• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善导管原位癌患者为中心的护理的建议:与女性进行定性焦点小组。

Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women.

机构信息

Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):106-114. doi: 10.1111/hex.12973. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12973
PMID:31532871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6978860/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-centred care (PCC) improves health-care experiences and outcomes. Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and clinicians have reported communication difficulties. Little prior research has studied how to improve communication and PCC for DCIS.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored how to achieve PCC for DCIS.

DESIGN

Canadian women treated for DCIS from five provinces participated in semi-structured focus groups based on a 6-domain cancer-specific PCC framework to discuss communication about DCIS. Data were analysed using constant comparative technique.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-five women aged 30 to 86 participated in five focus groups at five hospitals.

RESULTS

Women said their clinicians used multiple approaches for fostering a healing relationship; however, most described an absence of desired information or behaviour to exchange information, respond to emotions, manage uncertainty, make decisions and enable self-management. Most women were confused by terminology, offered little information about the risks of progression/recurrence, uninformed about treatment benefits and risks, frustrated with lack of engagement in decision making, given little information about follow-up plans or self-care advice, and received no acknowledgement or offer of emotional support.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

By comparing the accounts of women with DCIS to a PCC framework, we identified limitations and inconsistencies in women's lived experience of communication about DCIS, and approaches by which clinicians can more consistently achieve PCC for DCIS. Future research should develop and evaluate informational tools to support PCC for DCIS.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的护理(PCC)可改善医疗保健体验和结果。患有导管原位癌(DCIS)的女性和临床医生报告说存在沟通困难。先前很少有研究探讨如何改善 DCIS 的沟通和 PCC。

目的

本研究探讨了如何实现 DCIS 的 PCC。

设计

来自五个省份的接受 DCIS 治疗的加拿大女性参加了基于 6 个癌症特定 PCC 框架的半结构化焦点小组,讨论有关 DCIS 的沟通。使用恒比技术对数据进行分析。

地点和参与者

35 名年龄在 30 至 86 岁之间的女性参加了五个医院的五个焦点小组。

结果

女性表示,其临床医生采用了多种方法来建立治愈关系;然而,大多数人表示缺乏所需的信息或行为来交流信息、回应情绪、管理不确定性、做出决策和实现自我管理。大多数女性对术语感到困惑,很少提供有关进展/复发风险的信息,对治疗的益处和风险一无所知,对缺乏参与决策感到沮丧,很少提供有关随访计划或自我护理建议的信息,也没有得到任何情绪支持的认可或提议。

讨论和结论

通过将 DCIS 女性的描述与 PCC 框架进行比较,我们确定了女性对 DCIS 沟通的亲身体验中存在的局限性和不一致之处,以及临床医生可以更一致地实现 DCIS 的 PCC 的方法。未来的研究应开发和评估信息工具,以支持 DCIS 的 PCC。

相似文献

1
Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women.改善导管原位癌患者为中心的护理的建议:与女性进行定性焦点小组。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):106-114. doi: 10.1111/hex.12973. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
2
Identifying opportunities to support patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: qualitative interviews with clinicians.识别支持导管原位癌患者为中心的护理机会:对临床医生的定性访谈。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Apr 30;20(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06821-5.
3
National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ.关于导管原位癌患者为中心的护理的国家共识建议。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(3):561-570. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
"Well, have I got cancer or haven't I?" The psycho-social issues for women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.“嗯,我到底有没有患癌症?” 原位导管癌女性患者的心理社会问题。
Health Expect. 2002 Dec;5(4):310-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00199.x.
5
How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts women's concern and management preferences: A qualitative study.导管原位癌(DCIS)的不同术语如何影响女性的担忧及治疗偏好:一项定性研究。
Breast. 2015 Oct;24(5):673-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
6
Treatment decision-making in ductal carcinoma in situ: A mixed methods systematic review of women's experiences and information needs.导管原位癌的治疗决策:一项关于女性体验和信息需求的混合方法系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Sep;100(9):1654-1666. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 15.
7
A Patient-centered Approach to Evaluate the Information Needs of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.一种以患者为中心的方法来评估导管原位癌女性的信息需求。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;40(6):574-581. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000184.
8
Quality of DCIS information on the internet: a content analysis.互联网上 DCIS 信息的质量:一项内容分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Sep;177(2):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05315-8. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
9
Development and pilot testing of a communication aid to assist clinicians to communicate with women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).一种沟通辅助工具的开发和初步测试,以帮助临床医生与诊断为导管原位癌(DCIS)的女性进行沟通。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 May;19(5):717-23. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1040-5. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
10
Women's information needs about ductal carcinoma in situ before mammographic screening and after diagnosis: a qualitative study.乳腺钼靶筛查前及诊断后女性对导管原位癌的信息需求:一项定性研究
J Med Screen. 2006;13(3):110-4. doi: 10.1258/096914106778440581.

