Wasmann Karin Atgm, Klaver Charlotte El, van der Bilt Jarmila Dw, van Dieren Susan, Nagtegaal Iris D, Punt Cornelis Ja, van Ramshorst Bert, Wolthuis Albert M, de Wilt Johannes Hw, D'Hoore André, van Santvoort Hjalmar C, Tanis Pieter J
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, AZ 1105, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jul 29;11:7141-7157. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S205906. eCollection 2019.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a laparoscopic approach on long-term oncological outcomes in curative intent surgery for pT4 colon cancer, in both overall and stratified subgroups with distinct clinical entities.
Patients with a pT4N0-2M0 colon cancer from four centers between 2000 and 2014 were included. Laparoscopic and open approaches were compared according to the intention-to-treat principle. Propensity scores were used to adjust for baseline differences between the groups in three manners: i) as a linear predictor in a Cox regression model, ii) to create a 1:1 matched cohort, and iii) to stratify patients into four groups with an increasing chance of receiving laparoscopy.
In total, 424 patients were included. After 1:1 matching, a laparoscopic approach correlated with higher rates of radical resection, lower morbidity, and a higher percentage of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. This translated into better 5-year disease-free survival (52% vs 40%, HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50-0.96) and 5-year overall survival (68% vs 57%, HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.43-0.99). These results were confirmed in the other two propensity score analyses. In the multivariable models, adjuvant chemotherapy remained independently associated with better survival, whereas surgical approach lost significance.
In locally advanced colon cancer, an intentional laparoscopic approach in experienced hands seems to decrease morbidity and to increase the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with improved survival.
本研究旨在评估腹腔镜手术方式对pT4期结肠癌根治性手术长期肿瘤学结局的影响,涵盖总体及具有不同临床特征的分层亚组。
纳入2000年至2014年间来自四个中心的pT4N0 - 2M0期结肠癌患者。根据意向性治疗原则比较腹腔镜手术和开放手术方式。倾向评分用于以三种方式调整组间基线差异:i)作为Cox回归模型中的线性预测因子;ii)创建1:1匹配队列;iii)将患者分为四组,接受腹腔镜手术的概率递增。
共纳入424例患者。1:1匹配后,腹腔镜手术方式与更高的根治性切除率、更低的发病率以及接受辅助化疗患者的更高比例相关。这转化为更好的5年无病生存率(52%对40%,风险比0.70;95%置信区间0.50 - 0.96)和5年总生存率(68%对57%,风险比0.66;95%置信区间0.43 - 0.99)。这些结果在其他两项倾向评分分析中得到证实。在多变量模型中,辅助化疗仍然与更好的生存率独立相关,而手术方式失去显著性。
在局部晚期结肠癌中,经验丰富的术者采用腹腔镜手术方式似乎可降低发病率,并增加接受辅助化疗患者的比例。接受辅助化疗与生存率改善独立相关。