与政策支持,发展生态经济和旅游业,保护历史文化或选择生态移民。本研究可为喀斯特地区村落居住环境保护规划与建设提供理论依据。