引用本文的文献

1
Labels, Language, and Other Strategies to Improve Communication About Lower Grade Forms of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A National Delphi Survey.标签、语言及其他改善乳腺导管原位癌低级别形式相关沟通的策略:一项全国性德尔菲调查
Int J Breast Cancer. 2025 Feb 17;2025:8642832. doi: 10.1155/ijbc/8642832. eCollection 2025.
2
Preferred labels and language to improve communication about lesions at low risk of progressing to cancer: qualitative interviews with patients and physicians.用于改善关于进展为癌症低风险病变的沟通的首选标签和语言:对患者和医生的定性访谈
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e087484. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087484.
3
Quality of life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.导管原位癌患者的生活质量问题:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 1;32(10):695. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08864-x.
4
Age and race/ethnicity differences in decisional conflict in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.原位导管癌女性患者决策冲突中的年龄及种族/民族差异。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Feb 4;24(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02935-1.
5
Women's views about current and future management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS): A mixed-methods study.女性对导管原位癌(DCIS)当前和未来管理的看法:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 21;18(7):e0288972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288972. eCollection 2023.
6
Prediction Models and Decision Aids for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Systematic Literature Review.导管原位癌女性的预测模型与决策辅助工具:一项系统文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 2;14(13):3259. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133259.
7
"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.“这是癌症吗?” 对导管原位癌诊断和治疗相关的幸存者关注点的定性探索。
Cancer. 2022 Apr 15;128(8):1676-1683. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34126. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
8
Overcoming Barriers in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Management: From Overtreatment to Optimal Treatment.克服导管原位癌治疗中的障碍:从过度治疗到优化治疗。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 20;40(3):225-230. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01674. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
9
Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study.医护专业人员对主动监测在导管原位癌(DCIS)管理中作用的看法:定性访谈研究。
Breast. 2020 Dec;54:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of DCIS information on the internet: a content analysis.互联网上 DCIS 信息的质量:一项内容分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Sep;177(2):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05315-8. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
2
National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ.关于导管原位癌患者为中心的护理的国家共识建议。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(3):561-570. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
3
Words do matter: a systematic review on how different terminology for the same condition influences management preferences.用词至关重要:关于同一病症的不同术语如何影响管理偏好的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):e014129. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014129.
4
How do the characteristics of breast cancer diagnostic assessment programmes influence service delivery: A mixed methods study.乳腺癌诊断评估项目的特征如何影响服务提供:一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12727. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12727. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
Patient-reported outcomes in ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review.导管原位癌患者报告结局的系统评价。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jan;71:95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.035. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
6
The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis.态度、规范和自我效能的改变对健康相关意图和行为的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;35(11):1178-1188. doi: 10.1037/hea0000387. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
7
A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of UK Breast Surgeons' Views on the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.一项关于英国乳腺外科医生对导管原位癌治疗观点的全国性横断面调查。
Int J Breast Cancer. 2015;2015:104231. doi: 10.1155/2015/104231. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
8
Which Dimensions of Patient-Centeredness Matter? - Results of a Web-Based Expert Delphi Survey.以患者为中心的哪些维度至关重要?——基于网络的专家德尔菲调查结果
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0141978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141978. eCollection 2015.
9
How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey.导管原位癌的不同术语如何影响女性的担忧和治疗偏好:一项全国性社区调查中的随机比较
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 2;5(11):e008094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008094.
10
How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts women's concern and management preferences: A qualitative study.导管原位癌(DCIS)的不同术语如何影响女性的担忧及治疗偏好:一项定性研究。
Breast. 2015 Oct;24(5):673-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 12.