School of Social Development and Public Policy (SSDPP), Beijing Normal University, 19, XinjiekouWai Street, Beijing, 100875, China.
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, 071000, China.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):1269. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7408-7.
Several studies have demonstrated that smoke-free legislation is associated with a reduced risk of mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to examine and quantify the potential effect of smoke-free legislation on AMI mortality rate in different countries.
Studies were identified using a systematic search of the scientific literature from electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Embase, Google Scholar, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), from their inception through September 30, 2017. A random effects model was employed to estimate the overall effects of smoke-free legislation on the AMI mortality rate. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the possible causes of heterogeneity in risk estimates based on sex and age. The results of meta-analysis after excluding the studies with a high risk of bias were reported in this study.
A total of 10 eligible studies with 16 estimates of effect size were included in this meta-analysis. Significant heterogeneity in the risk estimates was identified (overall I = 94.6%, p < 0.001). Therefore, a random effects model was utilized to estimate the overall effect of smoke-free legislation. There was an 8% decline in AMI mortality after introducing smoke-free legislation (RR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-0.94). The results of subgroup analyses showed that smoke-free legislation was significantly associated with lower rates of mortality for the following 5 diagnostic subgroups: smoke-free in workplaces, restaurants and bars (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.90-0.95), smaller sample size (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.95), study location in Europe (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94), regional study area (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94), and no previous local smoke-free legislation (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.90-0.93). However, there was not much difference in AMI mortality rates after the legislation between the longer (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98) and shorter follow-up duration subgroups (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94).
Smoke-free legislation could significantly reduce the AMI mortality rate by 8%. The reduction in the AMI mortality rate was more significant in studies with more comprehensive laws, without prior smoke-free bans, with a smaller sample size, at the regional level, and with a location in Europe.
多项研究表明,无烟立法与急性心肌梗死(AMI)死亡率降低有关。本研究旨在检验和量化无烟立法对不同国家 AMI 死亡率的潜在影响。
通过对包括 PubMed、Web of Science、ScienceDirect、Embase、Google Scholar 和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)在内的电子数据库进行系统检索,从研究开始到 2017 年 9 月 30 日,确定了研究。采用随机效应模型估计无烟立法对 AMI 死亡率的总体影响。根据性别和年龄进行亚组分析,以探讨风险估计值差异的可能原因。本研究报告了排除高偏倚风险研究后的荟萃分析结果。
这项荟萃分析共纳入了 10 项符合条件的研究,包含 16 项效应量估计。发现风险估计值存在显著异质性(总体 I=94.6%,p<0.001)。因此,采用随机效应模型来估计无烟立法的总体效果。引入无烟立法后,AMI 死亡率下降了 8%(RR=0.92,95%置信区间(CI):0.90-0.94)。亚组分析结果表明,无烟立法与以下 5 个诊断亚组的死亡率显著降低相关:工作场所、餐馆和酒吧无烟(RR=0.92,95%CI:0.90-0.95)、样本量较小(RR=0.92,95%CI:0.89-0.95)、研究地点在欧洲(RR=0.90,95%CI:0.85-0.94)、区域性研究区域(RR=0.92,95%CI:0.89-0.94)和无当地无烟立法(RR=0.91,95%CI:0.90-0.93)。然而,在立法后,较长(RR=0.92,95%CI:0.86-0.98)和较短(RR=0.92,95%CI:0.89-0.94)随访时间亚组之间,AMI 死亡率的差异并不明显。
无烟立法可使 AMI 死亡率显著降低 8%。在法律更全面、无先前禁烟令、样本量较小、区域性和欧洲地区进行的研究中,AMI 死亡率的降低更为显著。