Wen Yiting, Cai Hong, Han Duo
College of Mining, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(9):13122-13140. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31934-w. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
The investigation of the temporal-spatial characteristics and driving factors of vegetation ecosystem (VE) alterations held significant practical implications for the evaluation of the efficacy of rocky desertification management initiatives and safeguarding the ecological environment in the rocky desertification restoration region of Guizhou. We computed the comprehensive ecological quality index (Q) of vegetation based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and net primary productivity (NPP). Combined with temperature, precipitation, sunshine duration, rocky desertification grade, land use, and the time series of various regions being included in national ecological functional zones, we analyzed the spatial-temporal distribution characteristics of VE changes and their response to climate change (CC) and ecological engineering (EE) by using partial derivative analysis method and scenario setting method in rocky desertification restoration areas in Guizhou. Results demonstrated that (1) the average values of NDVI, NPP, and Q all showed a fluctuating upward trend since 2000. Although the VE status of rocky desertification area was obviously worse than that of no rocky desertification area, it has a higher growth rate, especially the growth rates of NDVI, NPP, and Q in severe rocky desertification area were as high as 0.0050 year, 9.0733 g C m year, and 0.7829 year, and the area with high recovery degree accounted for 93.19%, followed by the middle rocky desertification area. (2) CC was the main driving factor for NDVI and Q recovery, and EE was the main driving factor for NPP recovery. The contribution of EE to NPP and Q recovery increased with the increase of rocky desertification, as high as 82.13% and 30.31% in severe rocky desertification area. (3) The more serious the rocky desertification was, the more dependent the vegetation restoration was on ecological engineering, and the more difficult the restoration was. It was urgent to solve the ecological environmental problems. (4) EE played a greater role in the restoration of VE in the early stage of implementation. Its role gradually decreased in the later stages of implementation, while the role of CC increased. We provide a scientific basis for the follow-up treatment of rocky desertification, ecological environment restoration, and ecological protection effectiveness evaluation in Guizhou.
对植被生态系统(VE)变化的时空特征及驱动因素进行研究,对于评估石漠化治理举措的成效以及保护贵州石漠化治理恢复区的生态环境具有重要的现实意义。我们基于归一化植被指数(NDVI)和净初级生产力(NPP)计算了植被的综合生态质量指数(Q)。结合温度、降水、日照时长、石漠化等级、土地利用以及各区域纳入国家生态功能区的时间序列,运用偏导数分析法和情景设定法,对贵州石漠化治理恢复区VE变化的时空分布特征及其对气候变化(CC)和生态工程(EE)的响应进行了分析。结果表明:(1)自2000年以来,NDVI、NPP和Q的平均值均呈波动上升趋势。虽然石漠化地区的植被生态状况明显劣于非石漠化地区,但其增长率较高,尤其是重度石漠化地区的NDVI、NPP和Q的增长率分别高达0.0050/年、9.0733 g C m²/年和0.7829/年,恢复程度高的区域占93.19%,其次是中度石漠化地区。(2)CC是NDVI和Q恢复主要驱动因素,EE是NPP恢复的主要驱动因素。EE对NPP和Q恢复的贡献率随着石漠化程度的加重而增加,在重度石漠化地区高达82.13%和30.31%。(3)石漠化越严重,植被恢复对生态工程的依赖程度越高,恢复难度越大。解决生态环境问题迫在眉睫。(4)EE在实施初期对VE恢复发挥的作用较大。在实施后期其作用逐渐减弱,而CC的作用增强。我们为贵州石漠化的后续治理、生态环境恢复及生态保护成效评估提供了科学依据。